Mafiascum.net

Like your post just screamed scum to me.

I feel it needs to be said, but i don’t think that my read is necessarily correct.

In post 92, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think Titus is town. But I am rarely listened to day 1.

I think this is for the better, wouldn’t you agree? Just kidding, I think you did what you had to do last time we played. I’m just glad Town pulled it off.

In post 124, Flavor Leaf wrote:Andres, I can’t not scum read you.

You can do whatever you want. I don’t play the game to appease you.

At least you town read me, so that’s good.

In post 127, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 92, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think Titus is town. But I am rarely listened to day 1.

I think this is for the better, wouldn’t you agree? Just kidding, I think you did what you had to do last time we played. I’m just glad Town pulled it off.

I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling kids!

In post 130, Flavor Leaf wrote:At least you town read me, so that’s good.

You actually admitted the potential of being wrong. That has to count for something.

In post 114, superbowl9 wrote:CHOO CHOO ANIME IS FOREVER

VOTE: rannygazoo

Btw I just felt like pressuring this. Not saying Titus is completely off-base, but I have a feeling this is somewhat opportunistic.

I want to know why superrbowl9 doesn't include Large Normal 229(the last large normal btw) as "one of these days".

In post 122, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 59, benhalkum wrote:Yea, the way Titus is acting, to me, is in a way I'd feel comfortable voting her out of it came down to it.

But it's also brash, and scum may see it as a threat if she is in fact town, this targeting her at night.

Unless, she's scum and isn't worried about a night kill.
If that makes sense.

This is a mistake. Titus is acting exactly how you want Town to play. By taking stances and pushing, she’s making herself easier to sort.

Hello all. I am new to most of you, and frankly, not particularly good, but I have my moments. I’ll do my best to help.

Can you clarify what you mean by making herself easier to sort? Do you just mean she's acting towny to you, or do you think that acting like this helps reveal her true alignment no matter what it is?

In post 111, Titus wrote:@Ranny, 41 isn't a smoking gun, but it sure is scum indicative. Scum like to focus on theory.

I understand the sentiment here. Scum wants to post fluff rather than stick their neck out on fake reads. Try to put my posts in context, though. There was a debate about whether it's better in RVS to join old wagons and start new ones. I'm less experienced than you and it helps me to talk these things through, so I can decide, for instance, if ben really believed his wagon was suspicious or if it was a misdirection, or maybe just OMGUS. Other people have said it's consistent with his play, but I kind of think a player with a join date of 2007 should have these things figured out.

Your 41 focused all on RVS theory rather than making a conclusion on a read. Even now, you waffle on your stance on me. Are you lock scum? No. Are you the biggest suspect? Yes.

Come on. I said you're acting outside of your meta either because that's how you want to play scum or because you're a frustrated townie. Titus, I don't actually know what alignment you got in your role pm because I'm not part of the informed minority, so I would thank you not to pretend like I should be able to sort you already. If that's waffling, so is saying that I'm scummy but not lock scum.

@Flavor leaf do you want to finish your claim? Were you just waiting for someone to ask you? If you have a good reason for leaving your claim at "negative utility TBA", by all means do so, but I was told that site meta is that negative utility roles claim day 1.

Nah, you get the half claim

My strongest scumread right now is superbowl9. Of his 7 posts, only the first 2 are actual content (if you count RVS as content), and the rest are just clowning around and skating by. 114 is an awful vote, and bandwaggoning like this is scum-indicative in my experience. There's also this:

In post 121, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wait a minute, YOU were in that game.

FOS: Superbowl9

Why would you forget something like this unless you're trying to be deceptive about alignments?

I.don't know but lying is always suspicious.

In post 140, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I.don't know but lying is always suspicious.

You mean superbowl9 forgetting when Titus was scum? That's a weird thing to lie about. I feel it's more like he didn't want to think about it. Like, "I'm not really thinking too hard about when you were scum, so maybe you won't really think too hard about me being scum either."

yoVOTE: titusdidn't get the nk thing

In post 98, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 92, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think Titus is town. But I am rarely listened to day 1.

I agree. The strongest impression I get out of these starting pages is that Titus is Town.

what other impressions did you get

In post 121, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Wait a minute, YOU were in that game.

FOS: Superbowl9

She was scum that game?? With DDL?

In post 139, Rannygazoo wrote:114 is an awful vote, and bandwaggoning like this is scum-indicative in my experience.

Saving this for postgame so you can change this awful mentality

Nah i legitimately just forgot, i still don’t even really remember it to be completely honest, last two games with titus she was a weird 3P half-town thing and we teamed up and iirc she was town in some other game? Idk I don’t keep track of games that hard because i don’t value meta that much

.

.

.