Mafiascum.net

But it feels like you are blustering

Unfortunately I think the people who have posted thus far don't really interest me, which is a bit of an uncomfortable feeling

In post 125, Dunnstral wrote:But it feels like you are blustering

Yeah, that’s most of what I say.

Why are you acting like that’s different?

Been a while since you’ve been given the Third Degree Boon

In post 128, Flavor Leaf wrote:Why are you acting like that’s different?

It is in the sense that I don't think your 'move' here was particularly effective or informative

So when you say you got what you wanted it feels performative

Of course it’s performative.

What’s so wrong about that?

I’m putting on a show, sit back, watch me solve...on Day 4

In post 94, nopointinactingup wrote:So far, I like unwd and shelly's posts seems like they are trying to solve.

Johnny is more aggressive and lurks much more in his scum game, so leaning town.

I like this

In post 83, Dunnstral wrote:So this is how shelly plays as town

This sentence implies prior knowledge that Shelly is in fact town. I simply caught what I thought is a slip and voted you, I didn't bring up more reasons.

In post 100, Dunnstral wrote:That's attributing a strength to my read that I haven't expressed

This is bs. There is no read or strength attribution, you simply commented on your realization of how Shelly plays as town. Please show me how is that expressing town read?

83 is an implied read, I'm not sure how you see it as a slip instead

In post 104, unwnd wrote:Pointedly self-assured and unwilling to compromise for his own ideals

It's only scum when he breaks that mold in ways that give him thread brownie points

This isn't how he's acting at all and it's weird how you're defending him with it.

In post 134, Dunnstral wrote:83 is an implied read, I'm not sure how you see it as a slip instead

There is a real fine line between making implied reads and subconsciously blurting out prior knowledge.

83 seems pretty obvious in that I'm communicating that I think shelly is town, rather than going off of assumptions, which would be something a lot more subtle, and not me outright calling them town

Maybe it was .. but it still really pings me the wrong way as I explained

In post 138, nopointinactingup wrote:Maybe it was .. but it still really pings me the wrong way as I explained

It would be really difficult to "accidentally" slip like post 83

In post 135, nopointinactingup wrote:

In post 104, unwnd wrote:Pointedly self-assured and unwilling to compromise for his own ideals

It's only scum when he breaks that mold in ways that give him thread brownie points

This isn't how he's acting at all and it's weird how you're defending him with it.

Maybe not exclusively but I think there are silver linings in the way he's presented his arguments thus far that make my statement true

Even then, it was a metaread as I told Dunn

In post 13, unwnd wrote:VOTE: TheFuzzyLogic99
as you should

Expecting a lot of fuzzy logic from you, and maybe 99

In post 19, Not_Mafia wrote:

S

U

P

C

L

O

D

P

O

L

E

S

,

I

'

M

T

H

E

J

E

S

T

E

R

A

N

D

I

'

M

H

E

R

E

T

O

T

R

O

L

L

T

H

E

F

E

C

A

L

M

A

T

T

E

R

O

U

T

O

F

T

H

I

S

G

A

M

E

!

VOTE: Not_Mafia

Autotown

In post 13, unwnd wrote:VOTE: TheFuzzyLogic99

Expecting a lot of fuzzy logic from you, and maybe 99

as you should. I am the king of Fuzziness and Lynch bait.


Forgot to claim

In post 136, nopointinactingup wrote:

In post 134, Dunnstral wrote:83 is an implied read, I'm not sure how you see it as a slip instead

There is a real fine line between making implied reads and subconsciously blurting out prior knowledge.

yeah last game I said someone was in town..... I meant to make it sound like a town read . I am not sure if that what happening here but I think it something I need to keep my eyes on

Dunnstral - why do you think that Shlly is town as you gave zero indication why you have that read


@ FL- how can you tell. Doing a little more of nothing still gets you nothing. Anways Not Mafia is giving all indication of his town game. He did this last game as town and in the other game I saw where he is town.

We should prob sort FL and Titus. Both are good players and can be dangerous if they are scum. Just my humble opinion

In post 143, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Dunnstral - why do you think that Shlly is town as you gave zero indication why you have that read

A comparison between this game and a game where I saw them where they were mafia

dunn is similar to epilogue. townlean

johnny was quite lamisty in bus service (scum!him town!me) especially when pushed ("i'll flip green where will you look next?")

flavour, can you back up that meta read of yours with links?
FL seems a bit overconfident which I'd expect from scum!him more because flavour treats playing scum as performing/theatre (quite like myself)

nopointactingup gaslighting dunn as "100% confident on town!shelly" is scummy. also the backtracking when met with resistance from dunn/unwnd i dislike.

fuzzy feels very surface level but is more verbose than what I've seen of scum!him atm.

unwnd's thoughts quite align with my own.

unwnd and nopoint: what do you think of each other?

nopoint, despite you thinking unwnd's early posting as townie, has unwnd's passionate defense of dunn changed your mind?

In post 143, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Anways Not Mafia is giving all indication of his town game. He did this last game as town and in the other game I saw where he is town.

fuzzy, N_M's openpost is NAI or else it would fall under the definition of a trust tell

to elaborate on dunn a bit more: similarities from epilogue include being very opinionated/direct.

i also see a certain town passion/fire to defend himself against votes that (imo) arent that well-reasoned and are based off vague meta or misrep

I think right now I have suspension of disbelief with some of the arguments being said. You have a lot of them seeped into essentially good faith (just trust me bro vibes) but that seems pretty par for the course early on. I find Dunn null despite my defense of him, and maybe tilted my head just a little bit when he made p#105. The problem with nopoint I have is that he is arguing with the same process he is. It reads to me like a potential scum who didn't have prior thoughts so they just defaulted to turning the original argument against his attacker

VOTE: nopointcatchingup