Mafiascum.net

In post 123, Red wrote:

In post 117, Titus wrote:Not liking bob perfume and vax but that list contains at most 1 scum due to

voting theory.

go on

I get the sense just ignoring Titus will be best for the game regardless of their alignment

In post 123, Red wrote:

In post 117, Titus wrote:Not liking bob perfume and vax but that list contains at most 1 scum due to

voting theory.

go on

Perfume and Vax are not likely scum together because two scum piling on me is highly unlikely as I don't think I pose that much of a threat. Seems awkward.

Vax and Bob are unlikely scum together because they both used the same tactic to create two different wagons. This type of approach draws attention to them both and makes it twice as likely to get caught.

Bob and perfume are unlikely scum together because Bob's vote undermines Perfume's "serious" push by creating an alternative.

Basically, they aren't acting in concert.

[/end professor]

In post 125, wellermanbob wrote:

In post 123, Red wrote:

In post 117, Titus wrote:Not liking bob perfume and vax but that list contains at most 1 scum due to

voting theory.

go on

I get the sense just ignoring Titus will be best for the game regardless of their alignment

Why? Do you think my reads are bad? Why the heavy handed discredit?

Is there any way to not lose my post when someone else posts while I'm posting on this site?

In post 127, Titus wrote:Do you think my reads are bad?

I think they're indistinguishable from throwing darts at a board at the moment because you've offered up reasoning that doesn't seem relevant AND you're publicly explaining them all which combines for a nasty distraction in my opinion

In post 128, wellermanbob wrote:Is there any way to not lose my post when someone else posts while I'm posting on this site?

Usually, they don't get lost?

I actually think you're a townlean but have no interest in hive minding reads with you i guess, if that makes any sense

Weird it's happened to me twice

In post 129, wellermanbob wrote:

In post 127, Titus wrote:Do you think my reads are bad?

I think they're indistinguishable from throwing darts at a board at the moment because you've offered up reasoning that doesn't seem relevant AND you're publicly explaining them all which combines for a nasty distraction in my opinion

Wait, you're problem is that I am explaining my reads so I should be discredited? But I'm probably town and you have no interest in working with me because of my explanations?

#confused

I think smoke and mirrors and infinity something are the two most significant slots to place at the moment.

Which may or may not include purging with extreme passion

In post 133, Titus wrote:I am explaining my reads

You're explaining reads but they are not useful because you are applying a book on draughts to a game of canasta

Mistyx is likely town.

I like Bob more, even if he's annoying me.

<3

I'll ignore that one too though

In post 124, Mistyx wrote:

In post 122, Titus wrote:

In post 121, Mistyx wrote:i dont see how the coward part is negative utility

why didn't you just claim ascetic?

Later on, people can be killed in battles. I can't be killed this way unless someone has a way around that.

i thought the coward part was your choice?

Yes but why would I fight town or risk giving scum an evolution.

The only time I should willingly fight Pv P is if I thought I could beat scum. My toon is too weak to do that most likely.

Or if I deliberately died to a competent mod-confirmed town.

UNVOTE:

Got what I wanted.

In post 127, Titus wrote:Why? Do you think my reads are bad? Why the heavy handed discredit?

Emotional reaction here feels town

-Inf

In post 142, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: infinity

Pretty cool vote dude!

In post 144, wellermanbob wrote:

In post 142, Vaxkiller wrote:VOTE: infinity

Pretty cool vote dude!

Thank you!

Looks good on me, right?

hey Titus bet I can guess your full flavor

@bob

When someone else posts while you are writing, you have to click submit again.

I'm here again

Concerningly little occurring rn for a short deadline game

VOTE: Vaxkiller