Page 6 of 194
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 10:54 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 88, Rannygazoo wrote: In post 38, Andresvmb wrote: In post 34, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm aware of the fallacy but from an emotional standpoint there's still some validity there I think. I'm not saying hes scum butonestly I will look for any excuse to bypass Rvs.
Don’t worry I had a feeling that you were really just trying to push me in some sort of way to get a reaction and see if you can figure out my alignment from that. Unfortunately it just won’t be that easy. I’ll try and make it obvious to you this is still my Town self though.
Idk bro your vibe’s kind of off
VOTE: Andres
I agree with this.
It seems like an overly quick conclusion for such an dubious claim to believe it and nit only that but call it: "the towniest miller claim"
Not the strongest case but i like it as my first wagon.
VOTE: Andresvmb
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:22 am
by Hayker
vote:Andres
Originally I misread Andres post a bit and was going to point out I consider it a scum tell to insist onesself is town, but Andres didn't quite do that. Even so it feels very offputting. The cockyness of " oh I wont react.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:22 am
by Nero Cain
(in australian accent)
thats not a vote
VOTE: MiniMegabyte
THIS
is a vote.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:34 am
by chkflip
VOTE: MiniMegabyte
This is the way.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:36 am
by BBmolla
VOTE: MiniMegabyte
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:37 am
by NorwegianboyEE
They haven’t posted yet?
Ouch.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:38 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Oh they have.
But after looking at the ISO they might as well not have.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:52 am
by chkflip
Skate or die.
You're very generous. Please keep going.
Well yes, but also no.
Interesting reaction. But what does it mean?
WhyEE?
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:59 am
by NorwegianboyEE
For question 1:
It means you came in with a surprisingly big thread presence and a large voice so i just commented on that. Nothing more to it.
For question 2:
While i could see getting some townpings from Nero based on their initial posts maybe, coming to the conclusion he is town is a bit hasty to me. I'm not sold yet.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:07 am
by chkflip
PARA UNO: Yeah but why are you saying "okay guy we get it" instead of "chk makes me feel a feeling"? Why comment that the thing happened instead of voicing your opinion on the thing that happened? Blah blah blah Information Instead of Analysis blah blah fix yourself.
NUMBER B: I assumed it was that your interpretation of "x is town/prob/scum/null/dip" was different than mine. It is. Carry on.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:11 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Why are you a tennis racket?
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:13 am
by PlusJOYED
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:17 am
by PlusJOYED
have fun that sounds like a fun place to live. I visited there once
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:20 am
by chkflip
It isn't.
EE: It's a ping pong paddle and a ball smiling at one another. And it's because Saint Quilford of Olde made it for me. I sometimes switch to other stuff but this goofy little avatar has been a mainstay for longer than you've played mafia. Why are you following up superfluous statements with meaningless questions?
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:27 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 138, chkflip wrote:Why are you following up superfluous statements with meaningless questions?
To see if it annoys you.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:56 am
by Vaxkiller
oh cool a wagon!
VOTE: minimegabyte
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:00 am
by Vaxkiller
chkflip, have we played before?
Titus, good to see you. I feel like I can read you pretty well once we get started.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:14 am
by Rannygazoo
In post 104, chkflip wrote:You claim in your first post. Period. Your claim can just be a stand alone post with just the claim and literally nothing else. Your claim can contain whatever you wish to reveal; however, what you do not do as the Goddamn Miller is go "oh, hey, yeahhhh... by the waaaay" when you're actually the Miller.
This rigid thinking isn’t helpful. It’s not like the Miller claim was meant to weasel out of something. It was on the first page, immediately after their first post. I’d be suspicious if it seemed like you were trying to push this as an agenda this game, instead of rambling about a preferred meta.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 4:19 am
by chkflip
Vax, I don't believe so, but if we have it wasn't more than once.
Fascinating, you do have motivations.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 5:45 am
by Titus
VOTE: Hayker
Chkflip, I'd love to get together sometime. PM me with your schedule and we'll work it out.
@EE, *glares*
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:33 am
by Nero Cain
I realize that I'm scum reading 2 possible 2 scum but Rannys post gives me bad vibes for some reason.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:39 am
by Gamma Emerald
So the claim is real but there was also the shared history?
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:11 am
by Rannygazoo
In post 145, Nero Cain wrote:I realize that I'm scum reading 2 possible 2 scum but Rannys post gives me bad vibes for some reason.
Is it because I’m feeling out the game and not going all in on a scumread? I don’t like to do that until I have more data. Titus scumread me in our last game for that reason.
That’s not to say I don’t think town can make good progress today. If we can stop scum day 1, that’s great. More effective than day 2.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:31 am
by Andresvmb
In post 97, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Can you quantify this statement? What other Miller claims have you seen?
record scratch
The mafiascum wiki is not Wikipedia, don’t go looking for role info on Wikipedia
This looks like town
Btw the probability talk on page 2 was quite refreshing, like a good herbal tea
I clarified in my very next post that I was just being over the top and didn’t fully mean that (mostly just trying to create discussion and be funny). But I guess I have to repeat myself - it’s not the Towniest Miller claim ever, and I will not be relying on it to make a judgment on alignment either way.
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:32 am
by Andresvmb
In post 125, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 88, Rannygazoo wrote: In post 38, Andresvmb wrote: In post 34, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm aware of the fallacy but from an emotional standpoint there's still some validity there I think. I'm not saying hes scum butonestly I will look for any excuse to bypass Rvs.
Don’t worry I had a feeling that you were really just trying to push me in some sort of way to get a reaction and see if you can figure out my alignment from that. Unfortunately it just won’t be that easy. I’ll try and make it obvious to you this is still my Town self though.
Idk bro your vibe’s kind of off
VOTE: Andres
I agree with this.
It seems like an overly quick conclusion for such an dubious claim to believe it and nit only that but call it: "the towniest miller claim"
Not the strongest case but i like it as my first wagon.
VOTE: Andresvmb
You jumping so quickly on such a crappy argument could be argued to be Scummy. We’ll see.