Mafiascum.net

In post 124, Datisi wrote:what do you mean meme-shitpushing you isn't town-indicative

oh yeah

gif daddies count double

In post 124, Datisi wrote:ok, why is me coming to the town!gera conclusion based on his claim townie, but you suspected gypyx for defending him for the same thing?

i literally said it ain't much

and the gyp thing was circumstantial and the way he did it, when he did it
we came to a town!geraint conclusion after more discussion

In post 128, Iconeum wrote:we came to a town!geraint conclusion after more discussion

not quite true, i slotted him as town for it back then too, i just didn't wanna say so bc you were yelling at gypyx about it and i wanted to see where that went and/or didn't want you to yell at me

if your question is "well what did you get from it" the answer is not much
gypyx doesn't give me the "must murder immediately" vibes he gave me in pyp but very old meta, probably shouldn't base reads things around that one game, etc

not sure why you wanna compare parts of that

gyp also had the defence of the claim, which you didn't

there's a bunch of things different

ackchyually let me pretend to do some serious analysis on posts from page 1-2


^^ this is a weird sequence

(1) gera's intro says he's sick of being voted early, says he'll play differently this game
(2) gera then claims his informed in the same post
(3) ico says he's reading that post as scum
(4) gypyx defends him by saying that gera prob planned that pre-role pm so that's prob why it sounds weird
(5) ico replies "oh did he plan to claim early pre-role pm?"
(6) gypyx backs off with "good point"

now, this is an odd sequence because

when ico attacked and gypyx defended gera, it seemed to me like they were talking about (1), which is attacking/defending the "i'll play differently", which i mean, is valid grounds for suspicion, but also if it's really preplanned it's nai (like i can see both sides here)

now ico attacked gyp with "well do you think he was preplanning to roleclaim?" - and i'd expect gyp's reply to that would be "well no, but i'm not saying (2) was preplanned, i'm just saying (1) was preplanned and that that is nai"

and instead gyp backs off and agrees w ico - which cooooouuuld be scum avoiding heat or trying not to defend a townie in hopes there's a t/t fight in the making

VOTE: gypyx

discuss

towntisi hiiiii

thank fuck

a little bit more substance: 131 words really well what i feel but couldn't really put into a sentence okay

yeah, somewhere in the typing of 124 and 129 i realized i'm forcing the comparison for the sake of reading you
then i decided to go back and look for the differences that you were seeing
and idk here we are?

i mean, i didn't mind you were doing the forcefull comparing thing, at least it felt like you were trying to sort me

ye, i'm just commenting how it was one of those moments where you're typing a post, then in the middle of typing it you go "wait, what the fuck am i even saying, this doesn't make sense"

although i am slightly concerned and/or offended that you think 131 is out my scumrange, but i'll roll with it (for now)

i you honestly think i've locktowned you… yeah no

out of scumrange? probably not

but if feels townie and leans in with how i saw gyp so it's Good Enough for me for now

In post 1, MiniMegabyte wrote:Day 1 is up to 10 days long. Days 2+ are up to 7 days long.

In post 138, MiniMegabyte wrote:Day ends in 13 days, 20 hours, 57 minutes

In post 138, MiniMegabyte wrote:

Vote Count 1.2

Gypyx

(3) -> Datisi, Iconeum, geraintm

GeorgeBailey

(1) -> Gypyx

Not Voting

(9) -> Not_Mafia, GeorgeBailey, Datisi, Gypyx, geraintm, NorwegianboyEE, Iconeum, innocentvillager, Anya
Day ends in (expired on 2021-04-28 18:32:00)

I'm down as voting and not voting

Hello everyone I hope you have a wonderful day so far. A lot of content already. That's nice.

In post 11, geraintm wrote:hello all.
I'm fed up of always getting eliminated for my normal style of play (which is very "sit back and vote infrequently")

I said in my last game i am going to be different.

So, firstly this is the 8th post so far in the game so far.

And there is a Mafia one time Strongman in this game, i have been informed of this fact.

I really doubt it is the only reason why you gets eliminated. That is never enough. But that's really good that you want to improve.

In post 131, Datisi wrote:ackchyually let me pretend to do some serious analysis on posts from page 1-2

Spoiler:

In post 11, geraintm wrote:hello all.
I'm fed up of always getting eliminated for my normal style of play (which is very "sit back and vote infrequently")

I said in my last game i am going to be different.

So, firstly this is the 8th post so far in the game so far.

And there is a Mafia one time Strongman in this game, i have been informed of this fact.

In post 15, Iconeum wrote:

In post 11, geraintm wrote:hello all.
I'm fed up of always getting eliminated for my normal style of play (which is very "sit back and vote infrequently")

I said in my last game i am going to be different.

So, firstly this is the 8th post so far in the game so far.

And there is a Mafia one time Strongman in this game, i have been informed of this fact.

why am i reading this like it's coming from mafia

not even joking

In post 18, Gypyx wrote:lots of informed in this game

/s

pedit : i think he planned to do this kind of stuff before receiving role PM, maybe that's why that sounds artifical?

(t'was @post 15)

In post 21, Iconeum wrote:so you are suggesting he'd come out claiming whatever role he got or?

In post 26, Gypyx wrote:

In post 21, Iconeum wrote:so you are suggesting he'd come out claiming whatever role he got or?

hmmm, good point

it's up to gera to explain it anyways lol, just theorizing

^^ this is a weird sequence

(1) gera's intro says he's sick of being voted early, says he'll play differently this game
(2) gera then claims his informed in the same post
(3) ico says he's reading that post as scum
(4) gypyx defends him by saying that gera prob planned that pre-role pm so that's prob why it sounds weird
(5) ico replies "oh did he plan to claim early pre-role pm?"
(6) gypyx backs off with "good point"

now, this is an odd sequence because

when ico attacked and gypyx defended gera, it seemed to me like they were talking about (1), which is attacking/defending the "i'll play differently", which i mean, is valid grounds for suspicion, but also if it's really preplanned it's nai (like i can see both sides here)

now ico attacked gyp with "well do you think he was preplanning to roleclaim?" - and i'd expect gyp's reply to that would be "well no, but i'm not saying (2) was preplanned, i'm just saying (1) was preplanned and that that is nai"

and instead gyp backs off and agrees w ico - which cooooouuuld be scum avoiding heat or trying not to defend a townie in hopes there's a t/t fight in the making

VOTE: gypyx

discuss

if people want, i can go find the post i made in my last game where i said there i was fed up with everyone hating my normal playstyle.
alice - it isn't me improving, i was more than happy with how i went about games just no one else is. and people are hating the new me too so i've got that going for me

In post 143, AliceK wrote:

In post 11, geraintm wrote:hello all.
I'm fed up of always getting eliminated for my normal style of play (which is very "sit back and vote infrequently")

I said in my last game i am going to be different.

So, firstly this is the 8th post so far in the game so far.

And there is a Mafia one time Strongman in this game, i have been informed of this fact.

I really doubt it is the only reason why you gets eliminated. That is never enough. But that's really good that you want to improve.

you quote that post

and the part you wanna reply on is that?

In post 144, geraintm wrote:if people want, i can go find the post i made in my last game where i said there i was fed up with everyone hating my normal playstyle.

is that seriously the only thing you got from 131?

In post 147, Datisi wrote:

In post 144, geraintm wrote:if people want, i can go find the post i made in my last game where i said there i was fed up with everyone hating my normal playstyle.

is that seriously the only thing you got from 131?

In post 131, Datisi wrote:
now ico attacked gyp with "well do you think he was preplanning to roleclaim?" - and i'd expect gyp's reply to that would be "well no, but i'm not saying (2) was preplanned, i'm just saying (1) was preplanned and that that is nai"

i was responding to this bit where people were discussing if i had any plans this game to do stuff before this game started. not the preplanned informed townie bit. i want to be as honest as possible and explain my actions, so was just trying to add in info.

my claim - i am happy having done it. i am 99% sure there will be some protective role in town who is happier knowing that scum has a strongman, and when eventually a mafia strongman is eliminated i will be confirmed.

unless i've planned with my scum partners to bus the strong man....

Iconeum, Datisi, geraintm give me Town vibes.
I am very sure about Iconeum, he is just too paranoid to be a scum.