Mafiascum.net

In post 122, orctin wrote:Jack - I'm basing off two 2 scum - one being active and posting - hoping to control - the other more laid back - you fit into the later group but with multiple people.
I think it's rare you get 2 scum who are both pushing heavy but it's possible but i would suspect one scum in the heavy chatters and one in the more reserve chatters

And you seriously say Rational is more town for his half cooked reads early on just to make them, lol. interesting

I never said Rational is more Town. You both keep putting words in my mouth, I said if they *are* Town and my reads is wrong I would much rather them in the game than you as we stand now.

In post 43, Clasko wrote:Hello all!

Reading, reading...

^ VERY cautious

In post 58, Clasko wrote:

In post 25, RationalMadman wrote:T3 supporting me is easily to soften me up and/or to frame me if T3 flips scum later.

In post 26, RationalMadman wrote:T3 may be town, on balance, because of how actively he defended Ivy agaibst Demainer wheb he noticed she was 2/5 and Demainer's response to T3 was worth scum reading somewhat.

Do you have a preference between labelling him town/mafia here? You seem conflicted.

In post 41, T3 wrote:Also what are everyone's thoughts on Demainer. His meta seems very different to 2060.

Nothing is pinging me to a change in meta for him. He is playing and posting as I would expect him to rn based on 2060.

In post 14, orctin wrote:Cause it's a good play for a scummie to push on anther who made a high profile post. at the very least it attracts attention where scum want it - away from them.

Eh, I'm getting "helpful for the sake of appearing helpful" vibes from this:

VOTE: orctin

^ "You seem conflicted." What kind of line is this?? I could follow what Rational was saying pretty easily, it's not rocket science to figure out what T3 is doing right now.
Then there's a comment on meta, is it stemming from having TMI? who knows, idk the person
"helpful for the sake of appearing helpful" vibes LMAOOO fam. the game JUST started.. AND orc was responding to me? so you're taking it out of context... something scum loves to do.

In post 60, Clasko wrote:

In post 6, Ivyeo wrote:VOTE: Clasko
It's impossible to be Pr twice in a row
/s

Also, I skipped over this, how dare you >:c
c;

^ "I skipped the first post of the game, oh no!" you sure you weren't distracted with a private thread? mmmm

In post 97, Clasko wrote:

In post 27, T3 wrote:Ivy is lean town for me if Demainer is scum. Other than that, I'm not sure about Ivy.

In post 93, T3 wrote:Town:RM
Lean town: Rathe, Ivy
Null: Clasko
Lean scum: orctin, Andante
Scum: Dem

Some questions for you, T3:

1. Why do you townread Ivy? You say "if Demainer is scum" but I don't see the correlation.
2. Where does JacksonVirgo place?

^ Ok, so on these questions you "seem to have" You ask about a lean town rather than the solid town he has marked? you ask about the solid SR, you feel no need to ask about Rational being solid town so soon? And we only care about Ivy in the lean towns? interesting. These feel like questions you don't care about the answers to, meaning you post, and leave, and think you're looking towny. These questions also don't even help progress the game, but this is the only "significant" thing you've done.

In post 99, Clasko wrote:

In post 95, orctin wrote:If they are masons then at this point they might as well say so cause by what being said scum already know - if not then it's a sidetrack arguement to sow doubt among town

The lesser of two evils is ensuring Mafia aren't certain where the PR's are.

^ You know they aren't both masons, one is your partner, and it feels like you said this to seem towny like, by saying this, it's your argument for your partner not having to claim they're not a mason.





This game is way too easy

VOTE: Clasko

Yes. I quoted Clasko's entire ISO. Those are all of his lines thus far. He's scum, and I honestly don't think you could convince me otherwise

In post 60, Clasko wrote:

In post 6, Ivyeo wrote:VOTE: Clasko
It's impossible to be Pr twice in a row
/s

Also, I skipped over this, how dare you >:c
c;

^ "I skipped the first post of the game, oh no!" you sure you weren't distracted with a private thread? mmmm
This was an exact quote from me last game, when he RVS'd me, just for reference

Also Hi rereading now, been busy most of the day

In post 93, T3 wrote:Town:RM
Lean town: Rathe, Ivy
Null: Clasko
Lean scum: orctin, Andante
Scum: Dem

Are you going to explain your sr on me, or are you just going to vomit reads without doing anything?

In post 97, Clasko wrote:

In post 27, T3 wrote:Ivy is lean town for me if Demainer is scum. Other than that, I'm not sure about Ivy.

In post 93, T3 wrote:Town:RM
Lean town: Rathe, Ivy
Null: Clasko
Lean scum: orctin, Andante
Scum: Dem

Some questions for you, T3:

1. Why do you townread Ivy? You say "if Demainer is scum" but I don't see the correlation.
2. Where does JacksonVirgo place?

What do you think of jack and t3?

In post 111, orctin wrote:Interesting start to the game and quite an active day 1 but i think a lot of that came from Rational's stirring.

Honestly right now the most questionable on seems to be T3
Andante got caught up by Rational's early post so not really sure there
Ivyeo seems to be active but basically making simple post to appear participating with town without doing much to offend
Rathe - Similar - to Ivyeo
Jack - hasn't posted much except early
Clasko - good cover for that scum laying low but probably town
Demainer - still never explained that Ivy is scum vote post

If i was to guess - one of Rathe-Jack-Clasko-Ivy is scum
the other is with the rest of us (present company excluded)

I've already thoroughly explained my position on ivy, she's posting exactly like her scum game last time. "I've been reading the thread", "I'm busy", "I've been rereading", and not posting anything of substance at all. It's a self-conscious play at this point.

andante's post makes me feel good, their reads so far mostly align with my position as well, with the exception of ivy.

clasko's posting doesn't give me good vibes at all, in the last game he was quick to move the game forward with prelim leans and reads, his iso so far is a lot weaker.

In post 127, Andante wrote:

In post 60, Clasko wrote:

In post 6, Ivyeo wrote:VOTE: Clasko
It's impossible to be Pr twice in a row
/s

Also, I skipped over this, how dare you >:c
c;

I think this is a subtle reference to the previous game (read ivy's iso).

I mean, I don't care if it's a reference from last game or not, looking at all his lines... they are really bad, and the fact he decided to say "I skipped over this" to the first post?? ehhh he hasn't given any actual content, his lines are all super fillery, and asking questions he doesn't care the answer to. That's like a given sign someone is mafia

In post 89, Demainer wrote:It feels like a genuine list of reads, not forced at all.

maybe so but the vote was strange like it was random

In post 91, T3 wrote:I feel like Andante did something of a subconscious slip. Andante says RM and I are masons, but why not scumpartners (from a town POV)?

even rational feels uncomfortable with your townread n andante does think ur mafia

i dont think T3 and rational r partners cuz they r linked

if rational was mafia he would probably tell T3 not to get to close

111
u rly think me and ivyeo r the same i dont think so

In post 140, Rathe wrote:i dont think T3 and rational r partners cuz they r linked

ok, thanks for repeating what I've been saying...

thoughts on clasco?

i dont know u n demainer seem to know better about him

i cant get anything from his 5 posts it doesnt sound like anything

i think he has a chance to be mafia as anyone else

you don't feel clasko should have a single line of substance thus far?

In post 144, Rathe wrote:i dont know u n demainer seem to know better about him

My only reference point is the last game where I played with clasko and ivy (2060), if you go through both their isos in that game, then you'll know just as much about them as I do now.

I've never played a game with clasko before... hmm is Rathe not town