In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
What's interesting about it?
your phrasing
Not the fact people are being scummy?
no...? considering theres been like 3 pages and you havent outlined who youre talking about
In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players
In post 93, ManateeGal wrote:i'd assume the number of players that start demonic is 4-5 if 7 demonic players for a maf win
-53 is a bad response because I don't think the "phrasing" is the interesting part, or what that entails
-64 is scummy for asking about this and the response feels off.
-90 is worded like mafia write things and this is an easy angle for scum to take when discussing this mechanic
-93 seems like bad reasoning
In post 117, Annie Edison wrote:Townreading Dunn bc I don’t see scum Dunn pulling the “oh wait scum can send shards”
X
Elaborate?
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:56 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
lol nice scumclaim buddy
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:56 am
by Sleez
Red X is to my liking, let me try.
In post 123, Medea the Alien wrote:Current "Cool shit I want to post but my wife slapped my hand because that is probably a dumb idea and I should feel bad" count: 4
[X]
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:57 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
good thing im p sure you won't get saved by modabandonment this time
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:57 am
by Annie Edison
In post 99, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't realize that scum had an alternative win condition.
I still think we should consider powering somebody up, but don't think we should hand it out randomly.
That’s what I took this as peanut gallery
Especially because it was pre announced there was an alternate scum wincon
@ffery- I’ll be entirey honest I’m going to read you guys off bell
Nothing you’ve posted has sent off alarm bells though!
In post 2, borkjerfkin wrote:
[*]Unless otherwise specified, a player is considered "Demonic" if they have two or more shards, otherwise, they are classified as "Human". Players may start with 0 or more shards per their role.
[*]During the day, in addition to the normal elimination vote, players may also vote for a player to give a single shard to using HURT: Hurt Tags. This must be done before the elimination because elimination will end the day. While the vote to give a shard must take place before the end of the day, the shard will not be assigned to the awarded player until then. It is not compulsory to give a shard in this manner. There may be other ways to receive shards.
[*]I will confirm the number of shards each player has via PM at the beginning of every phase and whether that makes them
Human
or
Demonic
.
I believe that shards going to town is in general good but might be case-by-case depending on who you ask. And 'how good' is also case-by-case, but in general my expectations are that demonic form is an upgrade to human form in the majority of cases.
HURT: Here There Be Dragons
The count of demonic players give scum an alternate wincon, though.
To pile onto this, since the "demonic or not demonic" status flips on death, it's ideal to NOT claim this or crumb this whatsoever, and fferybell is bad and should feel bad for having even hinted at how they work.
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
What's interesting about it?
your phrasing
Not the fact people are being scummy?
no...? considering theres been like 3 pages and you havent outlined who youre talking about
In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players
In post 93, ManateeGal wrote:i'd assume the number of players that start demonic is 4-5 if 7 demonic players for a maf win
-53 is a bad response because I don't think the "phrasing" is the interesting part, or what that entails
-64 is scummy for asking about this and the response feels off.
-90 is worded like mafia write things and this is an easy angle for scum to take when discussing this mechanic
-93 seems like bad reasoning
Overall I think scum
VOTE: ManateeGal
93 does seem like bad reasoning, but i didn't think it was especially scummy. 90 isn't a great post, but i did like her shrug post, as stupid as that sounds
Medea and Pooky are both scum for machismoing regardless of role pm.
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:00 am
by Here There Be Dragons
In post 2, borkjerfkin wrote:At the beginning of every game day, I will publicly post a rough indication of the number of demonic players in the game, using one of the following ranges: Low (0-2), Medium (3-4), or High (5-6).
In post 2, borkjerfkin wrote:At the beginning of every game day, I will publicly post a rough indication of the number of demonic players in the game, using one of the following ranges: Low (0-2), Medium (3-4), or High (5-6).