Mafiascum.net

In post 121, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Possibilites for the 5th caller include "no alignment" (controlled by mod), a scum caller similar to a traitor that is unknown to the scumteam and scum caller, or town. Imo the verbiage, which seems carefully selected, rules them out as a scum that is known to the scumteam

In post 9, rousseau wrote:

In post 4, Morning Tweet wrote:

>>

At least three of the callers wish for the town to win.

>>

One of the callers wishes for the scum to win and is informed of the scums' identities. Scum knows which caller this is.

could you imagine

being a third party radio caller newbie stump

In post 11, rousseau wrote:

In post 10, Infinity 324 wrote:pedit: that'd be fun tbh

i assume the ambiguity is just for our benefit, but yeah

In post 12, rousseau wrote:

In post 11, rousseau wrote:i assume the ambiguity is just for our benefit, but yeah

i guess there could potentially be two callers who wish for the scum to win and the second is uninformed and the scum are also not informed of this caller based on wording

In post 13, rousseau wrote:but more likely just 4-1 for operational purposes

In post 122, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 121, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Possibilites for the 5th caller include "no alignment" (controlled by mod), a scum caller similar to a traitor that is unknown to the scumteam and scum caller, or town. Imo the verbiage, which seems carefully selected, rules them out as a scum that is known to the scumteam

Could have their own wincon too

In post 127, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:every1 is trying to fake townslip look what you started

In post 126, Ydrasse wrote:what the hell is happening

In post 134, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 126, Ydrasse wrote:what the hell is happening

ignore them do u have reads

In post 130, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:or they have valuable info