Page 6 of 55

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:35 pm
by Knight Lavender
I admire that Beige stands firm in their dismissal when it would be easy enough to, as they say, roll over and accept consensus.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:35 pm
by Knight Burgundy
In post 120, Knight Azure wrote:
In post 119, Knight Burgundy wrote:Really don't want to get left out
But you can't get left out because you are warm knight.
Not really? Through the ridiculous floral language they are basically looking for someone to help them w scum hunting this game is what I got

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:36 pm
by Knight Burgundy
Ignore quote that was aimed at Beige saying Chart opening was nai

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:38 pm
by Knight Burgundy
In post 98, Knight Beige wrote:
In post 96, The Rainbow Knight wrote:What do you not like about Crimson's posting?
Too much fluff.
It was page 4 this is ridiculous

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:39 pm
by Knight Beige
It doesn't matter what page it was, he made a proposal.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:40 pm
by Knight Beige
*They made a proposal

I also disagree with your incredibly charitable reading of Chart's alignment based off early posts

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:43 pm
by The Rainbow Knight
Beige who do you town read of the cool people?

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:44 pm
by Knight Azure
In post 129, Knight Beige wrote:It doesn't matter what page it was, he made a proposal.
So am I correct to assume that you don't think too highly of Crimson Knight because they fluffed their way towards an early proposal?

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:51 pm
by Knight Crimson
In post 98, Knight Beige wrote:
In post 96, The Rainbow Knight wrote:What do you not like about Crimson's posting?
Too much fluff.
I must hear more about your definition of "fluff". I am being a little, let's call it, "extra", in the spirit of the game. But I wouldn't say I've sacrificed my care for posting game-relevant content. I'm not much of an early game knight, truth be told, but I have gathered a few ideas together.
In post 99, Ydrasse wrote:
Image

Knight Crimson and Knight Lavender have formed a Palette!
It's a beautiful palette.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:54 pm
by Knight Crimson
In post 105, Knight Rose wrote:
In post 86, Knight Crimson wrote:An easy lie to make as scum, yes, but one they think to make, perhaps a tad less likely.
I think we should actually be careful of this. I think the lack of meta gives mafia a lot of freedom to manipulate. I can see what you're saying though about scum having a slightly less chance of thinking to make a post from that perspective. But a mafia in the previous dance game was initially townread for similar reasons. Looking at Azure's other posts, I can't really make a read. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
You raise a valid point,
Knight Rose
. I do not place too much weight into my theory.

I do like Azure's odds for being an upstanding knight, though, so I wanted to clarify that with my second correspondence around them.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:56 pm
by Knight Azure
Oh yeah one more thing.
Since there are second pair makings in progress, we should try (I say try because lol4days) to come to consensus about who should be Rainbow Knight's partner. I'd like Rainbow Knight to be paired with the towniest warm knight possible.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:57 pm
by Knight Beige
In post 131, The Rainbow Knight wrote:Beige who do you town read of the cool people?
Azure and Lavender

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:58 pm
by Knight Burgundy
In post 98, Knight Beige wrote:
In post 96, The Rainbow Knight wrote:What do you not like about Crimson's posting?
Too much fluff.
In post 130, Knight Beige wrote:*They made a proposal

I also disagree with your incredibly charitable reading of Chart's alignment based off early posts
Why?

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:58 pm
by Knight Beige
In post 132, Knight Azure wrote:
In post 129, Knight Beige wrote:It doesn't matter what page it was, he made a proposal.
So am I correct to assume that you don't think too highly of Crimson Knight because they fluffed their way towards an early proposal?
Not exactly. I'm more critical of them because they proposed early and Lavender asked for reasons against it

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:00 pm
by Knight Beige
In post 137, Knight Burgundy wrote:
In post 98, Knight Beige wrote:
In post 96, The Rainbow Knight wrote:What do you not like about Crimson's posting?
Too much fluff.
In post 130, Knight Beige wrote:*They made a proposal

I also disagree with your incredibly charitable reading of Chart's alignment based off early posts
Why?
I don't think post 31 is an indicator for Chart being town because I don't think that is a post that scum would not make.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:00 pm
by Knight Rose
@Azure
I think that Rainbow Knight should maybe just pair up with a personal townread. If she is paired with the towniest warm, then won't it just be an efficient Night 2 kill for the scumteam? I guess I'm wondering what your thought process behind it is. I'm not super sure myself.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:01 pm
by Knight Beige
In post 135, Knight Azure wrote:Oh yeah one more thing.
Since there are second pair makings in progress, we should try (I say try because lol4days) to come to consensus about who should be Rainbow Knight's partner. I'd like Rainbow Knight to be paired with the towniest warm knight possible.
Is this because of their role?

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:02 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Yeah. I think pairing the role with town does something nice or at least interesting for town.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:04 pm
by Knight Rose
Darn :(
In post 138, Knight Beige wrote:Lavender asked for reasons against it
Wdym by this?

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:15 pm
by Ydrasse
"Dearest me, what is that!? That is no Knight!"


GuyInFreezer, formerly Knight Azure, has been replaced. As you know this now, you may discuss it if you wish. Please do not speak of the new Knight Azure's identity. Thank you!

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:16 pm
by Knight Crimson
Lavender
is the charming, graceful and levelheaded partner I lie awake at night longing for. I will cherish every last moment we share.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:16 pm
by Knight Beige
In post 66, Knight Lavender wrote:If anyone should object to holy matrimony, speak now, or forever hold your peace (until the voting period, should you be so uncouth as to want to harm my innocent and charming mate)
I was speaking out against Crimson due to this post. I did have issues with it.

People who are saying "it was only page 4" are missing the point.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:19 pm
by Knight Crimson
I personally recommend using a wildly different site theme from you main, as well as a separate browser in order to avoid meeting the same fate.

I am bummed about
Knight Azure
.
In post 146, Knight Beige wrote:
In post 66, Knight Lavender wrote:If anyone should object to holy matrimony, speak now, or forever hold your peace (until the voting period, should you be so uncouth as to want to harm my innocent and charming mate)
I was speaking out against Crimson due to this post. I did have issues with it.

People who are saying "it was only page 4" are missing the point.
I must admit I am a little unsure what you mean by having an issue with me due to a post of
Lavender's
.

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:19 pm
by SirCakez
Bye gif ;(

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:20 pm
by SirCakez
FUCK