Page 6 of 49
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:14 pm
by MegAzumarill
You can take two if you give why you want Gamma to die immediately.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:16 pm
by Enchant
Life is pain. But it seems too early for quickhammers.
NM, maybe a little after.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:18 pm
by Roden
An unannounced E-1 is always anti-town, but doing it after everyone was warned of a potential NM quick hammer is even worse. Plus I just don't like how redtea is trying to turn their misunderstanding around onto me.
If you're scum then ok, but I don't see how any townie is supposed to know that without a N0 guilty, nothing has happened yet to reasonably say anyone should get hammered.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:19 pm
by Roden
Also Enchant wtf are you doing
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:20 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 127, Roden wrote:
An unannounced E-1 is always anti-town,
but doing it after everyone was warned of a potential NM quick hammer is even worse.
Plus I just don't like how redtea is trying to turn their misunderstanding around onto me.
If you're scum then ok, but I don't see how any townie is supposed to know that without a N0 guilty, nothing has happened yet to reasonably say anyone should get hammered.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:22 pm
by Enchant
I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:26 pm
by Roden
In post 129, MegAzumarill wrote: In post 127, Roden wrote:
An unannounced E-1 is always anti-town,
but doing it after everyone was warned of a potential NM quick hammer is even worse.
Plus I just don't like how redtea is trying to turn their misunderstanding around onto me.
If you're scum then ok, but I don't see how any townie is supposed to know that without a N0 guilty, nothing has happened yet to reasonably say anyone should get hammered.
Why the strike?
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:27 pm
by Roden
In post 130, Enchant wrote:
I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.
Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:29 pm
by Enchant
In post 132, Roden wrote: In post 130, Enchant wrote:
I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.
Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?
Why not?
Idk, honestly. Seems like i turned in wimp with high empathy when i am sleepy. Mostly i really don't care.
Why i am not sleeping?
Weeeeeeell! I need to go now seems.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:29 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 131, Roden wrote: In post 129, MegAzumarill wrote: In post 127, Roden wrote:
An unannounced E-1 is always anti-town,
but doing it after everyone was warned of a potential NM quick hammer is even worse.
Plus I just don't like how redtea is trying to turn their misunderstanding around onto me.
If you're scum then ok, but I don't see how any townie is supposed to know that without a N0 guilty, nothing has happened yet to reasonably say anyone should get hammered.
Why the strike?
Redtea vote predated the warning about N_M hammer
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:30 pm
by PenguinPower
tbf that should be common knowledge
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:34 pm
by Roden
Ok yeah, the warning did happen right after. But also yeah most people should know NM's reputation by this point.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:37 pm
by redtea
is gamma flipped or not
UNVOTE:
at work will be back later
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 12:38 pm
by Roden
In post 133, Enchant wrote: In post 132, Roden wrote: In post 130, Enchant wrote:
I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.
Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?
Why not?
Idk, honestly. Seems like i turned in wimp with high empathy when i am sleepy. Mostly i really don't care.
Why i am not sleeping?
Weeeeeeell! I need to go now seems.
Because a page 5 quick hammer is almost always bad.
Quick hammers without a claim are also almost always bad.
Even if Gamma flipped scum here, we'd be going into Night 1 and Day 2 with very little info. If you really wanna hammer him give it a few days first at least.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:33 pm
by ssbm_Kyouko
VOTE: NumberQ
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:37 pm
by ssbm_Kyouko
86 feels like stalling, 94 in hindsight after seeing 118 strikes me as motivated by trying to get a claim out of Gamma for free, and then 118 itself is actually just fishing after he didnt get what he was hoping for.
Strike fast?
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 1:49 pm
by MegAzumarill
VOTE: Numbers
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:10 pm
by Galron
Let 'em eat cake.
VOTE: NumberQ
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:11 pm
by Galron
We will need to go back there.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:16 pm
by Roden
I agree with Kyo's read.
VOTE: NumberQ
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 2:22 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 140, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:86 feels like stalling, 94 in hindsight after seeing 118 strikes me as motivated by trying to get a claim out of Gamma for free, and then 118 itself is actually just fishing after he didnt get what he was hoping for.
Strike fast?
86 94 118
sigh
please use post tags when referencing specific posts as a public service to everyone....plskthx
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:06 pm
by numberQ
Definitely at least one scum on that quick wagon. Not sure if it's ssbm or if she just has bad reads. 86 is the exact opposite of stalling, so if you're going to SR me for it at least try to be consistent. The vote in 94 was what, E-3? In no world is that claim fishing. 118 was such an obvious joke that if it somehow did get Gamma to claim otherwise, I'd say we deserve whatever we get coming to us for it.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:18 pm
by Roden
Who's the scum on your wagon?
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:20 pm
by numberQ
/shrug, most of the votes were pretty opportunistic, including yours. I think this wagon is going to be one piece of evidence to help expose them later, whoever it is.
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:28 pm
by Roden
You say we're oppotunistic for voting you. By those same standards, do you not consider your own votes and pushes opportunistic?
In post 50, numberQ wrote:Well it says "Mafia Scum" under Roden's username so I think you're onto something.
VOTE: Roden
In post 94, numberQ wrote:VOTE: Gamma
He said there was nothing important to discuss so let's make something to discuss.