I'm much of this same opinion for the first few pages but vanderscamp pings town.In post 115, Greeting wrote:I have read all of the posts so far and they're NAI to be fair.
Anahit too although less so
I'm much of this same opinion for the first few pages but vanderscamp pings town.In post 115, Greeting wrote:I have read all of the posts so far and they're NAI to be fair.
I think it says a lot that before posting the "conclusion," I thought that the point of that post was a town lean on hatter, but the conclusion is that we should keep an eye there.In post 109, mc esther wrote:ive definitely been that hedgy and got that defensive over it as town before. perhaps this is an unreasonable extrapolation -- just because i hedge as town, doesnt mean it's not a legitimate tell for most players -- but yeah ive always been skeptical of [especially early-game] hedginess as a "real" scumread.
what's more questionable to me is the way that their [rather inconclusive] conclusion is kinda phrased as an fos, but not accompanied by a vote. it's not like flame doesnt believe in frivolous votes, they did an rvs.
idk i still kinda wanna wagon greeting rn, but if that's not happening, sure, flame could be fun.
I think this is an exceptionally poor (not scummy) read to read that as town from Eden, especially since Eden does not go on to say anything of value or provide a suggested target for any kind of focus.In post 121, anahit wrote:it is like, unless i was focused on a partner of edensflame's (so somewhere in {ahri, mad hatters tea party, greeting(?)}) then i think edensflame more or less telling me to try not to get distracted/focus on relevant things/not waste time is probably +townIn post 111, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: Edens flameIn post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.
Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter
This post is basically a bunch of words that means nothing
right outside of the partner being focused on that seems kinda unlikely to come from mafia to me? does that make sense
do you do you do youIn post 128, Vanderscamp wrote:I think this is an exceptionally poor (not scummy) read to read that as town from Eden, especially since Eden does not go on to say anything of value or provide a suggested target for any kind of focus.
In post 94, Vanderscamp wrote:VOTE: EdensFlameIn post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.
Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter
This is a scummily noncommittal take
In post 95, EdensFlame wrote:You expect me to be able to commit on another players alignment on page 3?
In post 106, Isis wrote:I also found it salient that Edensflame's post was super hedgy but it's almost so excessively hedgey it doesn't count as being scummy the way hedging generally is? And I don't directly see scum benefit.
A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.In post 109, mc esther wrote:ive definitely been that hedgy and got that defensive over it as town before. perhaps this is an unreasonable extrapolation -- just because i hedge as town, doesnt mean it's not a legitimate tell for most players -- but yeah ive always been skeptical of [especially early-game] hedginess as a "real" scumread.
what's more questionable to me is the way that their [rather inconclusive] conclusion is kinda phrased as an fos, but not accompanied by a vote. it's not like flame doesnt believe in frivolous votes, they did an rvs.
idk i still kinda wanna wagon greeting rn, but if that's not happening, sure, flame could be fun.
The intent of the discussion was so I could attempt to ascertain your allegiance as ally or adversary. I do not trust you to lead this voyage and guide myself to the rightful conclusions, however, your allegiance is undetermined as yet.In post 116, anahit wrote:it is likeIn post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:Ani your judgement currently remains to be decided, I do not trust you, and I was rather hoping that your brilliance would shine as white as moon against the darkest skies which is part of why the challenges were laid out as they were.
i really do not understand the expectation of me - like, 'i do not trust you! but also i was hoping your brilliance would shine so brightly!'
i am not even sure whether or not you are saying you do not trust that i am town or that you do not trust me to find the mafia or both
I refer to myself as mad, I would not be so rude as to infer madness upon another. It is one thing for one as I to own the title that I claimed, it is quite another for one to bestow such a title upon another.In post 116, anahit wrote:i guess the 'mad' part of this can likely be applied to me though i guess maybe i would rather we didn'tIn post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:The machinations of the mind are quite marvellous. Even more so when one is mad or malicious.
but,
the malicious part kinda feels like you're just trying to be like, 'i do not know your alignment anahit!!!!'
I do not believe we have held the honours of your being prior to this venture, and sadly I must confess the works of the artist you quote stand unbeknownst to us.In post 116, anahit wrote:hmIn post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:I do fear you missed the pun regarding Art and Party.i assumed you were showing familiarity with me and how i play with the should you attempt to come to the art of the vote bit, which was then furthered by the my finding you to be a colourful affair outside of these realms, ie, from past lives; or so i thoughtIn post 68, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:Though I daresay should you attempt to come to the 'art of the vote you find the Mad Hatters Tea Party to always be a colourful affair outside these realms.
i also assumed the bolded art to be an intentional misdirect as it seemed unlikely to me that you were either the account art or someone i had talked to at great length about art as that list is not particularly long
though it could easily have been a more passing reference to someone i had a minor interaction with about art at some point as that list is rather long
oh! i think maybe your fear that i missed the pun was due to the anne boyer quote:not including how that section of the poem ends:
i got nearer to death, as did you
but also it is quite possible you are trying to communicate something else entirely to me, and, uh, i have been trying to turn off the subtext thing as much as i can because like, i quickly begin connecting everything into one very very large ball - here is my one night stand spectator pt iso so you can see what happens when i do not turn this off
In post 133, Isis wrote:my feeling is kind of that Edensflame doesn't want to appease anyone
In post 130, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.
it is like,In post 134, anahit wrote:In post 133, Isis wrote:my feeling is kind of that Edensflame doesn't want to appease anyoneIn post 130, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.
but also i very much appreciate the way vanderscamp explained to me why they thought my thoughts with regards to edensflame were not correct and i should probably note that as wellIn post 135, anahit wrote:it is like,In post 134, anahit wrote:In post 133, Isis wrote:my feeling is kind of that Edensflame doesn't want to appease anyoneIn post 130, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.
vanderscamp suspects edensflame and votes
edensflame issues townread of vanderscamp
so curious if this is what vanderscamp thinks
of edensflame's posts
With the recent townread on me?In post 129, anahit wrote:do you do you do youIn post 128, Vanderscamp wrote:I think this is an exceptionally poor (not scummy) read to read that as town from Eden, especially since Eden does not go on to say anything of value or provide a suggested target for any kind of focus.
think edensflame is trying to appease you?
honestly, idk if i actually believe that. i mostly just wanted a counterwagon, and felt that greeting was as good a shot as any for the purpose (partly because i'd misread the thread, oops). i probably shouldve voted ahri, but whatever.In post 119, anahit wrote:b! if you think greeting is currently the most likely mafia do you not think there is some equity between greeting and vanderscamp?
? doesnt "not how i'd imagine scum" imply "to green"? idg the strike hereIn post 138, EdensFlame wrote:Anahit isn't approaching my slot how I'd imagine scum doing which isn't conclusive but points stronglytoaway from green.
Basic shoes can be the classiest shoes.In post 105, Isis wrote:I don't really remember liking any of Tory Burch's shoes, I'm basic and wear Rothy's
buddy can we get something to happen sometime soon.In post 141, Dwlee99 wrote:Best post worst post not happening btw sorry