Mafiascum.net

In post 115, Greeting wrote:I have read all of the posts so far and they're NAI to be fair.

In post 109, mc esther wrote:ive definitely been that hedgy and got that defensive over it as town before. perhaps this is an unreasonable extrapolation -- just because i hedge as town, doesnt mean it's not a legitimate tell for most players -- but yeah ive always been skeptical of [especially early-game] hedginess as a "real" scumread.

what's more questionable to me is the way that their [rather inconclusive] conclusion is kinda phrased as an fos, but not accompanied by a vote. it's not like flame doesnt believe in frivolous votes, they did an rvs.

idk i still kinda wanna wagon greeting rn, but if that's not happening, sure, flame could be fun.

In post 121, anahit wrote:

In post 111, SirCakez wrote:

In post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.

Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter

VOTE: Edens flame
This post is basically a bunch of words that means nothing

it is like, unless i was focused on a partner of edensflame's (so somewhere in {ahri, mad hatters tea party, greeting(?)}) then i think edensflame more or less telling me to try not to get distracted/focus on relevant things/not waste time is probably +town

right outside of the partner being focused on that seems kinda unlikely to come from mafia to me? does that make sense

In post 128, Vanderscamp wrote:I think this is an exceptionally poor (not scummy) read to read that as town from Eden, especially since Eden does not go on to say anything of value or provide a suggested target for any kind of focus.

In post 94, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 90, EdensFlame wrote:I agree more posting is good for town, although one big part of it is not wasting time talking about parts that are less relevant.
I'm not entirely sure Mad Hatter's talk so far is genuine, but I'm not discounting the possibility.
Don't find it likely scum would draw that attention to themselves early, but it's possible.

Conclusion: I think I should keep an eye on the Hatter

VOTE: EdensFlame

This is a scummily noncommittal take

In post 95, EdensFlame wrote:You expect me to be able to commit on another players alignment on page 3?

In post 106, Isis wrote:I also found it salient that Edensflame's post was super hedgy but it's almost so excessively hedgey it doesn't count as being scummy the way hedging generally is? And I don't directly see scum benefit.

In post 109, mc esther wrote:ive definitely been that hedgy and got that defensive over it as town before. perhaps this is an unreasonable extrapolation -- just because i hedge as town, doesnt mean it's not a legitimate tell for most players -- but yeah ive always been skeptical of [especially early-game] hedginess as a "real" scumread.

what's more questionable to me is the way that their [rather inconclusive] conclusion is kinda phrased as an fos, but not accompanied by a vote. it's not like flame doesnt believe in frivolous votes, they did an rvs.

idk i still kinda wanna wagon greeting rn, but if that's not happening, sure, flame could be fun.

In post 116, anahit wrote:

In post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:Ani your judgement currently remains to be decided, I do not trust you, and I was rather hoping that your brilliance would shine as white as moon against the darkest skies which is part of why the challenges were laid out as they were.

it is like

i really do not understand the expectation of me - like, 'i do not trust you! but also i was hoping your brilliance would shine so brightly!'

i am not even sure whether or not you are saying you do not trust that i am town or that you do not trust me to find the mafia or both

In post 116, anahit wrote:

In post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:The machinations of the mind are quite marvellous. Even more so when one is mad or malicious.

i guess the 'mad' part of this can likely be applied to me though i guess maybe i would rather we didn't

but,

the malicious part kinda feels like you're just trying to be like, 'i do not know your alignment anahit!!!!'

In post 116, anahit wrote:

In post 91, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:I do fear you missed the pun regarding Art and Party.

hm

In post 68, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:Though I daresay should you attempt to come to the 'art of the vote you find the Mad Hatters Tea P

art

y to always be a colourful affair outside these realms.

i assumed you were showing familiarity with me and how i play with the should you attempt to come to the art of the vote bit, which was then furthered by the my finding you to be a colourful affair outside of these realms, ie, from past lives; or so i thought

i also assumed the bolded art to be an intentional misdirect as it seemed unlikely to me that you were either the account art or someone i had talked to at great length about art as that list is not particularly long

though it could easily have been a more passing reference to someone i had a minor interaction with about art at some point as that list is rather long

oh! i think maybe your fear that i missed the pun was due to the anne boyer quote:

In post 80, anahit wrote:

i have done so much to be ordinary and made a record of this

not including how that section of the poem ends:

i got nearer to death, as did you

but also it is quite possible you are trying to communicate something else entirely to me, and, uh, i have been trying to turn off the subtext thing as much as i can because like, i quickly begin connecting everything into one very very large ball - here is my one night stand spectator pt iso so you can see what happens when i do not turn this off

In post 133, Isis wrote:my feeling is kind of that Edensflame doesn't want to appease anyone

In post 130, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.

In post 134, anahit wrote:

In post 133, Isis wrote:my feeling is kind of that Edensflame doesn't want to appease anyone

In post 130, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.

In post 135, anahit wrote:

In post 134, anahit wrote:

In post 133, Isis wrote:my feeling is kind of that Edensflame doesn't want to appease anyone

In post 130, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:A most curious compilation of concerning considerations.

it is like,

vanderscamp suspects edensflame and votes
edensflame issues townread of vanderscamp
so curious if this is what vanderscamp thinks
of edensflame's posts

In post 129, anahit wrote:

In post 128, Vanderscamp wrote:I think this is an exceptionally poor (not scummy) read to read that as town from Eden, especially since Eden does not go on to say anything of value or provide a suggested target for any kind of focus.

do you do you do you

think edensflame is trying to appease you?

In post 119, anahit wrote:b! if you think greeting is currently the most likely mafia do you not think there is some equity between greeting and vanderscamp?

In post 138, EdensFlame wrote:Anahit isn't approaching my slot how I'd imagine scum doing which isn't conclusive but points strongly

to

away from green.

In post 105, Isis wrote:I don't really remember liking any of Tory Burch's shoes, I'm basic and wear Rothy's

In post 141, Dwlee99 wrote:Best post worst post not happening btw sorry