Page 6 of 168
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:32 am
by Aristeia
In post 123, Ausuka wrote:Not really? Read the scum PT I linked, they were explicitly trying to be the highest numbers and succeeded.
ok and did they then knowing that they were the three biggest numbers decide to jump into the thread and say "hey we should be townread because we are the three biggest numbers?"
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:32 am
by Aristeia
picking 18-20-42
is very different from picking
512 - 80085 - 9999999999999999999999
I'll let you figure out why.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:38 am
by Ausuka
Again, they were trying to pick large numbers, and they were the three highest numbers in practice. The mindset in the scum PT is far more important than the specific numbers they chose. Obviously I'm not saying this game is an exact replica of that game - I'm saying that the argument 'this would stand out and be suboptimal, therefore scum didn't do it' is wrong
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:38 am
by humaneatingmonkey
im excited to move on from this numbers discussion. i can't get a decent reads out of it
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:43 am
by Ausuka
feel free to propose an alternative
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:48 am
by Bellaphant
This is why I called it busy work. Honestly I'm townread ing delete, I mean dweelee, just for replying with repeated numbers
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:50 am
by humaneatingmonkey
okay
we have an ari wagon. does everybody feel the same way that she was creating a false setup spec narrative that high numbers are town wherein she also chose a high number? especially sus since i dont think it's even good town strategy to choose high numbers.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:52 am
by humaneatingmonkey
personally, i chose 80085 because i have personal sentimental memories associated with it. not because it would be good strategy.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:55 am
by Aristeia
so you're voting me for picking a high number even though you picked a higher number?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:56 am
by Aristeia
that's an interesting thought process
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:57 am
by humaneatingmonkey
i voted you because it felt off that you are declaring that high numbers are town based on setup spec, and in an extension you, without regard for how accurate that statement would be.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 2:59 am
by humaneatingmonkey
In post 133, Aristeia wrote:so you're voting me for picking a high number even though you picked a higher number?
was i unclear or did you just try to misrep me right in front of my face? i hope it's not the latter. the disrespect.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:02 am
by Harley Quinn
In post 131, humaneatingmonkey wrote:okay
we have an ari wagon. does everybody feel the same way that she was creating a false setup spec narrative that high numbers are town wherein she also chose a high number? especially sus since i dont think it's even good town strategy to choose high numbers.
If she did that as more of a joke, it probably wouldn’t be too concerning.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:03 am
by humaneatingmonkey
i agree. don't know if it's a joke or not. i voted the moment i had the feeling. but now we have a wagon. not sure where others are.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:04 am
by Harley Quinn
In post 109, Aristeia wrote:
not everyone has even responded or even put down 3 numbers
i see no point in explaining my thought process if people are unwilling to do a fairly simple task
What was your reasoning behind this exercise?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:06 am
by Aristeia
In post 136, humaneatingmonkey wrote: In post 133, Aristeia wrote:so you're voting me for picking a high number even though you picked a higher number?
was i unclear or did you just try to misrep me right in front of my face? i hope it's not the latter. the disrespect.
your post speaks for itself sir.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:08 am
by Harley Quinn
In post 4, Datisi wrote:the draft phase is over.
the order of the draft is as follows:
| Enchant | 1 |
| Ausuka | 2 |
| Harley Quinn | 7 |
| Bellaphant | 9 |
| Gamma Emerald | 14 |
| implosion | 16 |
| Malakittens | 216 |
| Aristeia | 512 |
| humaneatingmonkey | 80085 |
| Titus | 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 |
| Dwlee99 | 4 |
| Roden | 4 |
| Save The Dragons | 8 |
| Klick | 8 |
the mafia have selected the
informed
modifier - at the end of the second draft phase, the scumteam will receive a piece of information about the draft. if there are any role pairings which were not taken during the draft, the scumteam will be informed of one of these pairings. if there are multiple, they will be informed of one at random. if all role pairings were taken during the draft, the scumteam will be informed of this.
the role bidding phase begins now. for your convenience, i have also included the possible role choices below:
please pm me
the specific role
you wish to be. you have about 48 hours to do so.
Another main problem with her theory is that only 4 people even chose high numbers, so what was even the point?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:10 am
by Harley Quinn
In post 140, Aristeia wrote: In post 136, humaneatingmonkey wrote: In post 133, Aristeia wrote:so you're voting me for picking a high number even though you picked a higher number?
was i unclear or did you just try to misrep me right in front of my face? i hope it's not the latter. the disrespect.
your post speaks for itself sir.
???
No one but you is making this an issue.
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:21 am
by Aristeia
what do you mean?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:22 am
by Aristeia
I don't understand what you mean by "only four people"
would a different number of people make my theory more or less valid?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:24 am
by Harley Quinn
The whole picking higher numbers is somehow town indicative and it’s a good idea to auto PoE in the lower numbers. That is what you’ve been saying, correct?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:26 am
by Harley Quinn
In post 144, Aristeia wrote:I don't understand what you mean by "only four people"
would a different number of people make my theory more or less valid?
Sure, because 7/11 picked lower numbers, so I don’t see your theory as helpful or why you’re defending it so strongly?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:27 am
by Aristeia
In post 145, Harley Quinn wrote:
The whole picking higher numbers is somehow town indicative and it’s a good idea to auto PoE in the lower numbers. That is what you’ve been saying, correct?
yes
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:30 am
by Aristeia
In post 146, Harley Quinn wrote: In post 144, Aristeia wrote:I don't understand what you mean by "only four people"
would a different number of people make my theory more or less valid?
Sure, because 7/11 picked lower numbers, so I don’t see your theory as helpful or why you’re defending it so strongly?
9/13
why is it not helpful to rule out 4 players if they are all actually town?
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2022 3:35 am
by Harley Quinn
In post 148, Aristeia wrote: In post 146, Harley Quinn wrote: In post 144, Aristeia wrote:I don't understand what you mean by "only four people"
would a different number of people make my theory more or less valid?
Sure, because 7/11 picked lower numbers, so I don’t see your theory as helpful or why you’re defending it so strongly?
9/13
why is it not helpful to rule out 4 players if they are all actually town?
Because it’s a bad metric as Ausuka has already pointed out.
Make reads based off of posting not numbers.