Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:27 am
VOTE: gamma
it doesn't seem that hard to understand, honestly. later in the game when we actually have a few flips we can probably make more definitive statements (or at the very least more informed statements) about the position of scum within the number picks. i guess to be fair i said "later on we can get into the WIFOM" when really what i just meant is later on we can get into the subject of the number picks at all, not necessarily just the subject of whether scum repeated their picks (to which again the answer is basically always: no they didn't).In post 119, Dannflor wrote:isn't it always going to be a waste of time then? I don't really get what you mean hereIn post 97, northsidegal wrote:later on we can get into the WIFOM of whether or not scum picked the same number (to which the answer is typically no) but for now it's probably a waste of attention.
also how did you get a town read out of NK15's 1 post
because you spoke about other people but didn't actually provide reasoning for your vote, penguins was basically just a naked voteIn post 121, northsidegal wrote:why especially me?In post 109, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before things go to far, just wanna mention to not let Penguin or especially nsg slide without justifying their votes on me
and why direct other people to do this and not just do it yourself?
In post 131, Dannflor wrote:like I feel you're overly worried about the seriousness of a page 5 wagon on you
i'm of the belief that someone singling out one read from a set of reads and asking for justification for that is probably more likely to come from town. i think that it's indicative of a genuine underlying thought process: as though one has read through the thread, can at least see the justification for all of the rest of the reads, but can't see the reasoning for one of them. i imagine that scum trying to ask a question just to ask a question would be less likely to single out a single read from a set of them and more likely to respond to a post with basically only one point in it.In post 94, Not Known 15 wrote:What's the reason for Junko town?In post 89, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I'D SAY PORKENS, ENCHANT AND JUNKO ARE TOWN. PENGUIN IS NULL CLOSER TO TOWN, DANNFLOR IS NULL CLOSER TO SCUM. GAMMA IS SCUM.
In post 137, Porkens wrote:In fact I think it’s odd that you town lean that. Your explanation that you think it shows a town mindset doesn’t really hold water for me. Why would that come from town? Your explanation states:
“as though one has read through the thread, can at least see the justification for all of the rest of the reads, but can't see the reasoning for one of them. i imagine that scum trying to ask a question just to ask a question would be less likely to single out a single read from a set of them and more likely to respond to a post with basically only one point in it.“
You don’t say anything about why that is town behavior. A scum would be just as capable of honestly doing all of those things without having to fake anything. A very comfortable move for scum.
But you are also basically saying I think he is town because he did this thing I think is less likely to come from scum.
Then you shit on your own read.
VOTE: NK15 that’s a scum post.
Porkens I'm not getting why you jumped from "that's not a town post" to "that's a scum post"In post 137, Porkens wrote:You don’t say anything about why that is town behavior. A scum would be just as capable of honestly doing all of those things without having to fake anything. A very comfortable move for scum.
But you are also basically saying I think he is town because he did this thing I think is more likely to come from town.
Then you shit on your own read.
VOTE: NK15 that’s a scum post.
actually noIn post 143, Dannflor wrote:in fact i think the process is like very marginally town indicative for nsg even though i disagree
i do say why i think it's town behavior: because i think that it's indicative of someone reading the thread and genuinely having their own thoughts. scum is "capable" of doing anything that town can do, of course: it's a question of probability, and my evaluation is that the probability that town asks that question is (even if slightly!) higher than that for scum. i didn't "shit on" my own read, i'm trying to be clear about the exact degree to which i think things and not overstate anything.In post 137, Porkens wrote:In fact I think it’s odd that you town lean that. Your explanation that you think it shows a town mindset doesn’t really hold water for me. Why would that come from town? Your explanation states:
“as though one has read through the thread, can at least see the justification for all of the rest of the reads, but can't see the reasoning for one of them. i imagine that scum trying to ask a question just to ask a question would be less likely to single out a single read from a set of them and more likely to respond to a post with basically only one point in it.“
You don’t say anything about why that is town behavior. A scum would be just as capable of honestly doing all of those things without having to fake anything. A very comfortable move for scum.
But you are also basically saying I think he is town because he did this thing I think is more likely to come from town.
Then you shit on your own read.
VOTE: NK15 that’s a scum post.
Asking why someone doesn’t think something is kind of in line with what o was talking about earlier.In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?
In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?
I mean, it’s omgus, but let’s look at 38:In post 85, Gamma Emerald wrote:So, despite the statistical evidence supporting there being multiple scum in the 1s, you have somehow "ruled them out" already. Yeah that's bogus.In post 75, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?IDRC ABOUT THE 1 CHOICES, I RULED THAT NUMBER OUT RIGHT AWAY.In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
THE SHADE IN #38 IS MORE INDICATIVE OF SCUM.
VOTE: Gamma
VOTE: SCRRRDBEAR
In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?
In post 85, Gamma Emerald wrote:So, despite the statistical evidence supporting there being multiple scum in the 1s, you have somehow "ruled them out" already. Yeah that's bogus.In post 75, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:In post 37, Gamma Emerald wrote:And why do you not think it’s within JC/NM, or the FIVE people that picked 1?IDRC ABOUT THE 1 CHOICES, I RULED THAT NUMBER OUT RIGHT AWAY.In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
THE SHADE IN #38 IS MORE INDICATIVE OF SCUM.
VOTE: Gamma
VOTE: SCRRRDBEAR
So yeah, it is a weird shadey thing to say.In post 38, Gamma Emerald wrote:And it better be a good reason because I can already think of one, and it’s not a great look for you Sir Bear
I can see where you are coming from. I have a couple of points;In post 146, northsidegal wrote:i do say why i think it's town behavior: because i think that it's indicative of someone reading the thread and genuinely having their own thoughts. scum is "capable" of doing anything that town can do, of course: it's a question of probability, and my evaluation is that the probability that town asks that question is (even if slightly!) higher than that for scum. i didn't "shit on" my own read, i'm trying to be clear about the exact degree to which i think things and not overstate anything.In post 137, Porkens wrote:In fact I think it’s odd that you town lean that. Your explanation that you think it shows a town mindset doesn’t really hold water for me. Why would that come from town? Your explanation states:
“as though one has read through the thread, can at least see the justification for all of the rest of the reads, but can't see the reasoning for one of them. i imagine that scum trying to ask a question just to ask a question would be less likely to single out a single read from a set of them and more likely to respond to a post with basically only one point in it.“
You don’t say anything about why that is town behavior. A scum would be just as capable of honestly doing all of those things without having to fake anything. A very comfortable move for scum.
But you are also basically saying I think he is town because he did this thing I think is more likely to come from town.
Then you shit on your own read.
VOTE: NK15 that’s a scum post.
it feels like the criticism you're making of my read could be applied to basically any read ever. oh, you think that that action is towny because it's more likely to come from town? well, yeah, that's kinda how this game works.