Mafiascum.net

In post 1238, Desperado wrote:

In post 1234, Nexus wrote:

In post 1232, Desperado wrote:Metal Sonic does the objectively Most Bad Thing of D1,

Do you consider all fake day kills the objectively most BAD THING OF DAY 1?

Because if you do you're probably dumb.

It caused discussion and generated activity. So yeah.

The only thing it accomplished was getting him lynched. Can you point to some good discussion and activity that it generated?

PEdit: Generic, are you saying that I can't have multiple reads? I don't understand what you're criticizing exactly. I haven't even come close to abandoning it, what gave you that idea

And what is "convenient" about it? I started poking her with suspicious intent (that's what scumhunting is) and because she immediately voted me I no longer get to vote her without it being labeled OMGUS? What do you consider her vote?

In post 1241, Desperado wrote:

In post 1237, macmollie wrote:

In post 1232, Desperado wrote:So when I stop voting Nexus the lead goes away?

Yes, the case on Nexus revolves around his ISO being filled with scumreads that come from players doing bad things, but then Metal Sonic does the objectively Most Bad Thing of D1, but Nexus says he's bad but town? It's a scum motivated contradiction.

I don't even know what you're implying in your last line. I can't even commit to the vote? How do you figure that?

And please explain how that's me OMGUSing mollie when I started the conversation by FOSing her, and she is pretty blatantly making up her meta read on me? She's approaching me as if she knows what town desperado looks like but there's really no way for her to know that for sure. You know how else I know she hasn't actually researched my meta? She thinks I'm terrible at playing scum.

well if you flip scum I will have a baseline won't I

and I like to think that I am not retarded at this game and can sometimes spot scum w/o any meta at all.

want proof? sometimes it is early, sometimes it is late and sometimes never at all

you look scummy desp

That isn't what you said. You said "this is not town desp." Meaning you know what town desp looks like and this isn't it.

You

clearly

implied you were using meta to establish your read and are now backtracking.

In post 1250, Generic wrote:

In post 1238, Desperado wrote:

In post 1234, Nexus wrote:

In post 1232, Desperado wrote:Metal Sonic does the objectively Most Bad Thing of D1,

Do you consider all fake day kills the objectively most BAD THING OF DAY 1?

Because if you do you're probably dumb.

It caused discussion and generated activity. So yeah.

The only thing it accomplished was getting him lynched. Can you point to some good discussion and activity that it generated?

PEdit: Generic, are you saying that I can't have multiple reads? I don't understand what you're criticizing exactly. I haven't even come close to abandoning it, what gave you that idea

And what is "convenient" about it? I started poking her with suspicious intent (that's what scumhunting is) and because she immediately voted me I no longer get to vote her without it being labeled OMGUS? What do you consider her vote?

You flit though from so tunnelled over it I must make comment on it cos you demanded it so, to considering macmollie the utter threat.

Which is the stronger case you have desperado?

In post 1246, inHimshallibe wrote:Time for Kill 'Em or Keep 'Em!

Kill 'Em -
Dekes
Desperado
Cabd
xReckonerx
macmollie
ChannelDelibird
Ankamius
Venmar
Amrun

Keep 'Em -
Tierce
Generic
tsunami
Nexus


Oh boy, looks like death is on the menu. I need to sort through the huge for-death pile and try to keep some more.

In post 1239, inHimshallibe wrote:

macmollie wrote:

In post 1219, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1217, macmollie wrote:

In post 1209, inHimshallibe wrote:I do not like Desperado's case. (stick that in your pipe, macmollie )

then mebbe you will be able to eke out some town cred by voting him cos I don't think we are seeing town desp here

it will buy you some time I guess

It's possible, though at the moment if I were to vote one of your scumreads it would be Dekes.

dekes will get himself lynched unless he blazes into the game with all barrels firing. I am not worried about dekes as much as I am worried about scummy looking role-fishing you and terrible should be today's lynch desp.

but how sweet of you to suddenly take an interest in my scumreads.

tell me moar about how protown you are by laying out the foundation for further analysis later in the game I mean I guess you aren't worried about a nk huh.

I'm your Huckleberry.

I try to at least take some note of everyone's scumreads. Certainly does help later in the game. To that end, I should make some death tiers.

In post 1256, macmollie wrote:

In post 1239, inHimshallibe wrote:

macmollie wrote:

In post 1219, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1217, macmollie wrote:

In post 1209, inHimshallibe wrote:I do not like Desperado's case. (stick that in your pipe, macmollie ;))

then mebbe you will be able to eke out some town cred by voting him cos I don't think we are seeing town desp here

it will buy you some time I guess

It's possible, though at the moment if I were to vote one of your scumreads it would be Dekes.

dekes will get himself lynched unless he blazes into the game with all barrels firing. I am not worried about dekes as much as I am worried about scummy looking role-fishing you and terrible should be today's lynch desp.

but how sweet of you to suddenly take an interest in my scumreads.

tell me moar about how protown you are by laying out the foundation for further analysis later in the game I mean I guess you aren't worried about a nk huh.

I'm your Huckleberry.

I try to at least take some note of everyone's scumreads. Certainly does help later in the game. To that end, I should make some death tiers.

nah. you are more like tom sawyer if you are town.

you went from a scum pool of 3 to a scum pool of ten million.

explain that

In post 1254, inHimshallibe wrote:Hasn't impressed me and very finicky voting preferences.

In post 1259, macmollie wrote:

In post 1254, inHimshallibe wrote:Hasn't impressed me and very finicky voting preferences.

so why no push?

In post 1258, inHimshallibe wrote:For-Death and Not-For-Death do not exclusively mean Scum and Town, as you should be able to properly interpret. I'm just taking those that I don't particularly feel are Town and lumping them into the For-Death pile.

And then, nowhere did I say cabd, reck, macmollie were my only 3 scumreads, or did I actually call them my scumreads.

I specifically stated, in my incomplete analysis of Day 1 voting trends, that if cabd were scum i'd be killing reck/macmollie. Then I gave my opinion on which of those I'd be willing to run up. In the vacuum, Reck is truly a scumread, cabd is like taking care of unfinished business, and you would be if I were going to start barking up a suspected PR's tree.

In post 1261, macmollie wrote:

In post 1258, inHimshallibe wrote:For-Death and Not-For-Death do not exclusively mean Scum and Town, as you should be able to properly interpret. I'm just taking those that I don't particularly feel are Town and lumping them into the For-Death pile.

And then, nowhere did I say cabd, reck, macmollie were my only 3 scumreads, or did I actually call them my scumreads.

I specifically stated, in my incomplete analysis of Day 1 voting trends, that if cabd were scum i'd be killing reck/macmollie. Then I gave my opinion on which of those I'd be willing to run up. In the vacuum, Reck is truly a scumread, cabd is like taking care of unfinished business, and you would be if I were going to start barking up a suspected PR's tree.

why is scumreading cabd taking care of business?

In post 1260, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1259, macmollie wrote:

In post 1254, inHimshallibe wrote:Hasn't impressed me and very finicky voting preferences.

so why no push?

Reck's the prize today imo.

In post 1134, Tierce wrote: Tammy--no, I get the Amrun part, that one clicked and I don't think her play is quite the same either (I had a similar "huh, let's leave this read for later" Yesterday with Cabd and have since explained it), I was trying to figure out if you actually have/had a Townread on inHim or if that was just for show when I brought up the slot.

In post 1262, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1261, macmollie wrote:

In post 1258, inHimshallibe wrote:For-Death and Not-For-Death do not exclusively mean Scum and Town, as you should be able to properly interpret. I'm just taking those that I don't particularly feel are Town and lumping them into the For-Death pile.

And then, nowhere did I say cabd, reck, macmollie were my only 3 scumreads, or did I actually call them my scumreads.

I specifically stated, in my incomplete analysis of Day 1 voting trends, that if cabd were scum i'd be killing reck/macmollie. Then I gave my opinion on which of those I'd be willing to run up. In the vacuum, Reck is truly a scumread, cabd is like taking care of unfinished business, and you would be if I were going to start barking up a suspected PR's tree.

why is scumreading cabd taking care of business?

Cabd (KA) had an immense wagon on him, it ran alongside other options, reached a climax, and was dismantled. Oodles of information.

In post 1266, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1262, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1261, macmollie wrote:

In post 1258, inHimshallibe wrote:For-Death and Not-For-Death do not exclusively mean Scum and Town, as you should be able to properly interpret. I'm just taking those that I don't particularly feel are Town and lumping them into the For-Death pile.

And then, nowhere did I say cabd, reck, macmollie were my only 3 scumreads, or did I actually call them my scumreads.

I specifically stated, in my incomplete analysis of Day 1 voting trends, that if cabd were scum i'd be killing reck/macmollie. Then I gave my opinion on which of those I'd be willing to run up. In the vacuum, Reck is truly a scumread, cabd is like taking care of unfinished business, and you would be if I were going to start barking up a suspected PR's tree.

why is scumreading cabd taking care of business?

Cabd (KA) had an immense wagon on him, it ran alongside other options, reached a climax, and was dismantled. Oodles of information.

so why are you voting reck

In post 1264, ChannelDelibird wrote:You're weird, inHim.

In post 1266, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1262, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1261, macmollie wrote:

In post 1258, inHimshallibe wrote:For-Death and Not-For-Death do not exclusively mean Scum and Town, as you should be able to properly interpret. I'm just taking those that I don't particularly feel are Town and lumping them into the For-Death pile.

And then, nowhere did I say cabd, reck, macmollie were my only 3 scumreads, or did I actually call them my scumreads.

I specifically stated, in my incomplete analysis of Day 1 voting trends, that if cabd were scum i'd be killing reck/macmollie. Then I gave my opinion on which of those I'd be willing to run up. In the vacuum, Reck is truly a scumread, cabd is like taking care of unfinished business, and you would be if I were going to start barking up a suspected PR's tree.

why is scumreading cabd taking care of business?

Cabd (KA) had an immense wagon on him, it ran alongside other options, reached a climax, and was dismantled. Oodles of information.

so why are you voting reck

In post 1158, macmollie wrote:okay, laying out some thoughts and questions here.

@ tierce

I don't like your dismissal of nacho saying you were scum stalling by calling it trolling. nacho is a massive troll but he does not troll the game by calling people scum if he doesn't think they are cos it muddies the waters.

In post 1168, inHimshallibe wrote:

In post 1164, Amrun wrote:So how does missing hat change your read, inhim?

And besides, I still read macmollie as roled. I've already said it once, may as well just be out front about it.