Mafiascum.net

In post 1012, Lost Butterfly wrote: Right now, I'd

really

like everyone who hasn't to claim their N0 advertisements, though.

What's the town benefit?

In post 1238, Lord Mhork wrote:Voided, baldeagle is a bad target. He's fairly town...

Why?

In post 1245, Lord Mhork wrote:But voided. Pressure on Nero is all upside.

Maybe for the scum team. I'm a relatively safe vote 'cause I haven't been here to post so I'm "lurking" and I'm rather defensive so I'm a decent shot for your buddies cw.



Other good wagons are Mhork and Harakiri

Silly Nero pretending like I'm a good vote.

1baldeagle1 is being really, transparently town, Nero. And I wasn't voting you because you were a 'safe' vote, but I like that you started posting after I finally voted you.

..................................................

....................................

Are you sane at all?

You have to post, I posted when I got back. Its hilarious that you think your vote on me made me "come and post".

I didn't say that I thought that at all.

you implied such.

In post 1251, Lord Mhork wrote:but I like that you started posting after I finally voted you.

This is very interesting. Did you have anything else to say about the rest of the post, or are you good only going after the weakest corner?

Neat. I called you on your lie and you change the subject.

Neat. I called you on your lie and you change the subject.

I didn't lie... I posted then you posted. That's a fact.

Someone is really touchy here. You scum, Nero?

In post 1246, Lost Butterfly wrote:Voided can you just explain why baldagle is scum in like a short paragraph that I can actually read without scrolling.

I did not like his case on you, nor do I like how he fluffed up his case by including the your inability to close quote tags.

I do not like his continued insistence on painting what I do as being scummy, nor do I dislike how he portrayed my townread on you as being only from his case, as by that point I had furthered that read mainly by how I felt about your reaction test regarding your Invs. Immune claim.

As a more minor point, I do not see why town should advertise governor then or now.

In post 1247, Lost Butterfly wrote:Voided who are your townreads at the moment?

I stated them at the end of that last wall of posts. It's you and Pyro (and I think to a lesser extent Garuda). Everyone else is either null and pending second looks (muffin, BB, Nero, maybe Harakiri) or are just complete non-entities to me (anyone else that isn't a scumread).

In post 1248, morph the cat wrote:I don't plan to explain what I'm seeing this early. I'm curious to see if someone else independently comes up with it.

Very well. I would like to understand what exactly you're seeing, as I don't have my head wrapped around it yet.

In post 1248, morph the cat wrote:Discussion and maybe movement toward consensus on a few things where we strongly differ.

You'll have to pardon me for not really understanding most of what you all argued about over the last couple of pages, so can you tell me what things you were differing on and if you managed to reach a consensus (or a point where you could agree to disagree)? Don't mention it if you think that it'll spark more of that stuff.

In post 1248, morph the cat wrote:Above all, the neighborizer claim. If he's town and was able to grab it, he's in a strong position to help set the course here. He's not using that position so far, e.g., lack of posting/presence.

Why do you suppose he's not being very proactive, then? I don't believe he's on V/LA nor in a time where he can't reliably, so it seems to me that avoiding the thread after claiming such a thing doesn't speak toward PV being town.

In post 1248, morph the cat wrote:ISO me and search his name.

The most I saw was that you seemed to give him a townread based on that game where he claimed 1-shot Psych. I didn't see much else from you that led to you calling him obvtown. Was that it, or am I missing something?

In post 1248, morph the cat wrote:And I can't see the basis for either of those reads.

Pro and Upside?

In post 1249, Nero Cain wrote:The push on Pro-Hawk is crap

Why?

In post 1250, Nero Cain wrote:vote:Voided

Explain. Your mhork and kiri reads are more developed than mine, so I don't see why you're voting me over them right here.

In post 1251, Lord Mhork wrote:1baldeagle1 is being really, transparently town, Nero

You aren't exempt from explaining this, mhork.

Nero vs. mhork doesn't give me town feelings from either side. Both of them are sounding too touchy about it all.

In post 1258, Lord Mhork wrote:I didn't lie... I posted then you posted. That's a fact.

You implied that I posted only 'cause you voted me. Of course I posted after you voted me, silly. I believe that you weren't just posting a "fact" as you now claim. There's no scumhunting in posting a "fact" no, that was a pressure point statement to try and make it looks like I'm waiting for my name to be called. You keep backtracking like that and you'll moonwalk right out of this thread.

Also I'm not scum. Are you?

It's not an explaining thing. I've seen scum him and it's different from this version. He is demonstrating his thinking and trying to develop his thoughts further, which is more than a lot of the town. I don't think I actually even know who half of the playerbase is at this point.

PEDIT:
No. My 'implication' is you putting words in my mouth trying to make me look bad. And I'm not backtracking. There is literally no backtracking coming from me. You're just making things up now.

I wish

In post 1249, Nero Cain wrote:The push on Pro-Hawk is crap

Why?

I think he's prob town. I felt like the reasoning used "oh you didn't use the word obv-town yesterday" was twisting.

In post 1250, Nero Cain wrote:vote:Voided

Explain. Your mhork and kiri reads are more developed than mine, so I don't see why you're voting me over them right here.

I feel like Mhork is trying to protect you by attempting extremely crap cws (pro-hawk, me)

Nero vs. mhork doesn't give me town feelings from either side. Both of them are sounding too touchy about it all.

I'm always "touchy" wich is why I make a good mislynch target for scum.

In post 1262, Lord Mhork wrote:No. My 'implication' is you putting words in my mouth trying to make me look bad. And I'm not backtracking. There is literally no backtracking coming from me. You're just making things up now.

I wish

some random players: Nero is scum!
Mhork votes Nero
Nero gets on to post

In post 1251, Lord Mhork wrote:I like that you started posting after I finally voted you.

Nero: WTF?!? Your vote had nothing to do with me getting on and posting.
Mhork: I never said that.
Nero: You to did imply that
Mhork tries to change that subject.
Nero: I called Mhork out on his lie and you tried to change the subject.
Mhork: But I was just posting a fact.

In post 1258, Lord Mhork wrote:I didn't lie... I posted then you posted. That's a fact.

Mhork: STOP PUTTING WORDS INTO MY MOUTH!!!



Voided is pretty scummy too but I don't like Mhork like at all. Maybe Mhork wants towncred for trying to defend Voidded...idk.

Hehehe... You're funny, Nero. Do you always flip out or just as scum?

I'm procrastinating to post in here because I wanted to make a giant readslist with Empire. I'll probably post here after a little Skype mafia.

I really like Nero for town, pretty solid read for me.

I was reading the pages before and after the deadline activation.
And it is clear that scum was afraid of the conversation occuring which for 2 pages was all discussion about how town should work together.

After deadline activation, lost butterfly threw out 3 posts in a row. Now I like your play butterfly but I've noticed scum like to be active right after they've made a play in an attempt to try to control the game, what's your thoughts on that?

At wrk right now on phone, but there were more other awkward posters during that time, I'll try to bring that info forward when I get off

I want to lynch Pyrotechnics. They produced too much setup spec and prior games analysis Day 1. Their incessant arguing with other players reads less genuine and more as a means to manufacture emotion. They seem to be attacking people for what they perceive as being incorrect rather than attacking people for what they perceive as being scummy. Also, they're hugely obnoxious.

Garuda still bugs me for the circumstances surrounding their terrible vote on Klick. The line they claimed sounded fake did not, at all, and I don't feel any Nacho-town vibes coming through. That said, they do come off better in their argument with Pyrotechnics.

Nero comes off as town on this page. Mhork's arguments are very bad, but I don't think he's scum. He seems too oblivious to how bad his arguments are.

In post 1141, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:

In post 1098, Harakiri wrote:I hate everyone talking except Nford.

???

is my voice soothing

We are soothing. We are N y Quil.

-- Quil

In post 1265, Lord Mhork wrote:Hehehe... You're funny, Nero. Do you always flip out or just as scum?

I'm not flipping out just calling you on your shit.

So what happened to you liking me yesterday?

In post 1220, Pyrotechnics wrote:Oh and if anyone is wondering why this is N scum. This is fake content. He can't possibly be concerned over whether or not I would carry on my neighborizer crusade. if you look at the way he interacted with me yesterday, there was no indication whatsoever that he believed in my opinions on the neighborizer. So, why is he he trying to distract the conversation between morph and I regarding town working together? I mean Morph is doing the perfect fake rendition of looking like they're working together, and N is trying to pull up something from the day before and trying to make a big deal out of it even though the entirety of the game has sided against me on the matter. So, why is he trying to make a big deal with me about it? He's scum, that's why.

Tammy, you've been taking small digs at everyone including me all game. I'm glad I got you to finally take a stance, but it just really doesn't feel genuine. Where was I "trying to distract the conversation between morph and I regarding town working together"? That's not even something you actually care about, seeing as you're calling morph scum now.

Everyone's scum but you, Tammy.

I'm not even sure what you were trying to do with the Neighborizer thing. You had no end goal. It was just something for you to do to look busy yesterday and now that didn't work out for you you're trying to sweep it under the rug.

In post 1221, Pyrotechnics wrote:

In post 1203, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Also, anyone who disagrees with the

FACT

that Quilford is towny town is probably broken.

you and empire could form a support group. I hear there's crack involved.

I'm not even sure what this means.

In post 1225, Harakiri wrote:

In post 949, Lord Mhork wrote:I mean I figured he'd probably flip town, but he also was an easy target with definite scum on the wagon.

If this is true why didn't you use Medium on him?

that's not how medium works