Mafiascum.net

In post 1250, MarioManiac4 wrote:I'm Vt, catching up after forum was down.

In post 1258, Dwlee99 wrote:7 and a half hours. Still preferring crazy.

In post 1250, MarioManiac4 wrote:I'm Vt, catching up after forum was down.

In post 1255, MarioManiac4 wrote:@2127, when establishing fact I only need one piece of certain evidence. Someone gave intent to hammer btw

In post 1155, Eggman wrote:

In post 1151, F-oh-ex wrote:

In post 1146, Robbnva wrote:

In post 1143, F-oh-ex wrote:Just to be clear, because I think you referred to me among others, by saying "Creature and Crab are mutually exclusive scumreads" I mean that I have a scumread on both of them but I do NOT see them as partners so one of them flipping scum would be a towntell for the other one in my eyes.

Yes. So if Crabman flips scum, then we can call Creature town.
(Of course, I forgot about MM4. If that lynch gets traction, I'll support it, because Smithereens.)

In post 1174, Creature wrote:wtf

If you're townreading atm487, why you want to policy lynch him later?

In post 1217, petroleumjelly wrote:This post is a bit of a mess, so apologies in advance. I just don't have time to organize my thoughts or my post right now very clearly.

~

From MarioManiac4's catch-up posts:

->

a.)

In Post #1002 I do not agree with his summarization of Derek12's play. MarioManiac4 paints Derek12 as spending all of his time pursuing crazycrabman ("he doesn't seem to be posting about anyone but crab"), while Derek12 has very clearly been poking at other players and asking them questions. He also states that Derek12 seemed to push the Eggman wagon at it's peak, and that does not appear to be true at all.

I agree that Eggman seemed much more involved and proactive in Celestia Mafia at a glance (and see below).

And I do agree that crazycrabman claiming to have a "strategy" is concerning in itself (since by and large, only scum really think about "strategies" to get through the Day). But I think this comes down to the use of the word "strategy"; I think "playstyle" is more accurate for what crazycrabman is describing.

->

b.)

I also don't understand why Smithereens was included (and then not analyzed) by MarioManiac4. He later mentioned that Smithereens was "first on the playlist," but if that was the determining factor I would think he would continue going down the playlist, which he did not do.

->

c.)

In Post #1105, MarioManiac4 criticizes Creature for trying to meta Eggman from "1 game," which is a strange criticism seeing as MarioManiac's analysis of Eggman just earlier seemed to be based on "1 game" (Celestial Mafia).

~

While scanning Eggman's posts in Celestial Mafia (see above), I came across a couple interesting tidbits:

Eggman, Newbie #1703, Post #241 wrote:Biscuitoid: He's just giving me newbie vibes. True Neutral. (Although, claiming VT on Day 1 is a bad bad move, for future reference.)

Eggman, Newbie #1703, Post #303 wrote:Claiming VT is useless. I don't know about you guys, but as a mafioso I would never claim VT.

Eggman, Newbie #1703, Post #548 wrote:I am a Vanilla Townie. Oh, only other acceptable time for VT to claim: in "roleclaim or die", or LYLO.

From the looks of it, Eggman was eventually run up Day One, claimed Townie, and eventually hammered himself in order to help Town achieve a lynch. On the one hand, given the above quotes, I am less inclined to think Eggman is scum in this game. But on the other hand, Eggman really

was

much more proactive and helpful in that game than this one. Eggman, could you please elaborate on your thoughts of claiming Vanilla Townie on Day One? And if you do not think it is acceptable to

claim

Townie on Day One, why do you think it is acceptable to

crumb

Townie on Day One?

~

Additionally, Creature, I noticed you were scum in that game, so I trust you are more familiar with Eggman's play. Do these quotes from Eggman influence your opinion of him? Did you remember them while playing this game?

In post 1229, Eggman wrote:

Intent to Hammer: MM4

If he's town, that would reluctantly make me townread Smithereens, who I've had suspicion on all game. If not, hooray.

In post 1260, Creature wrote:

In post 1250, MarioManiac4 wrote:I'm Vt, catching up after forum was down.

In post 1255, MarioManiac4 wrote:@2127, when establishing fact I only need one piece of certain evidence. Someone gave intent to hammer btw

Can't believe this is all you got to say.

In post 1269, Robbnva wrote:I'm here but don't have much to say atm. You have been active lurking all game and the posts you have made don't make me feel better about your slot.