Page 51 of 198
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:04 pm
by Grib
In post 1243, camntsuki wrote:I think my partner doesn't like him.
also...
for real, please lynch us. pay attention to our wagon after the flip.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: camntsuki
Can you talk to me about why you would do this as town?
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:05 pm
by Imperium
Meanwhile, why do you think that they're doing it as scum?
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:05 pm
by Grib
Bluffing.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:05 pm
by Imperium
In post 1249, hiplop wrote:
im trying to make it more toxic why wont you let me, smelly!!@!!
you smell nice too friend <3
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:06 pm
by Imperium
Considering a good deal of their wagon is based on "claiming too early" (at least from what I can see), I'm not sure that they think the self-voting and asking people to lynch them is the best way to derail.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:08 pm
by Fox McCloud
nacho,
i know you probably mean well
but this isn't really helping
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:10 pm
by Imperium
In post 1248, camntsuki wrote:sorry nacho... it's already there. I don't even know why, but it rubbed me wrong from the beginning...and I'm the NICE one!
If the game's reached a level of toxicity where the game is no longer enjoyable, better to replace out or power lurk, take some time off; no reason to actively push for a lynch that hurts the town.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:10 pm
by Imperium
if you have a better approach, go for it.
if there's a reason my approach is bothering you, let me know.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:13 pm
by camntsuki
In post 1256, Imperium wrote: In post 1248, camntsuki wrote:sorry nacho... it's already there. I don't even know why, but it rubbed me wrong from the beginning...and I'm the NICE one!
If the game's reached a level of toxicity where the game is no longer enjoyable, better to replace out or power lurk, take some time off; no reason to actively push for a lynch that hurts the town.
Powerlurking until the scumfucks+MOI die off is optimal, but the other head dislikes lurking and would rather see us dead than me lurk so!
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:19 pm
by Cephrir
it's not that bad calm down jeez
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:32 pm
by Fox McCloud
In post 1257, Imperium wrote:if you have a better approach, go for it.
if there's a reason my approach is bothering you, let me know.
it's not bothering me...
fine, i was a little bit of an asshole to moi, but i wasn't just being toxic for the sake of being toxic. my overall point that moi either: is associating me with a position that i really don't have and/or thinks WAY too much of the camntsuki case still stands
i dont know how to finish this post. i'll just walk away for a while.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:39 pm
by DiamondSentinel
Ok. That self-vote deserves a lynch with fire.
Town should NEVER EVER SELF VOTE.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:41 pm
by Imperium
In post 1254, Imperium wrote:
Considering a good deal of their wagon is based on "claiming too early" (at least from what I can see), I'm not sure that they think the self-voting and asking people to lynch them is the best way to derail.
also as a followup to this; self-voting and pushing their own wagon is not at all outside their townrange, they self-voted in The Amazing World of Gumball as well if my memory isn't failing me right now
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:41 pm
by Imperium
should never =/= don't ever
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:42 pm
by Imperium
In post 1260, Fox McCloud wrote: In post 1257, Imperium wrote:if you have a better approach, go for it.
if there's a reason my approach is bothering you, let me know.
it's not bothering me...
fine, i was a little bit of an asshole to moi, but i wasn't just being toxic for the sake of being toxic. my overall point that moi either: is associating me with a position that i really don't have and/or thinks WAY too much of the camntsuki case still stands
i dont know how to finish this post. i'll just walk away for a while.
my most recent post related to gamestate wasn't directed to you, was directed at the "eat a bag of dicks" post.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:48 pm
by camntsuki
Policy lynch us then.
You will get our townflip, and we will but this game in our rearview.
I'm giving you the extra vote... if you have the juice, get it done!
Just please, god, make today end.
I will hammer Grib, DS or Snarky.
Katz will Hammer MOI, or probably anyone else except Nacho. Put them at L-1 and we will do the work.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:49 pm
by Cephrir
ohmygosh really wow i had no idea! thanks for the tip
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:50 pm
by camntsuki
PS, Ceph- I love you. For real.
Which makes your relationship with this hydra pretty complicated
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:52 pm
by DiamondSentinel
In post 1265, camntsuki wrote:
Policy lynch us then.
You will get our townflip, and we will but this game in our rearview.
I'm giving you the extra vote... if you have the juice, get it done!
Just please, god, make today end.
I will hammer Grib, DS or Snarky.
Katz will Hammer MOI, or probably anyone else except Nacho. Put them at L-1 and we will do the work.
Camn. If you are town, then remove that vote right now. You are strictly playing against your wincon, if you are town, as you are obstructing information that could help town.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:55 pm
by Cephrir
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:58 pm
by Imperium
In post 216, Waco Kid wrote: In post 209, farside22 wrote:Reread a few things.
Vote kdowns
His reason for voting reads a bit more wordy then is needed.
I concur, although I read it a bit differently. 1) I kinda felt like he was just trying to find a reason that sounded different to make the vote, and 2) He really took a narrow view on the question, in a way that kinda shut down further discussion than encouraged.
VOTE: kdowns
p-edit: What does != x mean?
In post 261, Waco Kid wrote:
In post 41, kdowns wrote:I mean I got a character from when I was a kid and that was a really long time ago.
Also I didn't know that we revealed NU roles, then again I've been gone a couple of years.
In post 144, kdowns wrote:
DS, threw me off at first with trying to get people to out NU roles but later says that we have no Night Actions or Role claims to even begin to attempt to grab any discussion. Which in my head is throwing off red flags because why as early as Day 1 do we need to have anyone make any claims to even begin discussion on who is scummy or not. Just DS' general actions so far in this game are reading more Scum than anything. Especially after getting on to Grib for not wanting to RVS and then claiming to be Facetous after people start to get onto him.
Grib, from what I've read so far just seems to be defending himself from DS' attacks onto him for not wanting to RVS.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DS
In post 255, kdowns wrote:To be fair, I was asked my opinions on the situation of DS and Grib and I gave it no strings attatched, if it seemed like it was just ramble ramble. I'm sorry because I was giving my straight forward opinion on it. I did exactly what I was asked and now I have three people that jumped on me, which is funny but weird.
If you really wanted to discuss about it, I'm sure you guys can pull something out of it besides of the votes for me because of my "words words words"
In post 258, kdowns wrote:Jesus Christ we are two days into the game and you're singling me out when there are people who haven't even posted in the game. I'm playing the game, I'm participating, what the hell do you expect me to do come up with the entire mafia team after two days of complete bullshitting in the threads?
This is your entire Iso, you have:
1 RVS vote
3 null terminology + flavor posts
1 answer to my question
1 soft defense/deflection after taking pressure about said answer
1 angry response because I'm pressing you further
Which confirms as I said above: The only time you've done anything to really get involving in scum-hunting at all was when I prompted you.
No I don't expect you to solve the game at this point. But I do expect to see you show some process as to how you are going to try to.
this seems like a ridiculously overblown case on someone for "lurking, being underwhelming". while i can see scum dressing up the case this badly to legitimize a vote that could otherwise being opportunistic, i have trouble seeing town go about such a basic case this way unless they tend towards overexplaining which doesn't seem like it's the case from the rest of his ISO
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:02 pm
by Imperium
points out the hiplop/snarky thing after three other people mention it then points to a bunch of quotes that actually don't look like defending
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:06 pm
by Imperium
In post 1092, Waco Kid wrote: In post 1066, camntsuki wrote:Dear townies.
This game is already intolerable, and it's only day 1.
Please, for Cheetory, lets purge.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: GRIB
In post 1071, BROseidon wrote:tbf Grib I've considered doing the same to get you and DS out of this game, and I've never seriously pushed a PL before.
Like, you're both being intentionally disruptive. With DS, IIRC I think he just is like that, but with you I don't have that context so...
FFS you can't all be scum, right?
VOTE: camntsuki
i also have no idea what the hell this is about; he notes three different people mentioning that grib is disruptive, notes they probably all aren't scum together (meaning the premise of the tell is fucked), then... votes camntsuki (who happened to pick up a few votes before then). why?
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:06 pm
by Imperium
In post 1084, kdowns wrote: In post 1075, DiamondSentinel wrote:I'm going to let you guys have your fun for the rest of the day. I will only vote to hammer (so don't take someone to L-1 if you don't want them dead).
Why? Tbh I don't even trust you to be the one to Hammer.
Also tbh I am reading Hip town. Then again last time I played with Hip was years ago.
also gotta say i'm liking this kdowns post
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 1:07 pm
by hiplop
VOTE: waco kid
