Mafiascum.net

In post 1249, brassherald wrote:

In post 1246, Nero Cain wrote:Why in the world would Brass think I'm scum?

Reaction fishing.

I put my top choice as ban silk, then arts research, then ban crabs. I was just driving home in a blizzard so couldn't say before

Did you have to put in a specific player for arts funding?

In post 1250, Titus wrote:

In post 1249, brassherald wrote:

In post 1246, Nero Cain wrote:Why in the world would Brass think I'm scum?

Reaction fishing.

I put my top choice as ban silk, then arts research, then ban crabs. I was just driving home in a blizzard so couldn't say before

Did you have to put in a specific player for arts funding?

No that one is just general. Science is specific

In post 1247, Titus wrote:I happen to think you are town.

or maybe you're wrong and Brass was right.

In post 1223, brassherald wrote:

In post 1222, Joey_ wrote:

In post 1218, brassherald wrote:

Joey_ wrote:

In post 1160, brassherald wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain

I want to give Creature a chance right now to catch up and post and show he is not scum.

Swaying on my Klazam read a bit.

Nero is the only one left, then if we are to assume one wagon is real scum, which seems reasonable.

Hes town

I hear you, until we get a resolution up for votes, I'm just going to remove my lynch vote. We have plenty of time.

UNVOTE:

Thanks, also im kinda bummed that only two players get to see the resolutions, and i dont understand the concept of luxuries in this setup, is there more info in the pm?

Very little, upon a reread, I did realize that Gold is somehow tied to religion, as well. It references religious gold being particularly bad.

Tithe? The in game religious policy?

I don't know that I want to speculate too much about the luxuries, it's probable that they're tied to certain civs and banning them hurts them. So it's pretty much rolefishing and screwing townies potentially, and considering everyone's confusion over them maybe we don't even know that we have them yet.

I'm kind of meh about these options, aside from peace keeper on brass.

In post 1252, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1247, Titus wrote:I happen to think you are town.

or maybe you're wrong and Brass was right.

ehhh this feels scummy
like he's rejoicing in Titus being wrong

great point Gamma.

In post 1253, Elbirn wrote:It references religious gold being particularly bad.

Ven taking a political stance here.

In post 1253, Elbirn wrote:

In post 1223, brassherald wrote:

In post 1222, Joey_ wrote:

In post 1218, brassherald wrote:

Joey_ wrote:

In post 1160, brassherald wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain

I want to give Creature a chance right now to catch up and post and show he is not scum.

Swaying on my Klazam read a bit.

Nero is the only one left, then if we are to assume one wagon is real scum, which seems reasonable.

Hes town

I hear you, until we get a resolution up for votes, I'm just going to remove my lynch vote. We have plenty of time.

UNVOTE:

Thanks, also im kinda bummed that only two players get to see the resolutions, and i dont understand the concept of luxuries in this setup, is there more info in the pm?

Very little, upon a reread, I did realize that Gold is somehow tied to religion, as well. It references religious gold being particularly bad.

Tithe? The in game religious policy?

I don't know that I want to speculate too much about the luxuries, it's probable that they're tied to certain civs and banning them hurts them. So it's pretty much rolefishing and screwing townies potentially, and considering everyone's confusion over them maybe we don't even know that we have them yet.

I'm kind of meh about these options, aside from peace keeper on brass.

It may screw over the scums too, though. None were clear to me outside of the Peacekeeper.

In post 1242, Titus wrote:

In post 1240, brassherald wrote:I've done my part, Titus, I would suggest you do the same, and lets get to delegate voting.

I am leaning towards

1) Peacekeeping Brassherald
2) Sciences funding
3) Embargo Kokchi

Embargoing me is a scumclaim. You need to Peacekeep Brass right now.

Did everyone decide kokichi is scum in the past 20 pages because I like him

Well ActionDan is producing super little content and I gave up on the hope that he'd answer my question long ago, but I am not fond of him being super low content and not answering my question the point of which was that Ranmaru did almost exactly the same thing as Gamma Emerald but in multiple posts rather than one. He didn't say anything to Ranmaru and whatnot.

Also, let's ban crabs not silk.

P-edit: Embargoing Koichi isn't a scumclaim, it's Titus tunneling and she needs to stop. If she doesn't, then it's more likely scum!Titus

This game is getting so confusing here

AY DIOS MIO!!!

Hey brass, you really should follow me in lynching klazam. One of the wagon joiners that hopped so fast into it might be a busser too.

PEdit- I have no clue as far as kokichi goes at this point, but i dont really want him leading us, thats for sure. At least not today.

Everyone is just being dumb. Embargoing me is a scumclaim, though. There is no reason to embargo anyone. And we should be banning gold.

We needed to submit three ranked.

And I chose silk as my top option because, the way it is phrased, it seems like the one that is most likely tied to scum.

Oh, they were phrased? What was gold's? So do all 6 things automatically go through? Or how does this work?

Banning gold is more important vote than embargoing me.

can you describe how all 3 are defined?

Gold always brings corruption in the game, which is why i think banning it for N1 is a good idea.

I am told I cannot directly quote it, I will also not retype it, but gold seemed more religion and greed based, might be a cult or something like that based on it.

Silk did reference the worst kind of people to be associated with it.

Crabs are said to be endangered.

I think we get the Peacekeeper from Titus' choices because I intentionally did not list it, as I cannot target myself.

I think silk will give us more information day 1 than gold, from the way I read it.

I think I'd go banning Silk and Gold then in that case.

What do you think of Titus purposely leaving Gold off her over an embargo?

In post 1260, Shaziro wrote:Well ActionDan is producing super little content and I gave up on the hope that he'd answer my question long ago, but I am not fond of him being super low content and not answering my question the point of which was that Ranmaru did almost exactly the same thing as Gamma Emerald but in multiple posts rather than one. He didn't say anything to Ranmaru and whatnot.

Also, let's ban crabs not silk.

P-edit: Embargoing Koichi isn't a scumclaim, it's Titus tunneling and she needs to stop. If she doesn't, then it's more likely scum!Titus

Why is tunneling Titus likely to be scum

In post 1260, Shaziro wrote:Embargoing Koichi isn't a scumclaim, it's Titus tunneling and she needs to stop. If she doesn't, then it's more likely scum!Titus

scum with the mediation here!

is there a mute resolution? If there is use that on Koki.

Leaving Gold off the voting table when it's said to be greed based is bad, over an embargo.

In post 1270, Kokichi Oma wrote:I think I'd go banning Silk and Gold then in that case.

What do you think of Titus purposely leaving Gold off her over an embargo?

I don't know, I think the Peacekeeping one is the best one for her, I would rather her replace the embargo with the gold ban, but it is her choice.

Titus, if you have not already submitted would you be willing to submit a gold ban as your second choice?