Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:39 pm**

That emoji has the dual purpose of taunting ducky and nom. Multipurpose mastina face up in here.

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:50 pm**

This got big real quickie. I like it.

I'm gonna laugh and rant so hard if scum team is in the lurkish slots btw...

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:51 pm**

Something like Egix + Blatant would be 10/10 meme quality

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:52 pm**

Egix + Blatant + Wicked is asking for too much faith in the meme god but i still believe it.

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:53 pm**

In post 1249, Bingle wrote:
In post 1248, the worst wrote:jeez I sure hope they realise the fact I slam dunked scum!Egix instantly is town indicative I really don't feel like being townier
obvious bus

you MONSTER

In post 1251, Bingle wrote:That emoji has the dual purpose of taunting ducky and nom. Multipurpose mastina face up in here.

you hilarious, wonderful MONSTER

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:54 pm**

In post 1252, Nibbui wrote:I'm gonna laugh and rant so hard if scum team is in the lurkish slots btw...

same lmao i think some of the lurky slots are p transparent and some are fishy
same w/ active slots

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:03 pm**

In post 1154, the worst wrote:
In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:*First paragraph of this post seemed like a pretty poor defense.
it's not a defence. it's a read on skitter's push on me.

This was the part that I was talking about:

the worst wrote:like
i'm town. you're placing a bizarrely high onus on me to do towny things. doing towny things early d1 is +survivalism and in this gamestate -sorting. so it's not valuable for me to do towny things early d1.
you're then attacking me for... not doing towny things with no wariness of what my motivation might be.

No mention of skitter here. Instead it appears that you're arguing that looking towny is at the expense of 'sorting'. And that seems like a giant stretch.

the worst wrote:i admitted like, within a page of saying i didn't see scum motive from bingle that i see scum motive from bingle. first quoted post was not serious.

Wat. Really? This wasn't serious:

the worst wrote:don't really see scum motive from bingle either rn so i don't really agree with a scumread on him but i still wouldn't say i townread him necessarily. i'm being stingy so far.

Where's the joke? Or why just say something that you don't actually believe? I don't get it.

In post 1155, the worst wrote:when you posted your readlist it was political - your reads aligned largely with postcount & noise levels, except for your scumreads which were the popular scumreads.

I see that my scum reads are popular choices right now - and I'm well aware of the fact that that's usually a bad sign.

But it's not my job to stop scumreading someone just because everyone else is. And it's also weird of you to be pushing this point so hard given that you seem to suspect teacher/Bingle too. What do you think of the people that started scumreading teacher/Bingle after I did?

the worst wrote:when you posted the bigpost i was struck that you're not trying to look for things that look towny or scummy - you're townreading noisy people and shading your scumreads

This is just completely wrong. My entire post is filled with examples of things that I found towny or scummy. And two of the people that I'm scum leaning are you and Bingle who are two of the 'noisiest' players in this game.

the worst wrote:like there's no trajectory there; i don't see how you've formed these reads. there's no sorting there; i don't see how you're trying to press your reads to do alignment-indicative things. it's a big noisy post and i think it's engineered as an attempt to look towny.

You're making a lot of vague/incorrect statements here and viewing my post in a vacuum.

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:14 pm**

In post 1257, Wickedestjr wrote:No mention of skitter here. Instead it appears that you're arguing that looking towny is at the expense of 'sorting'. And that seems like a giant stretch.

i'm directly tackling the way skitter was reading me.

In post 1257, Wickedestjr wrote:Where's the joke? Or why just say something that you don't actually believe? I don't get it.

have another read of that page, i suspect it'll make more sense in context
i was trying to build incredibility with someone for rxns

In post 1257, Wickedestjr wrote:But it's not my job to stop scumreading someone just because everyone else is. And it's also weird of you to be pushing this point so hard given that you seem to suspect teacher/Bingle too. What do you think of the people that started scumreading teacher/Bingle after I did?

receipts?
you're not parsing why i think it's scum indicative from you; a lot of us have stated and clear trajectory (including myself in this because outside of really obvious lies which i've owned up to my trajectory has been clear). your trajectory is completely hidden to the rest of us (you made notes while catching up) & you just arrived at the end with a wall shading your scumreads, asking unproductive questions & finding confbiasy reasons to townread your townreads

the fact that your reads are political and you appear to lack any trajectory is what's concerning me; not that your reads are consensus in isolation. if a lot of people have clear trajectory and consensus reads that's usually a sign that the common reads are likely to be correct. but people coming along for the ride without showing original thought process are a lot more likely to be scum trying to blend in.

In post 1257, Wickedestjr wrote:This is just completely wrong. My entire post is filled with examples of things that I found towny or scummy. And two of the people that I'm scum leaning are you and Bingle who are two of the 'noisiest' players in this game.

we're both posting a lot, yes, but we're not noisy. we're keeping a pretty casual pace.
compare to e.g. skitter, nibbui, menaphos, drdolittle to a lesser extent, who have a real sense of urgency and intensity to their posting

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:14 pm**

i'm not sure how else to view your post except for in a vacuum wicked :c there's really nothing supporting it in your iso unless i'm completely missing something

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:25 pm**

In post 1158, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:Normally, I’m hesitant to town read players with strong scum games, but I started townreading skitter during the lengthy exchange with Bingle. I haven’t really noticed anything in her iso that’s looked polished - instead it feels like she’s genuinely thinking/processing the game. I like some of the specific comments she made to Bingle and I feel like "Jingle this isn't a fight you're going to win" doesn't come from skitter-scum pushing Bingle-town.
Eh... I don't know about this read on Skitter. Though i might add that i do slightly lean on town!Skitter v Scum!Bingle, it's not like i'm ready to townbin Skitter already just based on her convo with Bingle.

What makes you eh?

Nibbui, thanks. To be honest, it kind of feels like you're giving his scum game very little credit though - but I'll look out for those things you mentioned. And I'll have to check out that Rainn game you mentioned too.

In post 1192, Menalque wrote:I am lazy and I don’t have unlimited time

Why would I go read a game myself when I can get the cliffnotes? If I need to I can always check the game (and sometimes I do) so there’s a relatively strong incentive not to lie

This feels slightly inconsistent with this.

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:27 pm**

@wick if you wanna meta skitter, i'd read skitter's more recent scumgames rather than her award winning one
i think what will strike you more than her like "powerwolfing" or sheer dominance as scum is the swift evolution of her scum playstyle

she also presents v differently as scum in singleball vs. multiball

i'm behind on her meta so any observations wld be appreciated but i'm also kinda bored w meta these days

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:53 pm**

In post 1041, Bingle wrote:He's the universal townread, yeah.

actually i don't feel as good about this as i used to

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:54 pm**

woah skitter when'd you change back your avi?

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:55 pm**

In post 1059, Almost50 wrote:
In post 294, skitter30 wrote:incidentally cj was a wolf and won,
he has a p decent scumgame
He does?? My meta on him must be outdated. I swear I thought he was scum here when I saw he rep'ed out and that's why I asked to replace in. (Would've been sweet to win as scum against
BINGLE
, but also wouldn't have been bad to shoot skitter & tw at night)

he just flaked out of a towngame i was in taht ended last week

also my standarad for his scumgame is that jungle republic tbh, (you were his partner there, remember?)

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:56 pm**

In post 1070, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also where’s Nibbui, we’re just forgettable background characters in his manga. Without the protagonist we might as well not even exist.

this is both hilarious and town

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:58 pm**

In post 1079, teacher wrote:You can have some Friday (schools out so I can focus). Enjoy the ants.

ok i'm counting on this

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:58 pm**

i'm quite good at reading cjv so i'm very sad

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:58 pm**

i think a50 is kinda townie

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 1:59 pm**

i very srsly don't think he's done anything outside of scumrange so far but i'm happy to shelf that

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:01 pm**

In post 1114, DrDolittle wrote:im deferring my scum read on teacher to skitter

scumleaning him but i need his content before i can commit to that
if the content never happens he's scum

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:05 pm**

In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:I like some of the specific comments she made to Bingle and I feel like "Jingle this isn't a fight you're going to win" doesn't come from skitter-scum pushing Bingle-town. And I also really don't think they're partners. I need to check out her award winning scum game to be safe though.

i don't think i've ever said something like taht as scum
my scum meta has evolved a lot since those games, i think

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:06 pm**

both skitters agree on 1271

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:07 pm**

In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:*Correct me if I’m wrong, but it looks like he does a rapid flip on his Bingle read from saying he doesn’t agree with a Bingle scumread to saying Bingle is outright scummy a page later. The worst, can you explain that?

it *does* look like he does a rapid flip on his bingle read!

Posted: **Wed Oct 09, 2019 2:08 pm**

In post 772, the worst wrote:lol

Mafiascum.net

Open 768: C9++ [GAME OVER]