What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.
The first few posts by Lady 4 are unreadable nonsense designed to bog us down in busiwork. She takes an awkward defending angle on Lady 5 too, when most felt the smiles were fake.
Then, we look at the substance of her posts later today.
Spoiler: Recent Lady 4
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.
*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.
Scumposting
AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes
Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.
I partly posted that because I thought the attitude might be annoyed at being called out for the wrong reasons, but mostly I posted it to be snarky.
Most of Lady 4's posting is focused on shading players, rather than sorting them. Town look to narrow their focus to find scum. She's taking a buckshot to townreads, particularly unpaired women.
This suggests my pool might not be 100% correct though. Yet G4 and L4 may not be partners. I'm still sorting that.
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.
The first few posts by Lady 4 are unreadable nonsense designed to bog us down in busiwork. She takes an awkward defending angle on Lady 5 too, when most felt the smiles were fake.
Asking for nicknames is nonsense? Busywork? These claims are not even supported by the posts you quoted. Also this is ancient history and everyone scumread me early so this isnt exactly revolutionary.
Who cares what "most felt?" Is anyone who goes against the consensus scum now?
Then, we look at the substance of her posts later today.
Spoiler: Recent Lady 4
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.
*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.
Scumposting
AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes
Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.
I partly posted that because I thought the attitude might be annoyed at being called out for the wrong reasons, but mostly I posted it to be snarky.
Most of Lady 4's posting is focused on shading players, rather than sorting them. Town look to narrow their focus to find scum. She's taking a buckshot to townreads, particularly unpaired women.
This suggests my pool might not be 100% correct though. Yet G4 and L4 may not be partners. I'm still sorting that.
Why did you even quote these? Two of the three posts you quoted are me expressing relatively favorable reads on ladies and the other is me snarling at you for incorrectly scumreading me. The assertions you're making are not backed up by the posts you e chosen to quote. And you e conveniently skipped the mid game where I got into the swing of things and started town posting. What I'm doing is absolutely sorting. This whole post is unparalleled tripe.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:56 pm
by Gentleman 5
My reasoning:
Assuming all gentlemen are here and dance, they will all be at the dance. That means one lady is out by default.
We have 3 inactive gentlemen so the pairings wont be as strong, that means we should leave the weakest ladies with those gentlemen for now. L1 and L6 arent getting a partner for now; the other two slots are up for debate. I think Im being ignored by G6 but I perfer L7 to have a partner compared to L8, and G3 regardless of your read, is here, and deserves to take a lady who is worth dancing with.
With the exception of L8, who people townread, Im sure no one will object leaving L1/5/6 out at this time.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:57 pm
by Gentleman 3
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
Honestly I have a pretty hard time seeing her as scum. She just seems laid-back and natural in her interactions like she's just trying to contribute and prod wherever she can, rather than trying to project any sort of appearance. It resonates with me because that's a lot like how I play town.
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.
The first few posts by Lady 4 are unreadable nonsense designed to bog us down in busiwork. She takes an awkward defending angle on Lady 5 too, when most felt the smiles were fake.
Then, we look at the substance of her posts later today.
Spoiler: Recent Lady 4
In post 1241, Lady 4 wrote:I reread Lady 8. A few brownie points, but I'm not crazy about her or anything.
In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.
*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.
Scumposting
AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes
Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.
I partly posted that because I thought the attitude might be annoyed at being called out for the wrong reasons, but mostly I posted it to be snarky.
Most of Lady 4's posting is focused on shading players, rather than sorting them. Town look to narrow their focus to find scum. She's taking a buckshot to townreads, particularly unpaired women.
This suggests my pool might not be 100% correct though. Yet G4 and L4 may not be partners. I'm still sorting that.
HM
HMMM
HMMMMM
Okay those hmmm are probably unnecessary but I've had a couple so I'm feeling a bit silly. Anyway I really don't give a crap about the reactionary accusations I saw, and really I need to actually read through it rather than skimming while doing something else, I mean like half my mafia career was built on being reactionary emotional town, may it rest in peace WE'LL SEE, but this kinda feels like building a narrative. And it's the narrative building that concerns me.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 2:59 pm
by Gentleman 3
I would rather leave out L2 than L5, I think L5 would be easier to read in the future.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:03 pm
by Lady 4
L2 is town and readable, G3. You just don't have eyes or are scum.
In post 1258, Lady 4 wrote:L2 is town and readable, G3. You just don't have eyes or are scum.
No, I took another look at her ISO and I see what you mean now.
Her posts are just hard to follow on mobile, which is how I do a majority of my playing. So I will freely confess to not having read all of them in real-time.
I still think L5 will eventually be readable though.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:14 pm
by Gentleman 6
L1 and L5 are good removes for opposite spectrum reasons.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:18 pm
by Gentleman 6
Am I ethically required to pretend that I don't know that having really bad takes isn't a scumtell for L6?
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:27 pm
by Lady 7
In post 1264, Gentleman 6 wrote:Am I ethically required to pretend that I don't know that having really bad takes isn't a scumtell for L6?
so you wanna hear something fun? The last alt game I played at my homesite rip every single person decided they knew at least one other person's alt and gave them a meta town read. Some of them were wrong about their alt guess. A couple were wrong about the meta they decided on.
Like i realize you think you know half the people here, you think you know who I am, which if you really knew anything about me you'd not call me out for the crap you have, but even so this is an alt game. I don't know anyone here and due to above I don't trust whatever little things you think you know about someone else. But again even so this is an alt game. Kindly act like it.
(I'm sorry if this is harsh I've had a couple to drink, and I'm a little annoyed that you tried to make me feel guilty.)
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:29 pm
by Gentleman 6
I have no idea who you are!
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:30 pm
by Gentleman 3
To be fair, I think 1264 is perfectly fine, because it isn't a meta townread.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:30 pm
by Lady 7
OH MY GODS
Gentleman five I love our new avvie!
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:31 pm
by Gentleman 3
Lmao.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 3:31 pm
by Lady 8
I'm reading. I'm trying to commit to at least one catchup a day.
In post 1005, Gentleman 6 wrote:Whatever disregard correct play dance with the hottest girl.