Mafiascum.net

In post 1247, CooLDoG wrote:Lynch hoopla

just give him some time guys, he'll wear himself out

In post 1251, CooLDoG wrote:VOTE: gobbles

good doggy

Wait, are you on gobbles wagon, because I want to vote the opposite of you

no he's not

take the planet and a few hundred deep breaths

VOTE: hiraki

makes as much since as the rest of this town is.

ohhh. hoopla is voting una, so I guess correctly.

VOTE: gobbles

wait a fucking second. i wasn't given a juice box.

VOTE: hoopla

no lynch boys.

In post 1210, AGar wrote:Bob, BM, flippy, Una, and Prana, it's time to consolidate and join one of the two leading wagons. You haven't gotten enough going to get one of the other three wagons moving enough (and one's claiming PR), so it's time to pick your preference. Hopefully it's not Una because that wagon blows.

I was on gobbledy until I was sold the idea of a Prana-wagon.
I have absolutely no trouble seeing even both of them as scum, so I'm willing to lynch either still.
Yes, even the one claiming Watcher, since I do not think that was a particularly good claim/crumb -situation.

I'm currently doing a catchup, and all of Gobbledy, Hoopla and CoolDog just voting/unvoting left and right makes me sick.
Why would you ever try and mix up the wagons like this?
Stick to the wagon you consider the best/likeliest/scummiest, until it is driven down, or a more likely option springs up.
Don't vote anything and everything.

In post 1223, CooLDoG wrote:Fuck it. Who cares. Better no lynch than to lynch an investigation power roke

Like..is this even true?
From what I've come to understand, no lynching benefits scum all the way until there's no kill..?

Something about odds and evens, can't remember exactly how it was told to me back in the day.
But apparently it plays a big enough role for people to advocate against no lynching until it's evens in lategame or something.

In post 1225, gobbledygook wrote:VOTE: gobbledygook

This town is the prime example of too many chefs in the kitchen and that is why it will lose.

I am town, but as Day 1 honor party thanksgiving dinner, I claim no part in the ensuing chaos.
But I will claim that win if we get one.

Well, after seeing this I do not need much more to move back on to you..
Self-voting is not cool and towny.

In post 1242, notscience wrote:Town
Hoops
Agar
Cooldog
Gyp
Nippyflips
Klick
Bob

I don’t wanna Lynch any of these people

Wow.
So close to being 7/7, I think.

In post 1244, notscience wrote:I’d rather not Lynch una or gobbles either.

I don’t think a hiraki prana bm team makes sense does it?

You're gonna have to lynch "Gobbles" if you're not lynching me.
Or at least that's what it looks like now.

Hiraki-Prana-BM makes sense to me as much as CoolDogs recent crazytrain-voting.

OK, I'm caught up.
Apparently we are now committing to Una vs Gobbledy, and one of us is selfvoting..?`
Good job anyone who doesn't vote Gobbledy after that.
/s

VOTE: GobbledyGook - I really think Prana would've flipped scum, and we gave up way too easily based on a claim that didn't feel natural.

This game makes me sad

By my count gobble's at L-1.

This really doesn't feel like it y'all. Last chance to flip it around to Una. No one has any reason to townread him, and I tend to be right when I feel this confident about scum early on.

VOTE: Una


I think ill go with gamblers fallacy today

In post 1267, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Una


I think ill go with gamblers fallacy today

Have you explained your "gamblers fallacy" regarding me?
I feel like you must be using it incorrectly here..

In post 1266, Klick wrote:By my count gobble's at L-1.

This really doesn't feel like it y'all. Last chance to flip it around to Una. No one has any reason to townread him, and I tend to be right when I feel this confident about scum early on.

Well, what might make you feel even more sad, is that you might not only be wrong about me, but also about gobble.

I still think gobble and prana both make a lot of sense as scum, and NOT taking any preflip-assumptions into consideration.

Also dislike your not so subtle way to tell a narrative here - .
Does that mean you are devaluing everyones tone- / context-reads on me, or are you literally saying there shouldn't objectively be a reason for anyone to townread me?

Before some other complete loon decides to dive off the scumfuck turkey wagon...

VOTE: Gobble

Jesus fuck this game.

It's a total mess to read, there's shit tons of utter worthless garbage being spewed, and it makes the game a chore.

We then have obv-scum in Hoopla trying to run up as many wagons as possible to get people to reveal their roles, only to make out the gunsmith role is 100% safe to still be used (because a scum roleblocker wouldn't want to prevent that would they?) while the watcher role is totally useless as of now...

Hoopla merely wanted to reveal PRs as much as possible. That is clear as fucking day.

In post 1199, notscience wrote:Hoopla you can’t die tonight you’re my dose of sanity in this thread

Unless we have a vig, Hoopla isn't dying tonight. Scum don't randomly kill themselves.

Prana why do you think teh watcher role is useless.

As the only difference to beign outed and not beign outed is in relation to the nk.


AS you seem to be setting an out for yourself. Let me guess tommorrow you will be claiming you were rb?

In post 1266, Klick wrote:By my count gobble's at L-1.

This really doesn't feel like it y'all. Last chance to flip it around to Una. No one has any reason to townread him, and I tend to be right when I feel this confident about scum early on.

Soooo you're just not reading the game then, I take it?

In post 1270, PranaDevil wrote:Hoopla merely wanted to reveal PRs as much as possible. That is clear as fucking day.

Lol what the fuck are you on?



We have a lynch.

Would still like an answer to 1238, por favor (I know you check at specific times, just wanna make sure it didn't get missed in the chaos of the vote/unvotes).

In post 1238, AGar wrote:

@mod

random thing, but did Klick confirm?

Yes, I just keep forgetting to bold that first page

And for the record I just woke up so that's why you waited so long for a response

In post 1272, AGar wrote:Soooo you're just not reading the game then, I take it?

??????????