Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:35 pm
I obvtowned in that game and haven't obvtowned in this one, at least not yet. You should take your chances when they come instead of after
Yes, weekends are very patchy for me.In post 1241, Galron wrote:Geraintm doesn't do weekends. Bellaphant is vla. Not defenses, just pointing out I'm not surprised.In post 1239, Hoopla wrote:we have too many players sitting back and not voting; not taking stances.
this concerns me.
Floppy and Bob, yeah. It would be swell if they were into the game.
Yes, weekends are very patchy for me.In post 1241, Galron wrote:Geraintm doesn't do weekends. Bellaphant is vla. Not defenses, just pointing out I'm not surprised.In post 1239, Hoopla wrote:we have too many players sitting back and not voting; not taking stances.
this concerns me.
Floppy and Bob, yeah. It would be swell if they were into the game.
In post 1236, Porkens wrote:Is there any kind of case on bob cause my skim didn’t pick up anything
In post 975, Dunnstral wrote:I believe that Replacement for Sujimichi looks good upon a popopo red flip, and I do want to bump-off popopopo, so why not lynch popopopopo before Replacement for Sujimichi? I believe at this point if popopopopopo flips red we have a lot of information to work off of, anyway. And if he flips green? Well, it's not like Replacement for Sujimichi or Geraintm give more information than popopopopopo anyway, right?
In post 998, Dunnstral wrote:I don't particularly feel that Emperor flippynips is scum, and I don't agree with thinking Klick gets mad there as a result of being scum with flippy
There you have answered your own point. If it feels fake it cant possibly be fake. If i was scum i wouldnt have done lazy write upto question i find rather pointless. As scum i never miss a chance to manipulate a playerIn post 1194, notscience wrote:I still don’t like bobs stance re me it reads fake as fuck
I don’t like hoops but it’s bad play to clown before tomorrow
I wanted to go for bella but hoops pushing it leaves a bad taste in my mouth
I like your posting in general
Flippys been too absent for my liking
In post 278, notscience wrote:He didn’t even go after anyone on the wagon he went after gera who literally just agreed with the wagon it’s so weird. You think he’d go for someone on the wagon because in theory assuming bob is town statistically 1 person on the wagon should be scum but he ignored it altogether to push gera lol
In post 388, notscience wrote:@hoops his level of engagement with the game. As bob said he is taking stances way earlier than normal and I take it as a town trying to be better d1.
In post 419, notscience wrote:I think he's town for reasons Ive elaborated on before and I replied to this part while im at work. I also think its naive to assume a RVS wagon that got to 5 would have no scum on it and I'm a little concerned you think everyone is town as well.In post 371, Hoopla wrote:to the people calling the geraintm "ass": is this stemming from reading geraintm behaviourally or distrusting the constituents of the wagon itself?I like this stance even though i didnt agree with it.In post 372, Hoopla wrote:when i witness someone seeing the game through the same lens as me early - though through independent means - it's often a good sign.It is damning if bob flips scum later however. Not worth talking about now though.In post 375, Hoopla wrote:this sequence is good. i think town is more likely to show restraint/concern here given a bob-vote could have easily been justified by popo-scum (assuming bob is town).I like drunk klick drunk klick is goodposting and I agreed with pretty much the entire post I just snippedIn post 377, Klick wrote:Geraintm looks obvtown to me. The wagon is indeed ass.
Yeah but Id stated in advance why i liked the wagon and i dont really think it was a secret on why i was there.In post 379, Hoopla wrote:notscience and klick were the latest adopters of the bob-wagon - both slots i am wary of.
dunnstral was the first bob vote i remember disliking, flippy being more neutral. but the fact that notscience and klick got on there too. literally the last four voters of bob were suss.
how coincidental.
more likely, it was scum-pushed.
This feels like roping in last minute to justify departing the wagon.Who are the big dogs? Me, you, Klick, Una?In post 384, Hoopla wrote:i'm nervous that i drew town with a bunch of passive townies afraid of taking on the big dogs of the game. there's only so much heavy lifting i can do, and my vote is currently hard at work.
I don't think its entirely justified assuming all the vocal players are scummy and it feels way more paranoid than I expected. I guess it can kinda make sense what with the scum leaking in to the townbloc, but I kinda want@Klickto take a second look when sober.I can kinda see it I feel like her view of the gamestate feels very inorganic compared to what i expectedIn post 387, Klick wrote:The problem I'm having with you right now, aside from coming to wildly different conclusions on almost everything that's happened so far, is that it almost feels like you've set up a narrative that you'd like today to go by, in a way that doesn't feel entirely guided by your reads like last game. I can see this coming from you as town (and feel free to state if that is indeed something you're doing here), but I feel like there's more clear and obvious motivation for it to come from scum.
As I said on that very quote you linked- there were four people on your wagon. Assuming you were town that means 3/12 are scum, and that boils down to 1/4.In post 1265, bob3141 wrote:In post 278, notscience wrote:He didn’t even go after anyone on the wagon he went after gera who literally just agreed with the wagon it’s so weird. You think he’d go for someone on the wagon because in theory assuming bob is town statistically 1 person on the wagon should be scum but he ignored it altogether to push gera lol
why did you think i would think one scum must have been on my wagon?
All town wagons are common thing in the first 4 days. So why do you think my first thought would be to scum read someone the wagon.
Yeah but frankly scum-me has no reason to derail what- based off your theory here- would be a mislynch.In post 1266, bob3141 wrote:In post 388, notscience wrote:@hoops his level of engagement with the game. As bob said he is taking stances way earlier than normal and I take it as a town trying to be better d1.
Could be white knighting
I said in a throwaway comment you being scum means he does but it only mattered if you were- and said not to worry about it until we get to that point (similar to how I was re the traitor last game!). I wasn’t actively pushing it because yes, it was flimsy and something to reconsider after flips. And yes, popo was lurking but I’ve never played with the dude and al I have was his posts here to go off of.In post 1267, bob3141 wrote:could be you trying to shade popo. You tie me and popo together based on popo town reading me. You jump straight to the conclusion that a scum me would equate to scum popo based on flimsy reasoning. When both alignments are equaly with both a scum me and a town me. You fail to take account of teh fact that popops was generaly lurking and not posting much.
Also it was quote on post you badly misquoted klick. His posts was about how he thought my wagon was scum motivated. Yet you talk about if bob flips scum.
In post 332, notscience wrote:Geras town hop the fuck off
In post 331, notscience wrote:What the fuck are you all doing while I’m asleep
In post 349, notscience wrote:Regardless I’m not backing down re gera this wagon is ass