Mafiascum.net

tops

gg is at e-1 btw

I think maybe I actually just like a lot of swift's nai posts.


Lost looks really good this game. My amusement with that tell earlier wasn't and overall read mudrecat

In post 1251, Lost wrote:gg is at e-1 btw

Or rly?

You have no idea how much my lol hammer senses are tingling. NotMaf is using the force on me.

I can't resist much longer.

In post 1253, Bambi Jay wrote:

In post 1251, Lost wrote:gg is at e-1 btw

Or rly?

You have no idea how much my lol hammer senses are tingling. NotMaf is using the force on me.

I can't resist much longer.

don't. id like more out of this game day.

That makes me wanna do it more

dang is it opposite day today?

anw Bambi what are ur reads

Still don't like Pengu, I can already tell I can't read Genius when he's my opposite and this is his first real game on site. You seem smart and slightly townie so I trust you.

N_M obviously has a lot to gain as scum by lolhammering. It is very possible that Dong could have talked things out and convinced the majority of players of his towniness. N_M prevented that from happening, both cutting off discussion (there was, in fact, discussion going on at the time) and removing any chance of not miseliminating Dong.

Also, the whole PR thing doesn’t really make sense. Not_Mafia would be unable to know whether Dong was a PR or not with this setup, at that point in the game. If he was scum, all he’d know was that Dong was town. Therefore, whether he was town or scum, he was willing to take the risk of lolhammering. Either way, if Dong had been a PR, I would vote for him and everyone else would give him a free pass, because that’s what’s been happening so far.

No, I don’t consider that part of my strategy to be rigid. If someone claimed scum relatively seriously, refused to give reads, and hammered at every opportunity, wouldn’t you vote for them? And if you would, do you consider it rigid? I don’t. Instead, I consider it to be the only sensible course of action. Then again, it really depends on the person. If there’s a single intelligent reaction and you always do that reaction, is it rigidity, intelligence, or both? I personally just think it’s intelligence.

“Textbooky,” a phrase I used, is obviously not an English word. If it were, however, it would be synonymous with the adjective “textbook”. If you claim that I’m using textbook tells, you’re heavily implying that you’re calling my play textbook by extension.

Also, if I did a single particular thing (viciously scumreading N_M), and I point out that single particular thing, how is it cherry-picking? That’s like me saying “I know what 1 + 1 is; it’s 2” followed by you saying “You’re cherry-picking information because you only gave one instance of what 1 + 1 is.”

Is there anything I missed? I’d be happy to shoot down more of your inaccuracies.

In post 1258, Bambi Jay wrote:Still don't like Pengu, I can already tell I can't read Genius when he's my opposite and this is his first real game on site. You seem smart and slightly townie so I trust you.

Newbie games don’t count? Huh, that’s weird.

Also, are you really just going to go along with what Lost says?

Yeah newbie games are babies slap fighting each other. And I don't see much reason otherwise to trust you over Lost.

In post 1261, Bambi Jay wrote:Yeah newbie games are babies slap fighting each other. And I don't see much reason otherwise to trust you over Lost.

So... playing in a newbie game automatically makes you a baby? That’s what you’re implying, but experienced players often play newbie games.

Also, what has Lost done that makes you find him trustworthy?

In post 1244, Tayl0r Swift wrote:we? since this is a joke post im going to go ahead and assume that the "scumslip" was on purpose. but i still want to put this in my iso.

we all here refers to everyone in the game who is not bob

we are all bob on this blessed day

newbie games exhibit a higher level of play than several minis, they're fine

I have seen nothing from GG that says he is town and yet it feels like this wagon is too easy if it's scum. Everyone is either on GG or is generally ok with the course of events so far. Definitely no hammer before we get MWNN input.

In post 1262, GeniusGamer wrote:

In post 1261, Bambi Jay wrote:Yeah newbie games are babies slap fighting each other. And I don't see much reason otherwise to trust you over Lost.

So... playing in a newbie game automatically makes you a baby? That’s what you’re implying, but experienced players often play newbie games.

Also, what has Lost done that makes you find him trustworthy?

GG you are doing too much stuff like this and not enough actual scum hunting if you are actually town

Lost sounds super town. Because walls of text are smexy.

GG’s walls sound like a robot.
I think my position is quite easy ti tell based on that.

Just going through the motions, bad takes etc.

In post 1267, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 1262, GeniusGamer wrote:

In post 1261, Bambi Jay wrote:Yeah newbie games are babies slap fighting each other. And I don't see much reason otherwise to trust you over Lost.

So... playing in a newbie game automatically makes you a baby? That’s what you’re implying, but experienced players often play newbie games.

Also, what has Lost done that makes you find him trustworthy?

GG you are doing too much stuff like this and not enough actual scum hunting if you are actually town

Prompting Bambi about Lost isn’t considered scumhunting?

Well not when you've mainly focused on me and NotMaf this round I guess.

GeniusGamer (5): MURDERCAT, PenguinPower, Isis, NorwegianboyEE, Not_Mafia (E-1)
Tayl0r Swift (2): bob3141, ManWithNoName
Lost (2): Tayl0r Swift, Isis
Bambi Jay (1): GeniusGamer
PenguinPower (1): Bambi Jay

Not voting: Lost

In post 1272, Bambi Jay wrote:Well not when you've mainly focused on me and NotMaf this round I guess.

I also expressed suspicion of Tayl0r. Anyway, you can never be too sure of your scumreads.