https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Uhm what?In post 1250, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:because peta doesnt love me
if he loved me he wouldve conceded by now
me getting elimed here means we lose the game
If peta is the mafia parent who loves me and commits suicide when I die. He would have just conceded the game.In post 1251, MathBlade wrote:Uhm what?
If you get elimmed it’s quite possible you take Peta with you if you’re the child.
This may just be a thought exercise
how can you say this to me after all we've been through togetherIn post 1254, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:There is no way Peta loves me.
Are you at least going to explain why more than a sentence?
I gave my thoughts. Peta's entry looks like the scum driven one. Peta had a choice on who he would go against and picked Pooky. Pooky, if scum, could have just gone after me.In post 1259, MathBlade wrote:Are you at least going to explain why more than a sentence?
Like ....This just looks like a repeat of the mason game where I bear my thoughts to you, you go no and we lose.
@Titus here you go.In post 1127, petapan wrote:DV/Math:
DV sits out the math/koba fight early, saying in 471 "I townread Math more than I townread Koba", but as the fight goes on, he starts to move toward scumreading koba when koba clearly won't back down, saying "I’m doubting you too right now" in 614. he expands on his defense of math in 697, saying "Math seemed much more focused on game thoughts and sorting things", calls math a strong townread in 789. i don't know if he'd go for such a full-throated defense of his own partner, i think it's possible mathblade is the mafia child for this reason.
mathblade townreads DV early in 419, explained to koba in 421. it feels very...over-explain-y on townreading DV for a post that was just a joke. says he "needs to see more of" DV in 475 but says he has a "strong town read" from "two good posts" in 479, and asks DV is koba is bad town or scum. interstingly, in 510 math says he backs off cakez because DV thought he may be town. despite the aerly townreading aech other, this interaction strikes me as non-partnery in the sense that i would not expect a teammate to just follow the word of a partner like that, it does feel like math was legitimately trusting DV here. when pushing koba, says if they are town they agree on DV being scum in 631, while asking DV's opinion of koba claiming VT and selfvoting in 637. interesting comment of "scum never bus" in 649. shifts to an attitude of "koba or you" in 651. then switches to voting DV in 673 "For shits and giggles". the interaction in 678 definitely doesn't look like teammates talking to each other, i don't think. read of DV has flipped to a scumread in 816. continued scumreading of DV, says he's the proper elim in 970, and moves back in 1012 after titus subs in, when the day is close to ending. it's a bit WIFOM-y, but mathblade saying scum won't bus in this and then going after DV on day 1 seems a pretty unlikely behavior from scum, especially when koba effectively threw in the towel and math could have easily continued to push there. i'm pretty sure mathblade is town
DV/Titus:
interestingly, in 928, DV says he's "defaulting to just scumreading the people who aren't talking much" but doesn't mention the absent galron. he put no pressure there when he easily could have. when titus shows up and pink votes her, DV asks "why Titus and why now?" in 1044, agrees with koba callign the vote garbage in 1045.
I still have a lot of issues with Titus defending DV on replace in because of a "static wagon" in 1017 and stopping me from hammering him, only to sheep math on the scumread in 1072 at the start of day 2. i don't see it as making much sense and it feels like a go with the flow read flip reversal bus.
DV/Cakez:
DV names cakez as possible scum in 827 but says he doesn't have any reasons. he piggybacks onto cakez calling me "defensive" in 945. that's kind of it as far as their interactions seem to go.
cakez did push DV fairly hard as a scumread, he voted him for dv's approach to sitting on the outside of the koba/math fight and taking potshots in 759, something i noticed as well. he'll probably call this a scummy mindmeld fake but whatever. called out DV for IIOA in 766. calls him out again for being noncommittal in 795. leaving his vote on there all day and never moving off. i don't see cakez as very likely to bus here, so i'm inclined to say he's just town.
DV/pooky:
DV votes pooky with a "where did you go" in 471, says "Pookie something seems off to me about you here" in 741. he names pooky as one of 3 possible scum in his pool in 827, saying he comes across different.
pooky replies to DV in 839 about being heartbroken kanna is not in the game, but otherwise doesn't talk to him. there's nothing here i would say that is really clearing, dv's vote could read as weak distancing, but i'd put pooky as a hair less likely to be a partner to DV than titus based on interactions. i have significant issues with pooky's weirdness around koba, reading back, though.
so in terms of likelihood to be scum i'd go titus>pooky>math>cakez
This doesn’t correspond to the knowledge scum Peta would have that Pooky would be the child and 1v1 his claim of Pooky is town. It doesn’t jive with a scum mindset imhoIn post 1129, petapan wrote:i think i should just claim that i'm the mafia child now? if the last mafia isn't linked to me, i die if we no elim, if i am still linked, the mafia probably no-kills.
this throw is all about satsifying your ego right now.In post 1271, MathBlade wrote:Combining that with how defeatist Pooky was day two I really think I got the scum team earlier.