Page 51 of 194

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:34 am
by Gamma Emerald
VOTE: bbmolla
this works

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:35 am
by BBmolla
Yeah okay run me up I’ll see you in like five days when the wagon builds enough for me to claim

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:37 am
by NorwegianboyEE
This seems like the kind of game where town just eats itself up by making way too many assumptions based on very little information.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:37 am
by Andresvmb
In post 1187, Not_Mafia wrote:I
t
's a no
r
m
a
l role, so it's
c
ertainly possible, I
k
ould be an
E
ven Night Weak Neighbourise
r
Well since Ranny just had to highlight it, look at the letters that were italicized in this post.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:38 am
by Andresvmb
^that’s for DGB.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:39 am
by Rannygazoo
What are the odds that only you and me and no one on a scum team saw it?

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:39 am
by Andresvmb
0 now that you had to put the spotlight on it.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:40 am
by BBmolla
We’re at 50 pages let’s end this day before people start lurking

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:41 am
by Gamma Emerald
it's probably a joke but if he does switch claims he dies on the spot

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:41 am
by Rannygazoo
Better than letting NM dodge a well-deserved elim.

I still don’t think the slot is town but I’m willing to let the claim play out. I want to clamp down on the BS when we’re dealing with a second claim.

You said you did too, but it seems you were lying about that.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:44 am
by Andresvmb
No, I was just going to let it play out. I don’t always feel the need to eliminate all of the uncertainty for Scum about a PR.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:45 am
by Rannygazoo
Let both claims play out?

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:46 am
by Andresvmb
In post 1261, Rannygazoo wrote:Let both claims play out?
Only one of them can be the truth. Either way, Not_Mafia would have at most 2 Days if not 1 to prove that they’re not full of shit. That’s job well done. So unless you think there’s only 1 Scum in the game, what exactly are you doing?

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:46 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I assumed tracker was the real claim and thought it would be best to just let it play out.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:47 am
by NorwegianboyEE
There's something to be said about the validity of claiming when not at E-1 when so many slots where defending/white knighting and the elimination seemed very uncertain though.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:50 am
by Rannygazoo
In post 1262, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 1261, Rannygazoo wrote:Let both claims play out?
Only one of them can be the truth. Either way, Not_Mafia would have at most 2 Days if not 1 to prove that they’re not full of shit. That’s job well done. So unless you think there’s only 1 Scum in the game, what exactly are you doing?
I don’t understand you said about one scum in the game. If one scum notices the claim, all scum notice it, putting town at a disadvantage with information. (Assuming there’s one scum team.) The claim was obvious, so odds are one scum noticed it. Now town knows it to. Level playing field.

I really don’t understand what your plan was for dealing with NM. Wait one day to see if he’s a tracker, then another day to see if it’s a neighborizer? That’s too much shenanigans for me.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:56 am
by Bypasser Catcher
my brain is mush and i just wanna dayvig someone

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:57 am
by Andresvmb
Except you seem very focused on teasing out the exact claim. Why? It literally would have self-resolved tomorrow if they’re a Tracker, provided they have something to share. And if they were just kidding, and the Weak Neighborizer was the truth, that would have given them at most another day. And then, you execute without even thinking about it. So unless you have no faith that we can find another target, why are you so focused on Not_Mafia right now?

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:01 am
by Andresvmb
I honestly just assumed Tracker was the actual claim, and if you don’t believe it or don’t think it’s particularly useful, then sure vote Not_Mafia again and we can test that theory. And hey, you might be right. I don’t have the brain capacity to bother with this anymore.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:01 am
by Bypasser Catcher
#mindmushmeld

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:03 am
by Rannygazoo
I’m not focused on Not_Mafia. I’m focused on you lying about how you approach the neighborizer claim.

I brought up the soft claim because I didn’t know what to make of it contradicting the other claim, and I wanted other’s opinions on it. And boy did I get it.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:05 am
by chkflip
Ranny can absolutely be shot to the sun, like, now.

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:06 am
by Andresvmb
In post 1270, Rannygazoo wrote:I’m not focused on Not_Mafia. I’m focused on you lying about how you approach the neighborizer claim.

I brought up the soft claim because I didn’t know what to make of it contradicting the other claim, and I wanted other’s opinions on it. And boy did I get it.
Stop saying I lied. My position was always that I would let it resolve itself. If it doesn’t, you execute. Where did I say anything that wasn’t true?

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:07 am
by Rannygazoo
In post 1271, chkflip wrote:Ranny can absolutely be shot to the sun, like, now.
Ok, why?

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:09 am
by Not_Mafia
VOTE: Yakety Sax

He activated my trap card