Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2021 4:31 pm
ahhhh
No, I pretty much choke when I have tried it. The only time I did was when I was jester and I felt really gross afterwards.In post 1143, Ircher wrote:That shouldn't be too hard to change/subvert.In post 1011, Amy Dunne wrote:I never ever get accused of being “fake” or “off” when I’m scum. So, that’s should definitely tell you something.I agree with Tanner here. Even if it's your meta, it's too easy to subvert to give you more than a slight town read for it. It's a far cry from obvious town.In post 1019, Amy Dunne wrote:Go ahead then but that’s actually a super obvious towntell for me because I obviously don’t gaf about miseliming anyone when scum, so you need to read me better.
He’s town as am I. I think #868 was a valid question. That’s just the way I solve. I look at all aspects from different angels.In post 1187, Flea The Magician wrote:Pooky is on my watchlist at the moment for similar reasoning.In post 1085, Chara wrote:he hasn't towntold is the short of it. and scum Pooky doesn't always get into gear right away, either. i'm used to town Pooky caring more than he has so far
Town pooky cares more than scum pooky.
Robert, not everyone sr you is scum. I think Flea is town because her reasoning makes sense as town. Are you typically this omgussy? I also think Tanner is as well.In post 1190, Robert M Hunter wrote:Am I voting your wolfmate?
In post 1257, Amy Dunne wrote:Robert, not everyone sr you is scum. I think Flea is town because FAER reasoning makes sense as town. Are you typically this omgussy? I also think Tanner is as well.In post 1190, Robert M Hunter wrote:Am I voting your wolfmate?
In post 1233, Morning Tweet wrote:Saying "Kill the people defending me after I die" is more or less resigned thinking. It's like the opposite of survivalism combined with seeming to give a care about what happens after you dieIn post 1220, Ircher wrote:For violating which policy?In post 1204, clidd wrote:We could policy-elim Robert, but meh.What do you mean by sealing his fate? He hasn't really accepted that he'll be limmed. Also, while it's perhaps less conventional to attack one's attackers, he didn't give off a particularly strong basis for that line of thought. His argument boiled down to a probabilistic one, so I'd be skeptical of giving a player a pass for that.In post 1215, Morning Tweet wrote:This stretch of posts by Robert reflects as particularly good to me. Something about attacking his defenders and in his mind sealing his fate comes off as towny to me and is a thought i have pretty often as town in that scenario actually.
Maybe not sealing his fate although Robert proceeded to vote clidd who was his most vocal defender
Hm. Sort of a pattern of Robert attacking people townreading him this game
I guess the omgussy thing I said wasn’t accurate because I did seriously consider voting him and his read on me didn’t change.In post 1228, Robert M Hunter wrote:Norwegian, Morning Tweet, Pooky, Ydrasse, Amy are town reads.
If i voted you would you scumread me?In post 1228, Robert M Hunter wrote:Norwegian, Morning Tweet, Pooky, Ydrasse, Amy are town reads.
People are somewhat mischaracterizing what I actually said. I said my frustration at not knowing who to vote for is super obvious towntell for me because despite what certain people have argued, I detest fake AtEing with a passion.In post 1238, Morning Tweet wrote:Hm, that's not a bad point. I am more.. deliberate with posting as scum and could see thatIn post 1232, clidd wrote:Which also makes me think that the occasional sudden appearances probably point to a disorganization that would be harmful to scum!he (and something that scum!he would try to avoid, but town!he probably wouldn't care much).
However, I feel like his posting earlier this game targetted Nakata (who was under fire at the time) with fairly reasonable but very easy to make observations that didn't necessarily make Nakata scum but certainly had the appearance of adding fuel to the fire for their elim (978 + 979). Idk if that makes sense. Ircher targets one of the wagons to point out some mistakes they are making, which I think may have been done to appear like he's doing something while also reflecting poorly on Nakata whilst not locking Ircher to any stances.
Scrolling thru Ircher's ISO, there isn't much that deviates much from soft stances, reasonable and very agreeable takes, n the like.
Amy you can't be obvtown yet - 1143
Aforementined Nakata posts - 978/979
Robert you aren't saying much - 732
Most of the rest is engaging Yin/Yang sort of mysteriously. Very early game Ircher wasn't impressed with Norwe and found Flea/Tanner to be town, which are harder stances than he's been giving recently
5 votes.[/quote]In post 1178, Flea The Magician wrote:
This can’t be up to date?
If this is not bullshit it means there’s scum in Ircher/Infinity/Robert as those have all had 5 votes.[/quote]
Yeah I was just going to ask that.
If this is not bullshit it means there’s scum in Ircher/Infinity/Robert as those have all had 5 votes.[/quote]Well... from the wording of the question it means that
Oh, so it's another nothing answer?In post 1268, Morning Tweet wrote:Well... from the wording of the question it means that
"A member of the scumteam has not received more than five votes yet."
Isn't this technically every player?
Also, there is zero or one scum in Amy/Robert/Tanner.In post 1269, NorwegianboyEE wrote:According to Yin:
- There is scum in Ircher/Infinity/Nakata
- There is scum in Norwee/Pooky/Chara
- There are 3 factions (Repeated twice)
- Yang is not an criminal.
- Pooky has voted for a criminal at some point. (Voted slots before post 981: Chara/Tanner/Morning Tweet/Ydrasse)
If the last part is true then one of my reads obviously has to be wrong.In post 1269, NorwegianboyEE wrote:According to Yin:
- There is scum in Ircher/Infinity/Nakata
- There is scum in Norwee/Pooky/Chara
- There are 3 factions (Repeated twice)
- Yang is not an criminal.
- Pooky has voted for a criminal at some point. (Voted slots before post 981: Chara/Tanner/Morning Tweet/Ydrasse)