Mafiascum.net

using the day 1 trustfall to probe rather than take it safe is the best option
its the same logic as nolimming day 1 or risking a mislim

pedit: "one of them" a.k.a "any"

now you can respond all you want to try and win this dick measuring contest but im not gonna anymore

Id never nolim or try not to lim scum d1 so guess its a different approach to the game

But its definitely not the same
If we risk it here and scum exit, scum have 50% won
If we mislim in a regular game, we just lose a townie

But the point stands
Why do you not put your trust where your mouth is?
Since you dont care and find a scum trustfall acceptable why are you not using your trust vote?

In post 1253, Wisdom wrote:But its definitely not the same
If we risk it here and scum exit, scum have 50% won
If we mislim in a regular game, we just lose a townie

In standart "7 ppl, 2 are scum" game, eliming one townie is 50% of win.

It's basically same, but reversed.

Which is why games are not usually 7p without some mechanic to help town

Like it feels incredibly obvious to me that our best chance is to keep scum in final 4p
We dont even need to lim them, we autowin
Yet you're okay with ruining that and okay with a scumexit just for ?

I am not sure what scumexit you mean.

Mafmen suggested we just trust someone in the low activity and it doesnt matter if its scum

Horrible idea, go think again.

Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him

feel free to correct me but i dont remember people having bad feelings about infinity/enchant/cookie

getting rid of the two most townread players is also a fucking garbage idea

Are they consensus townreads?
Are they safe to trust?

You openly said its the same as a mislim so you admitted theyre not safe

Therefore youre okay with scum exiting and you find it acceptable

In post 1264, Wisdom wrote:Are they consensus townreads?
Are they safe to trust?

You openly said its the same as a mislim so you admitted theyre not safe

crazy idea that sending out a lowposting, wide townleaned player, is a better alternative than sending out those two

and i dont know why you think you have some kind of fucking 'gotcha' moment when suggesting me to use my trust on one of those three if i think its a good idea, i dont want to leave

p-edit: arent you the one who trusted tw/tammy in the first place before people confidently townread them? hypocritical bullshit

In post 1261, Wisdom wrote:Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him

I supported idea "If you strongly believe someone outside Wisdom/The worst/Tammy is town, you can trust them"

Just pooking with trust on random are horrible idea (especially now with half of town are almost confirmed) and reason we lost previous game.

AGAIN:
Low risk, Low reward is where they trust with each other.
High Risk, High reward is where they trust with someone outside, thus reducing POE but risking hitting scum more likely.

I prefer low, but clearly will not oppose anyone if they strongly believe someone else is town.

In post 1267, Enchant wrote:

In post 1261, Wisdom wrote:Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him

I supported idea "If you strongly believe someone outside Wisdom/The worst/Tammy is town, you can trust them"

Just pooking with trust on random are horrible idea (especially now with half of town are almost confirmed) and reason we lost previous game.

AGAIN:
Low risk, Low reward is where they trust with each other.
High Risk, High reward is where they trust with someone outside, thus reducing POE but risking hitting scum more likely.

I prefer low, but clearly will not oppose anyone if they strongly believe someone else is town.

i never vouched for 'random players'
mostly everybody has good feelings about the three players i mentioned

In post 1266, MafMen wrote:p-edit: arent you the one who trusted tw/tammy in the first place before people confidently townread them? hypocritical bullshit

Tw was consensus and already trusted by Enchant, so just Tammy
The difference, again, is that I trusted my read and took the risk to progress the game
Youre not doing that because you are afraid to take such stances
Youre content arguing generic bs instead

In post 1268, MafMen wrote:

In post 1267, Enchant wrote:

In post 1261, Wisdom wrote:Good because for a moment I thought you were supporting him

I supported idea "If you strongly believe someone outside Wisdom/The worst/Tammy is town, you can trust them"

Just pooking with trust on random are horrible idea (especially now with half of town are almost confirmed) and reason we lost previous game.

AGAIN:
Low risk, Low reward is where they trust with each other.
High Risk, High reward is where they trust with someone outside, thus reducing POE but risking hitting scum more likely.

I prefer low, but clearly will not oppose anyone if they strongly believe someone else is town.

i never vouched for 'random players'
mostly everybody has good feelings about the three players i mentioned

Can you repeat for me again, please?

its a very simple ass fucking statement but wisdom always has to find a goddamn way to make everything more complex

as enchant said it is opting for a high risk high reward over a low risk low reward situation but your arrogant ass has to spin everything into a negative viewpoint

p-edit: my only message was that i think we should shoot in one of the lowposters (who most of which are townleaned) instead of getting rid of tw/tammy

In post 1268, MafMen wrote:i never vouched for 'random players'
mostly everybody has good feelings about the three players i mentioned

Yep change your tune now
Its not like you compared it to a mislim or anything

In post 1269, Wisdom wrote:

In post 1266, MafMen wrote:p-edit: arent you the one who trusted tw/tammy in the first place before people confidently townread them? hypocritical bullshit

Tw was consensus and already trusted by Enchant, so just Tammy
The difference, again, is that I trusted my read and took the risk to progress the game
Youre not doing that because you are afraid to take such stances
Youre content arguing generic bs instead

yes blame me for arguing random bullshit when youre the one who spun everything up in the first place
tw was about as consensus as enchant, infinity, and cookie are now, same with tammy

im starting to get what pooky meant by you playing unilaterally

And no those three are not townleaned, stop repeating that

Infinity and cookie have been in my final four since the beginning, tw listed cookie as obvious scum, and you quoted prism yourself on this matter