Mafiascum.net

In post 1247, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1246, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1245, furtiveglance wrote:I nearly just saw into an alternate reality where Charloux was scum but I think I've dismissed it now. But it felt real. But actually I don't think it is.

What do you mean by this?

I've described it in a slightly metaphorical way. But I was looking through the ISO and saw some sus posts. But then I saw some unsus posts. And now I'm settled

Is your thinking perhaps somewhat similar to mine here? The post I flagged a few up from Charloux - which I didn't like - is one I said felt blatantly so scummy. But I can see a world where it comes from town because scum is perhaps more self-aware than literally listing one scum suspect who is absent anyway? It's a slot that's sometimes looking so scummy to me it might not actually end up being scum if that makes sense.

In post 1249, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1244, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1242, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1237, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm still catching up but it feels like things have gotten overly personal between you guys and I'm unsure if that's influencing your read here to the degree where anyone backing away/not fully convinced on BCG who isn't obvious town to you is then being read as scum.

Bullshit.

Answer me this - do you think BCG would have been likely to eliminate a player who had what looked like a really strong read on them? And if so, why do you think they took this approach?

This doesn't really help you either way

Cool, fine, forget about me for a moment - what's your answer to the question? It's the reason I gave pause on BCG despite scumreading the slot D1 and I don't think it's an unreasonable one. And I'd argue it's more townie for me to give pause when new info comes to light instead of endlessly tunnelling a player who may or may not be trolling, who may or not be the alt of several, conflicting, everchanging players who some other players seem to have prior beef with, to actually try and suss out the pros and cons for eliminating said slot today.

In post 1250, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1247, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1246, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1245, furtiveglance wrote:I nearly just saw into an alternate reality where Charloux was scum but I think I've dismissed it now. But it felt real. But actually I don't think it is.

What do you mean by this?

I've described it in a slightly metaphorical way. But I was looking through the ISO and saw some sus posts. But then I saw some unsus posts. And now I'm settled

Is your thinking perhaps somewhat similar to mine here? The post I flagged a few up from Charloux - which I didn't like - is one I said felt blatantly so scummy. But I can see a world where it comes from town because scum is perhaps more self-aware than literally listing one scum suspect who is absent anyway? It's a slot that's sometimes looking so scummy to me it might not actually end up being scum if that makes sense.

Could this be a mythical mindmeld? Legend has it that a mindmeld clears both players as town forever.

In post 1252, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1250, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1247, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1246, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1245, furtiveglance wrote:I nearly just saw into an alternate reality where Charloux was scum but I think I've dismissed it now. But it felt real. But actually I don't think it is.

What do you mean by this?

I've described it in a slightly metaphorical way. But I was looking through the ISO and saw some sus posts. But then I saw some unsus posts. And now I'm settled

Is your thinking perhaps somewhat similar to mine here? The post I flagged a few up from Charloux - which I didn't like - is one I said felt blatantly so scummy. But I can see a world where it comes from town because scum is perhaps more self-aware than literally listing one scum suspect who is absent anyway? It's a slot that's sometimes looking so scummy to me it might not actually end up being scum if that makes sense.

Could this be a mythical mindmeld? Legend has it that a mindmeld clears both players as town forever.

It's like an inverse mindmeld. I see the posts and scumread them but understand the town logic behind them. You see the posts as townie but see where the scumminess could come from.

In post 1253, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1252, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1250, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1247, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1246, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1245, furtiveglance wrote:I nearly just saw into an alternate reality where Charloux was scum but I think I've dismissed it now. But it felt real. But actually I don't think it is.

What do you mean by this?

I've described it in a slightly metaphorical way. But I was looking through the ISO and saw some sus posts. But then I saw some unsus posts. And now I'm settled

Is your thinking perhaps somewhat similar to mine here? The post I flagged a few up from Charloux - which I didn't like - is one I said felt blatantly so scummy. But I can see a world where it comes from town because scum is perhaps more self-aware than literally listing one scum suspect who is absent anyway? It's a slot that's sometimes looking so scummy to me it might not actually end up being scum if that makes sense.

Could this be a mythical mindmeld? Legend has it that a mindmeld clears both players as town forever.

It's like an inverse mindmeld. I see the posts and scumread them but understand the town logic behind them. You see the posts as townie but see where the scumminess could come from.

Legend has it that an inverse mindmeld reveals 1 player to be mafia and also gladiates them for the day.

Like I'm looking back through p43 again (or perhaps more accurately subjecting myself to it) and not sure I'm seeing what motivation or benefit either player has as scum for a pretty silly and petty argument that sheds no new light or info on the game. And the relative silence from a lot of other players there seems pretty telling to me too - if the whole exchange really was a whole load of TvT nonsense then I see why scum would be happy to leave it alone and avoid interjecting.

In post 1254, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1253, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1252, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1250, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1247, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1246, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1245, furtiveglance wrote:I nearly just saw into an alternate reality where Charloux was scum but I think I've dismissed it now. But it felt real. But actually I don't think it is.

What do you mean by this?

I've described it in a slightly metaphorical way. But I was looking through the ISO and saw some sus posts. But then I saw some unsus posts. And now I'm settled

Is your thinking perhaps somewhat similar to mine here? The post I flagged a few up from Charloux - which I didn't like - is one I said felt blatantly so scummy. But I can see a world where it comes from town because scum is perhaps more self-aware than literally listing one scum suspect who is absent anyway? It's a slot that's sometimes looking so scummy to me it might not actually end up being scum if that makes sense.

Could this be a mythical mindmeld? Legend has it that a mindmeld clears both players as town forever.

It's like an inverse mindmeld. I see the posts and scumread them but understand the town logic behind them. You see the posts as townie but see where the scumminess could come from.

Legend has it that an inverse mindmeld reveals 1 player to be mafia and also gladiates them for the day.

Legend has it that I'm bad at interpreting cryptic posts without having everything spelled out for me.

I kinda like what Malcolm has posted today

Inb4 I get scumread for this latest post of mine because no one cares about my body of work and everyone seems to focus on the latest thing I do

hot take but VOTE: STD

Hey BCG do you like genshin impact

In post 1259, Enchant wrote:Hey BCG do you like genshin impact

No

It's not DkKoba then

idt frogster and std are paired so also have that

Okay so Koba is Town and just had shitty reads D1?

VOTE: dragons

i agree chungus!!!

Aw man I'm lost. I'll say something tomorrow

replacing charloux.

MalcolmTucker is town.

I am giving them my vote the rest of the day, no questions asked.

In post 1232, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1228, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1226, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1225, MalcolmTucker wrote:I feel like this from Kitty is spot on regarding BCG but then gives us the classic scenario of "would BCG be so obvious as to eliminate Kitty here?" It's giving me pause on the slot at least.

Don't like this. IIoA in passive defense of BGC.

What's IIoA?

Information instead of analysis. MT doesn't say anything about what he thinks the night kill actually reflects, he just points out that it's a factor and leaves it hanging as some kind of implied counterpoint against Kitty's case being "spot on."

Pedit

I don't like him going after Charloux here either.

VOTE: Malcolm

I want Big Chungus dead D3 especially if this flips scum.

your voting malcolm after all that?

lol maybe you are just mafia

people are scumreading malcolm at this SOD of all SOD's he has easily had the towniest start so far to the day like ??????????

disappointed if one of frog/furtive are town

and i think at least 1 is

>_>

This game feels like it requires a level of critical thinking I haven't consistently applied

VOTE: Dragons

PEdit

I'm on top of it.

anyways im dinnering and then sleeping

I forget some things in the game but im like way tired, even when SOD started

What a wacked out D1 strategy. At least we're winning I guess.

froggy