Page 52 of 93

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:12 pm
by Selkies
Ha! Snark has always been an occasional feature of my game. Don't go patting yourself on the back.

-f

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:14 pm
by Majiffy
Uh oh, won't be long now...


Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:18 pm
by Selkies
RachMarie wrote:That is why I thought she had a scum slot... Cause I thought DO was scum.. I was wrong...

You said you had your vote on DO/DGB yesterday. According to the later vote counts, you didn't.

Who are you thinking to vote today, and why?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:34 pm
by Selkies
Well actually fery we asked her to unvote

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:50 pm
by Selkies
Selkies wrote:Well actually fery we asked her to unvote

yeah we did and she did, but much later she said she was voting DO/DGB. A vote seems like an odd thing to misplace.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 12:51 pm
by Majiffy
I've forgotten whom I've had my vote on plenty of times.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:00 pm
by Selkies
How often do you forget that you don't have a vote down?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:02 pm
by Selkies
I'm not trying to make a case out of this. It's one data point in the constellation that represents my current read of Rach.

I would like to know where she's thinking about putting her vote, why, and what she needs to either get there or rule the vote out.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:10 pm
by Majiffy
Not too often, but every once in a while. I'd say maybe like once or twice a month.

I think a big part of it is the number of games I'm in, so if it's a really slow-moving game I forget wtf is going on between posts.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:10 pm
by Majiffy
I agree with your line of questioning re: Rach, though.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:21 pm
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1240, Selkies wrote:Thinking about switching our vote to Jennifer.
In post 1247, Selkies wrote:VOTE: Jennifer
In post 1266, Selkies wrote:Can we wagon varsoon pretty please

-o

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:27 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Selkies what are you doing? we wagon one of them, majiffy is also in the mix. Until we get something we hold our votes. This jumping back and forth makes scum think they can wait it out.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:41 pm
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1228, Svenskt Stål wrote:I would like it if people playing this game would make an effort trying to be towny, i know its alot to ask.

Jennifer/majiffy/vansoor is were i am at
.
In post 1241, Majiffy wrote:
In post 1207, Selkies wrote:
In post 1174, Majiffy wrote: Also if DGB flips scum, Selk is confscum due to interaction with DO wagon earlier.
I still need you to explain this because I've been thinking about it and it doesn't make snese.

We stopped the DO wagon, calling for Rach and Sven to unvote.

If DGB were scum (and in your conjecture, if we were scum), why would we divert wagon off a mislynch, and hammer on our buddy's wagon?
... Because DGB was the DO slot. :facepalm:

Sven's attack on you is really bugging me in pages 48 and 49. Looks like scum trying to force a ML on a known PR. He even uses language on page 49 that alludes to his
knowing
you're town.

Also there's his comment on the NK death which has always been a favorite scumtell of mine.
In post 1240, Selkies wrote:Thinking about switching our vote to Jennifer.
Yeah, that slot needs to post more.

VOTE: Jennifer

Happy with either Varsoon or Sven as well.
Most happy with Sven
. Please respond to the above.
I kinda think its Jennifer/jiffy right now, dont think its majiffy/vansoor alot of the times after majiffy votes jennifer. And el oh el at vote logic.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:46 pm
by Majiffy
In post 1287, Svenskt Stål wrote:I kinda think its Jennifer/jiffy right now, dont think its majiffy/vansoor alot of the times after majiffy votes jennifer. And el oh el at vote logic.
Translated into English?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:55 pm
by Selkies
In post 1286, Svenskt Stål wrote:Selkies what are you doing? we wagon one of them, majiffy is also in the mix. Until we get something we hold our votes. This jumping back and forth makes scum think they can wait it out.
Jennifer is not giving us enough to get a decent read and is hence mostly in null and scum piles right now. DGB thought Jennifer was the scummiest player in the game. She made 13 posts day 1 and several of those were content free as far as questions for or evaluations of other players. She has one conversational interaction, and that was over the advisability of trying to form a town core. She says she can't be forced to participate. Votes are all we have, so I am using our vote to try and encourage some interaction.

Varsoon is still a person of extreme interest in my view. And in orcinus' view. We've got too weeks. We should strive to improve our information on players. The ones I want to hear much more from are Jennifer and AA9. I think we'll hear more from Varsoon naturally. If not, we can dig for it. I'm not going to ask him to expound on his case for our slot being scum. He's doing himself no favors by not expounding.

-f

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:11 pm
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1289, Selkies wrote:
In post 1286, Svenskt Stål wrote:Selkies what are you doing? we wagon one of them, majiffy is also in the mix. Until we get something we hold our votes. This jumping back and forth makes scum think they can wait it out.
Jennifer is not giving us enough to get a decent read and is hence mostly in null and scum piles right now. DGB thought Jennifer was the scummiest player in the game. She made 13 posts day 1 and several of those were content free as far as questions for or evaluations of other players. She has one conversational interaction, and that was over the advisability of trying to form a town core. She says she can't be forced to participate. Votes are all we have, so I am using our vote to try and encourage some interaction.

Varsoon is still a person of extreme interest in my view. And in orcinus' view. We've got too weeks. We should strive to improve our information on players. The ones I want to hear much more from are Jennifer and AA9. I think we'll hear more from Varsoon naturally. If not, we can dig for it. I'm not going to ask him to expound on his case for our slot being scum. He's doing himself no favors by not expounding.

-f
I am not argueing, but DGB also had icebox scum, so I dont think that speaks to the case you are trying to make.

You votes varsoon, then voted jennifer then asked for a varsoon wagon...within 12 hours. I am saying that you need to slow down.

Agree about hearing more from jennifer, but the aa9 slot has posted as much as varsoon, granted aa9s view would be important, but like you said there is some info there to dig up.

We stay on Jennifer until she convinces us that she is town. All this jumping arround and stating that we want to pressure alot of indiviuals are kinda working against us, scum has to know that when a wagon lands on them they have to step it the fuck up, not go awol until we have second guessed ourselfs and shifted to someone else.

VOTE: Jennifer

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:17 pm
by borkjerfkin
Votecount 2.1


[3] Jennifer (Majiffy, Selkies, Svenskt Stål)
[1] Selkies (Varsoon)

[3] Not Voting (ArcAngel9, Jennifer, RachMarie)

With 7 alive, it is 4 to lynch.

Let me know if you see any problems.

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-04-30 10:00:00)

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:27 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Also selkies, do you think it looks good for majiffy to be focusing on me like varsoon is on you?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:44 pm
by Selkies
In post 1292, Svenskt Stål wrote:Also selkies, do you think it looks good for majiffy to be focusing on me like varsoon is on you?
I like a Majiffy with squinty eyes and suspicions better than a Majiffy who looks comfortable with the state of affairs, tbh. I feel that way about most players.

Not too comfortable with leaving Jennifer at L-1 overnight. Is she at L-1?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:45 pm
by Selkies
I guess griping about L-1 is nearly as good as a sig for me. :/

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:46 pm
by Majiffy
Yeah she is. But frankly unless scum wants to claim ITT I don't think we have to worry about quickhammers.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:55 pm
by Svenskt Stål
In post 1293, Selkies wrote:
In post 1292, Svenskt Stål wrote:Also selkies, do you think it looks good for majiffy to be focusing on me like varsoon is on you?
I like a Majiffy with squinty eyes and suspicions better than a Majiffy who looks comfortable with the state of affairs, tbh. I feel that way about most players.

Not too comfortable with leaving Jennifer at L-1 overnight. Is she at L-1?
lol, I am alone in this game.

fine.

Also, you cant be affraid of lynching someone you are wagoning,,,, that kinda takes away the threat off it, food for thought.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:01 pm
by ArcAngel9
Jennifer pretty much said nothing since the game has began, all her posts pretty much indicating how much she is behind catching up and never actually did anything. this is not her meta....

so if you all agreed to not to blame me.. I am willing to hammer Jennifer now or do you all want to give her more time defend herself??

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:03 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Yes, we want her to defend herself,hold hammer.

Who are you trusting this game?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:05 pm
by Svenskt Stål
Aaaaaaaand, shes gone.