Mafiascum.net

I don't regret that vote at all in fact I'm still somewhat happy about it

can someone tell me why DGB is so scummy I've seen it as DGB being like a uni sr but I haven't read anything from then I guess I could take a look at their ISO but a basis to work off of first would be nice.

Ok. I want to look for people pushing kts who weren't drawing attention to themselves and/or off the wagon. I don't think scum would make a big deal over trying to lynch someone only to have them flip PR.

-Manuel gave intent when intent was already given-- slightly towny
-Maria thought she was hammering early/generally drew attention to herself by voting and unvoting-- towny
-JarJar hammered and also voted and unvoted a bunch of times-- towny
-Rask made solid points against kts when he was already going down-- towny
-Slandaar was the first vote on the wagon and pushed it decently hard (though before the PR claim)-- towny
-hiplop voted kts because their predecessor did, and wasn't there for the claim and lynch-- meh
-fire tried to defend kts and called me scummy for bringing up points against them. Wasn't there for the lynch-- meh lean scum
-LQ voted after rask made the case, didn't do much else-- scummy (though I still have him as solidly town after rb interactions)
-DGB hopped on the wagon then disappeared-- scummy
-kraska unvoted and wanted to wait a day or two after the claim-- meh lean scum

(to be fair I would be on the scummy side of this list but still)

VOTE: DGB

DGB is using her goofiness as an excuse to do nothing, slandaar says (and I agree from my limited experience with her) that she usually tries to do stuff as town

Okay give me an hour and i'll come back read DGB's iso and i'll give a read and I have to say sorry I feel like a scumread a lot of people because I was being really picky and just wanting to have reads for the sake of having them and that's not good for anyone besides mafia cause if I can't back up a lot of my reads with well thought out logic it can only lead to helping mafia

VOTE: DGB

will compromise a policy lynch on hiplop if he doesn't start playing.

In post 1279, hiplop wrote:VOTE: manuel

Dat be a naked vote.

In post 1081, DrippingGoofball wrote:Slandaar is still scum

Maybe I can help him bus his buddy though
VOTE: Killthestory

Pretty shitty vote there.

The hiplop is supposed to be a "scummy" not "meh"

Like Infinity said, Slander was pushing the lynch kinda hard. No reason to see that and just automatically think "Bus"

Maria I want a scum/null/town list from you
You don't even have to explain your reads

VOTE: rask

Would also vote dgb
And Maria maybe
But I'm feeling scumrask more

Rask low-key retracting his townread on rb slot bc of fire is pretty shitty especially after fire's townslip

I don't think rask would've pushed so hard for the lynch of a town PR that was already doomed as scum.

In post 1287, kraska77 wrote:fire's townslip

?

In post 1286, kraska77 wrote:Maria I want a scum/null/town list from you
You don't even have to explain your reads

VOTE: rask

Would also vote dgb
And Maria maybe
But I'm feeling scumrask more

Why?

In post 1140, Fire Assassin wrote:I don't see a reason to lynch KTS if what he says is true, Scum have to nk him or he has to out his "results" if he is scum.
Basically not a good lynch target today even if he is annoying.

This post is pretty shitty. Obviously "if what [KTS] says is true" there's be no reason to lynch him. If what he he says is true then he's town.

It feels like FA wrote this post knowing KTS was town.

The fact that he just disappeared and just let the lynch go through doesn't look good either.

Before reading: Town: Fire
Jarjar
Null: Rask
Infinity
Manuel
DGB
Kraska
Scum: LQ
Hiplop
Slandaar

I can expalin my TR's/SR's if you ask me to talk about a null read I prob couldn't

In post 1291, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 1140, Fire Assassin wrote:I don't see a reason to lynch KTS if what he says is true, Scum have to nk him or he has to out his "results" if he is scum.
Basically not a good lynch target today even if he is annoying.

This post is pretty shitty. Obviously "if what [KTS] says is true" there's be no reason to lynch him. If what he he says is true then he's town.

It feels like FA wrote this post knowing KTS was town.

The fact that he just disappeared and just let the lynch go through doesn't look good either.

I am not in the mood for this nonsense.
If you want to push the person who was trying to be the voice of reason, go for it.
But you are being ridiculous as town was yesterday.

In post 1291, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 1140, Fire Assassin wrote:I don't see a reason to lynch KTS if what he says is true, Scum have to nk him or he has to out his "results" if he is scum.
Basically not a good lynch target today even if he is annoying.

This post is pretty shitty. Obviously "if what [KTS] says is true" there's be no reason to lynch him. If what he he says is true then he's town.

It feels like FA wrote this post knowing KTS was town.

The fact that he just disappeared and just let the lynch go through doesn't look good either.

Yeah that's a good point, honestly a lot of people did that

But basically this makes me more confident in my scumreads of fire, hiplop, and DGB

In post 1287, kraska77 wrote:Rask low-key retracting his townread on rb slot bc of fire is pretty shitty especially after fire's townslip

Can you point out the slip? I think you know what my stance is on "slips"?

In post 1295, Infinity 324 wrote:But basically this makes me more confident in my scumreads of fire, hiplop, and DGB

Your scumreads are fake or horseshit.

@lq No I don't
And iso him He only has like a couple of posts in the thread it's not hard to figure out what posts I'm talking about