Page 52 of 236
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:37 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1272, Gamma Emerald wrote:One of my preferred scumhunting methods is watching people interact with confirmed town. Scum will try to discredit them any way they can.
Scum will try to discredit the ic?
probably not
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:38 am
by mhsmith0
In post 1272, Gamma Emerald wrote:One of my preferred scumhunting methods is watching people interact with confirmed town. Scum will try to discredit them any way they can.
Oh good, did someone already do that? Or are you just needlessly telling the wolves what not to do? If you're trying to play the "bad town" card, please stop.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:40 am
by Human Sequencer
Parma is right by the way, Shadow literally just lied about his perspective at an earlier point in the game.
We can't not lynch shadow today. No way.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:42 am
by inspectorscout
In post 1265, mhsmith0 wrote:You're making a list of things she could have said but are failing to explain why any of them would actually be helpful to you.
Let's start with the first one: that she thinks pie is a wolf (it's a reasonably obvious possible answer). Having her out that read at a time when pie isn't under pressure isn't necessarily helpful to anyone, since if pie is suspicious it's more helpful to have other people be bringing up points there, and then if pie flips wolf you can better evaluate who pressured her and why. Like, walk through that scenario, where the actual answer is that nahdia suspects pie, and come up with a town-positive reason for her to out that suspicion, because I don't see any.
Instead, it looks like you're either fake scum-hunting the IC or maybe just asking the IC to tell you what to think. Which is, at best, lazy town.
So because I'm not the IC I'm supposed to shit out reads but the IC shouldn't. Bullshit, the IC is our most valuable player and should voice her thoughts. She asked you about a specific player and I wanted to know why that player in particular. Not because I find Nahdia questionable, but it seemed to be an odd player to ask about.
Either of those answers gives me a clearer view of her reads and on the way she thinks. It's the way I play and the way I think. Unless I think you're scum I consider your reads and want to know why they are that way. It's called a town, not a single player.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:44 am
by inspectorscout
In post 1274, mhsmith0 wrote:
Perhaps. I probably need to ISO him and see where that goes, but at the very least that was a ping and something he did a pretty poor job defending on.
"I need to iso him"
= I'm going to try and find wood to fuel bias. Go ahead, I'm interested in seeing you do stuff.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:45 am
by MiniDeathStar
In post 1277, Human Sequencer wrote:Parma is right by the way, Shadow literally just lied about his perspective at an earlier point in the game.
We can't not lynch shadow today. No way.
I agree with this btw. I'm just waiting on Jester to see if he can convince me otherwise.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:46 am
by Human Sequencer
He literally just told me he's unsure. How is that biased?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:46 am
by mhsmith0
In post 1278, inspectorscout wrote:So because I'm not the IC I'm supposed to shit out reads but the IC shouldn't. Bullshit, the IC is our most valuable player and should voice her thoughts. She asked you about a specific player and I wanted to know why that player in particular. Not because I find Nahdia questionable, but it seemed to be an odd player to ask about.
Either of those answers gives me a clearer view of her reads and on the way she thinks. It's the way I play and the way I think. Unless I think you're scum I consider your reads and want to know why they are that way. It's called a town, not a single player.
The IC being open and clear about reads, especially super early in the game, is less of a priority than everyone else being open and clear about reads (especially since the IC can't possibly be NK'd before a number of lynches happen first). It's a strange priority for a town player to have at this juncture.
PS If SAD is a wolf, then MDS is pretty likely a wolf too for the IS WK.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:47 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1255, Dunnstral wrote: In post 1226, mhsmith0 wrote: In post 1074, Shadow_step wrote:Seeing how the last game went, I think it's better to push a lynch on your own partner instead of suiciding if you think they are scum.
Town have more info if there is a lynch.
Fwiw this almost exactly mirrored what I'd said to pie in our PT earlier. Minor possible partner points there, thought I'd like to think they wouldn't make that easy of an error.
Also exactly mirrors what I said earlier:
In post 975, Dunnstral wrote:Can you stop giving up by the way
If you think he's town don't leave the dance. Make other people vote for him.
In post 979, Dunnstral wrote:
You shouldn't suicide a null read.
Make other people vote for him. Even if he's scum we get information
In post 983, Dunnstral wrote:There shouldn't be any case where you do that
I'm saying town gets more information and scum have to potentially reach to try to lynch him.
If he's scum, we still get more information from a lynch
You don't know what a last resort is. You just want to die a hero. But you're not.
What did you think of this?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:48 am
by Dunnstral
Shadow is just mirroring what I said to Maria? (about him, no less)
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:49 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1282, mhsmith0 wrote:PS If SAD is a wolf, then MDS is pretty likely a wolf too for the IS WK.
And which would you lynch first?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:49 am
by mhsmith0
In post 1272, Gamma Emerald wrote:One of my preferred scumhunting methods is watching people interact with confirmed town. Scum will try to discredit them any way they can.
@Dunn: I'd missed you making the point the first time. Lessens the possible connection between shadow and pie, but makes shadow's point on that subject even sheepier than I'd thought.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:50 am
by mhsmith0
Not sure. Just kinda reacting at this juncture, since there's a bunch of stuff I haven't really read yet.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:52 am
by Human Sequencer
@mh, I am unfamiliar with the term 'WK', could you please educate me?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:52 am
by inspectorscout
In post 1282, mhsmith0 wrote: In post 1278, inspectorscout wrote:So because I'm not the IC I'm supposed to shit out reads but the IC shouldn't. Bullshit, the IC is our most valuable player and should voice her thoughts. She asked you about a specific player and I wanted to know why that player in particular. Not because I find Nahdia questionable, but it seemed to be an odd player to ask about.
Either of those answers gives me a clearer view of her reads and on the way she thinks. It's the way I play and the way I think. Unless I think you're scum I consider your reads and want to know why they are that way. It's called a town, not a single player.
The IC being open and clear about reads, especially super early in the game, is less of a priority than everyone else being open and clear about reads (especially since the IC can't possibly be NK'd before a number of lynches happen first). It's a strange priority for a town player to have at this juncture.
PS If SAD is a wolf, then MDS is pretty likely a wolf too for the IS WK.
But I'm not asking her to be open with her reads? I indirectly asked if that was an attempt at scumhunting on you, genuine interest in your read for some reason or lack of own reads? I didn't have a good read on you, and neither on pie.
Why, if you think I'm scum, are you even talking about SAD? Do you think we are both scum? You saying this shows that you are either townreading me or throwing shade.
As you would put it:
You're attempting to find associative tells before any informational flip has occured. It's a strange priority for a town player to have at this juncture.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:53 am
by inspectorscout
...
Just wait and see, young padawan.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:53 am
by mhsmith0
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:53 am
by Human Sequencer
Ah ok. Thanks.
Scout calm down, he literally never even called you scum lmao
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:54 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1253, Human Sequencer wrote:I don't trust you as much~
Besides that your reads are probably trash~
Just like last game~
By all means, go ahead.
Did you explain why you don't trust me or why you're discrediting my reads?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:55 am
by Dunnstral
Also you're openly sheeping my read so
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:55 am
by inspectorscout
I know
But he is trying to discredit my play. He called me 'lazy town at best' while I definitely had a reason for asking
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:55 am
by mhsmith0
In post 1289, inspectorscout wrote: In post 1282, mhsmith0 wrote: In post 1278, inspectorscout wrote:So because I'm not the IC I'm supposed to shit out reads but the IC shouldn't. Bullshit, the IC is our most valuable player and should voice her thoughts. She asked you about a specific player and I wanted to know why that player in particular. Not because I find Nahdia questionable, but it seemed to be an odd player to ask about.
Either of those answers gives me a clearer view of her reads and on the way she thinks. It's the way I play and the way I think. Unless I think you're scum I consider your reads and want to know why they are that way. It's called a town, not a single player.
The IC being open and clear about reads, especially super early in the game, is less of a priority than everyone else being open and clear about reads (especially since the IC can't possibly be NK'd before a number of lynches happen first). It's a strange priority for a town player to have at this juncture.
PS If SAD is a wolf, then MDS is pretty likely a wolf too for the IS WK.
But I'm not asking her to be open with her reads? I indirectly asked if that was an attempt at scumhunting on you, genuine interest in your read for some reason or lack of own reads? I didn't have a good read on you, and neither on pie.
Why, if you think I'm scum, are you even talking about SAD? Do you think we are both scum? You saying this shows that you are either townreading me or throwing shade.
As you would put it:
You're attempting to find associative tells before any informational flip has occured. It's a strange priority for a town player to have at this juncture.
Identifying connections between players is sometimes interesting, including to see how people react to it. You seem to think that this is unreasonable. Is it because
1) You think that the idea of a SAD-MDS team makes no sense?
or
2) Because "it's just too early" to look at how people might be connected together?
or
3) Something else?
Because the MDS WK of you at that spot was itself pretty interesting and IMO worth commenting on. Do you disagree?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:57 am
by MiniDeathStar
Oh I just figured out WK means whiteknighting. Lmao I'm slow.
MhSmith, you gave me your walls of text explaining why townies make careless mistakes a lot more than wolves, and why digging into those instead of analysing votes, stances and reads is something a wolf would attempt. So I thought you were bullshitting us. My scumread on you has nothing to do with my read on inspector or Arthur.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:57 am
by mhsmith0
In post 1295, inspectorscout wrote:I know
But he is trying to discredit my play. He called me 'lazy town at best' while I definitely had a reason for asking
Except that it was a terrible reason, which shows that you're not prioritizing your sorting in what I would consider a reasonable manner. Which means IMO you're being intellectually lazy with that question, which is either wolf or lazy town. Not sure which yet, but yes it was bad on your end.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:58 am
by Human Sequencer
@Dunn
I don't trust you as much because my Pie townread is stronger than my Dunn townread, and I was being coy that entire post.
Like I said, feel free to go right ahead and convince me on Jester/mini.