Lady Angel (6): Nero Cain, Innocent Children, jjh927, Invisibility, Gamma Emerald, Titus
Porkens (2): randomidget, Nosferatu
Innocent Children (2): KuroiXHF, Sora
Mastina (2): Maid Cafe, Nicorobin
Vecna (1): Lady Angel
Titus (1): Porkens
Nosferatu (1): Skygazer
KuroiXHF (0):
Ginngie (0):
Nero Cain (0):
Vaxkiller (0):
Skygazer (0):
Whemestar (0):
Chickadee (0):
Invisibility (0):
Nicorobin (0):
jjh927 (0):
Rylai and Lina (0):
Maid Cafe (0):
Gamma Emerald (0):
randomidget (0):
Not Voting: Vecna, Vaxkiller,
Wh4t
, Chickadee, Mastina, Ginngie, Shiro, Whemestar
With 21 alive it's 12 to lynch. (this is correct.)
The day will end in (expired on 2018-09-25 18:00:00).
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:44 pm
by Rylai and Lina
Reading titus iso, I stand by what I said about them earlier. I think this is toward their town meta but still this is underwhelming and I can't make a strong read on the slot.
Like when she is scum she does calculate derps and tried to string shit up - for example, look at heroes wanted day 1. she is in my town pool for the moment depending on how she develops her game after this and I want more titus in game.
In post 1216, Lady Angel wrote:What's the difference between me and all the other low posters/lurkers in this game? I don't see anything seperating the case on me from being on any other of them, other than people picking me for some reason.
why me = fry me
It really pains me to be close to being on the same page as the 1 person, who won’t have a civil conversation wth me. Fuck me.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:57 pm
by Rylai and Lina
So many people shown concern over chick early posts that it kinds of pings me. I feel like there is some meta related reason that I didn't digg yet
also are you trying to convince you should not be seen as town for the way you claimed to others? like how is that the most important thing for you right now?
~Sora
In post 110, Rylai and Lina wrote:Ok I actually think what mastina claimed might be legit. I need to write down scenarios of the way it can interact with my role and talk about this to shiro more.
~Sora
In post 615, Rylai and Lina wrote:JJH flip flop on mastina gives the vibe that he was not prepared for the claim so its likely that they are not w-w but I'm not confident to even bet on that. I still have them both at null pile here.
Also this is the proper time to use this gif not last time
As I also said that night, I don't like how mastina was fighting against people who were saying her role is towny by pushing the "Role != alignment" narrative at all. it feels forced and over the top.
In post 131, jjh927 wrote:If Mastina is loyal and scum, she would only be able to target other scum. Therefore the role would be set up to 1 for 1 trade with town only if she wins the debate that is a gladiate. In this circumstance, it is strictly worse than a normal gladiate. If she were to target scum, her best case scenario is a no lynch, assuming that is possible, which confirms neither her nor her target as town but allows for her to play as though she has absolute proof that the other player is town--- which falls apart instantly if either of them die as the other becomes confscum.
Thus, if it is indeed as described, it would be completely useless to scum.
It is possible that this is just one ability as part of a JoaT, and with my lack of resources to determine the power-density of this game it is impossible to say more. Working with what there is, however, and believing the claim as it is (as this is the simplest option), makes it town by virtue of it A. the total lack of use to scum, B. the potential use to town at the detriment of the self, and C. the fact that people who aren't me do not consider the role to be strongly indicative of town, making it an unlikely choice for a curveball "you thought it was town but it was
me, dio
scum" role, which I think also contributes to the probability that this is not a JoaT role.
So here is the thing I feared that night. we have a modifier that will help us strongly if someone gladiates us. What if she is lieing about being loyal thing or is saying that cause she is scum and she has a modifier like that. also why should I have the modifier if the gladiator is town.
In post 239, Titus wrote:Occam's Razor. If a role provides no utility for town in any theory, then it's scum. If there's no scum utility, it's probably town. Those suppose honesty. Yet marina's claim makes zero sense for town as claimed. It does not help scum either. Given mods do not design roles that lack utility, we're looking at mastina lying about some part of her claim or something novel that mastina role counters.
This is a strange line of thinking to evaluate roles but it's a titusy way of doing that so it warms my heart a little bit about titus.
Mastina role is most definitly incomplete and I think that the last part is the part that shows what alignment it is not what was claimed. but yeah I still see no reason for scum her to claim like this unless if she wants to use the gladiate.
I won't be able to post again for several hours when I get off work. If I come back to more than like 5 pages, just know I'm not reading a word of it. My scum buddies will catch me up.
In post 371, jjh927 wrote:Not convinced it's actually towny looking content
what content is "not towny" looking? Let's ignore the fake dayvig, like if ppl want to town read me for that fine and if you don't then that's ok. I mean, I could argue "why in the world do you think a fake daykill is AI." but the fake daykill isn't the sum total of my content. So talk to me about it.
Scare quotes, but I kind of want to vote jjh927 for grandstanding.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
I remember you being pretty decent, but maybe things have changed.
In post 454, Chickadee wrote:Vax, I'm thunking you rolled scum here.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
also are you trying to convince you should not be seen as town for the way you claimed to others? like how is that the most important thing for you right now?
~Sora
In post 110, Rylai and Lina wrote:Ok I actually think what mastina claimed might be legit. I need to write down scenarios of the way it can interact with my role and talk about this to shiro more.
~Sora
In post 615, Rylai and Lina wrote:JJH flip flop on mastina gives the vibe that he was not prepared for the claim so its likely that they are not w-w but I'm not confident to even bet on that. I still have them both at null pile here.
Also this is the proper time to use this gif not last time
As I also said that night, I don't like how mastina was fighting against people who were saying her role is towny by pushing the "Role != alignment" narrative at all. it feels forced and over the top.
In post 131, jjh927 wrote:If Mastina is loyal and scum, she would only be able to target other scum. Therefore the role would be set up to 1 for 1 trade with town only if she wins the debate that is a gladiate. In this circumstance, it is strictly worse than a normal gladiate. If she were to target scum, her best case scenario is a no lynch, assuming that is possible, which confirms neither her nor her target as town but allows for her to play as though she has absolute proof that the other player is town--- which falls apart instantly if either of them die as the other becomes confscum.
Thus, if it is indeed as described, it would be completely useless to scum.
It is possible that this is just one ability as part of a JoaT, and with my lack of resources to determine the power-density of this game it is impossible to say more. Working with what there is, however, and believing the claim as it is (as this is the simplest option), makes it town by virtue of it A. the total lack of use to scum, B. the potential use to town at the detriment of the self, and C. the fact that people who aren't me do not consider the role to be strongly indicative of town, making it an unlikely choice for a curveball "you thought it was town but it was
me, dio
scum" role, which I think also contributes to the probability that this is not a JoaT role.
So here is the thing I feared that night. we have a modifier that will help us strongly if someone gladiates us. What if she is lieing about being loyal thing or is saying that cause she is scum and she has a modifier like that. also why should I have the modifier if the gladiator is town.
In post 239, Titus wrote:Occam's Razor. If a role provides no utility for town in any theory, then it's scum. If there's no scum utility, it's probably town. Those suppose honesty. Yet marina's claim makes zero sense for town as claimed. It does not help scum either. Given mods do not design roles that lack utility, we're looking at mastina lying about some part of her claim or something novel that mastina role counters.
This is a strange line of thinking to evaluate roles but it's a titusy way of doing that so it warms my heart a little bit about titus.
Mastina role is most definitly incomplete and I think that the last part is the part that shows what alignment it is not what was claimed. but yeah I still see no reason for scum her to claim like this unless if she wants to use the gladiate.
~Rylai
~Sora
Thanks. I do agree with pretty much everything you’ve said in your recent posts - me excluded obviously. I think LA is not a bad lynch, not convinced it’s the best one though. Nico does have a valid point about Mastina being a much bigger threat then LA (IF scum, that is). But I’m tl her atm. I think some of her reads are off like Nico. I think Dis may have been on to something with his eary K scumread. I didn’t think much about it initially but it gets noticeably bad on reread.
Anyway, Titus is incorrect about the town utility thing. There are negative town roles, like town false alarm in Labrynth. Not only did that role have no town utility it was actually harmful to town and based on that, no ne should base alignment strictly off of that - particularly in an RC game.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 9:27 pm
by Innocent Children
I just ISO’d LA in Lynch the Wolves and her posts were much better there. She was scum in that game, so maybe she was coached in that game?
Her ISO in this game and LtWs are strikingly different. I’m starting to think she could be a mislynch here.
I still hate her Vecna vote though.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 9:31 pm
by Innocent Children
In post 1272, Rylai and Lina wrote:So Isoing lady angel and noticing she has only 62 posts on her account she seems way more informed about how mafia works than a newbie but she is so lost in-game and her comments lack the scummy agenda. even that post about vecna since no sane scum would think they can get a vecna lynched like that and would stop her
but then scums do what scums do and she is so eh opportunistic with lack of the spark of solving the game which means she might be scum.
I would still call her a coin flip (as I think its 50-50 to flip scum based on what I can see).
I hope we get some clarification about their proficiency in this game.
~Sora
Hmmm . . .
Can you ISO her in Lynch the Wolves and tell me if that influences your opinion on her, in any way?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 9:39 pm
by Innocent Children
@Sora , what are your thoughts on Skygazer? I really don’t understand the srs since Chick hasn’t contradicted anything they’ve said and I don’t think they’re likely w/w but that whole mulple identical video thing is really weird. Could the number of videos be significant? And the title of the video is about breaking hearts.I dunno but I think the specific number of videos Skygazer receives from Chick could possibly have some significance. I’m pretty sure the one video, she sent me did.
Yes, it was an animated cartoon video.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:33 pm
by Nero Cain
is anyone here?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:59 pm
by Nero Cain
In post 1236, Lady Angel wrote:and I don't have anything better to put a vote on right now.
Do you have any plans to play and catchup?
In post 1253, Innocent Children wrote:Vecna definitely seems like an easy mislynch. Is LA a newb player because if not, her pushing this slot for what? This type of thing is hardly unprecedented in RC games. If I see player who posts like AA9 did in Labrynth here, that’s entirely different.
While I did color him green since at the time I felt like LA scum=Vecna town , I want to make it clear that I have no reason to town read his play. If he's faking his PR then he's deffo scum and that's a possibility. If RC gave him a PR then he's
probably
town.
PRs don't seem as common as they used to be when I first started playing but they were almost exclusively given to town wich is kinda unfair gameplay. At some point mods need to give scum a PR to avoid "trust meta". /end mini rant
I do however agree that LA not doing anything and laying down a somewhat sketchy vote on a guy that can't really defend himself was not all that great.
In post 1257, Maid Cafe wrote:I just noiced we didn't V/LA we should be back in 1 or 2 days
but you might be dead in a day or 2. :/
In post 1263, Innocent Children wrote:What’s interesting to me, is that Chick completely backed up what she said about the videos. I honestly don’t know what to make of that.
Yeah, its wonky but I don't really know what to make of it. Like I'm not really sure why a scumGazer (c whut I did there?) goes "oh I got 5 pms!" or what a scumChick has to gain by sending her 5 videos. And if they were scum together wouldn't she be more like "yes" instead of "yeah, whatever."
Just a thing I find strange about Chick is that she says she likes mafia b/c she likes to figure out these games but she seems so apathetic all the time. Maybe it's just a playstyle gimmick?
In post 1266, Rylai and Lina wrote:@Chickaede why did you send multi videoes to someone who claimed ascetic. Is there a reason you must spread gifts?
just to be clear she sent videos BEFORE Sky claimed flavor ascetic.
Do you not like the rhyme or who it's being used on? Its almost certainly as old as my mafia playing day so it was very likely around pre-Nero.
In post 1284, Innocent Children wrote:Her ISO in this game and LtWs are strikingly different. I’m starting to think she could be a mislynch here.
I begrudgingly agree with this.
In post 1286, Innocent Children wrote:Could the number of videos be significant? And the title of the video is about breaking hearts.I dunno but I think the specific number of videos Skygazer receives from Chick could possibly have some significance. I’m pretty sure the one video, she sent me did.
She's clearly some type of
fruit
music vendor and the title is AtE designed to get Sky to stop scum reading her. This is not hard.
Reading the last few pages made me immediately aware of where we are at and what's going on. I can clearly see that Nancy is posting way too much. She says that she may be pulling back on that, so everyone, count your blessings, I guess. Instead you will have me to deal with for a majority of time. Hopefully this isn't an improvement at all.
~Disquieted
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:20 am
by Innocent Children
Reading through Lynch the Wolves for a comparison of Lady Angel's meta comes off as difficult. The game she was in... she was... mafia, so she assumed she was anti-town. Except she wasn't. How confusing. Regardless that really means she was attempting to play as the mafia alignment in that game.
Few things that are pinging me here on this ISO that may or may not have been covered already. And yes, it's only 9 posts but I have words about it.
In post 1218, Nero Cain wrote:how come you aren't playing? Why didn't you comment on being wagoned earlier?
I had a lot of non-mafia related commitments to take care of this week, this was the first chance I've gotten since maybe late friday to really read. I usually skip or low-post through day 1, since analyzing posts is very much not my strong point when nobody's flipped yet.
Speaking of, I don't have a really strong feeling on anyone so far, except Vecna, whose whole great cornholio thing is just annoying. So I don't really have anything to add right now.
I feel as if the first part has too much of a guilty conscience. It's strange because she manages to not use this as an excuse in Lynch the Wolves and she was mafia ("mafia") there, but ignoring that meta I would be suspicious of this phrasing. When I say "guilty conscience" it means that she's feeling like her lack of content is something that she should be worrying about. This make sense?
The second part of this post is strange about not having strong feelings, because several events have happened over the course of this game that Lady Angel has actually... acknowledged.
In post 329, Lady Angel wrote:Did we actually have a dayvig less than a day into D1?
In post 500, Lady Angel wrote:How are people getting items on day 1 in a game with daystart? That's the weird part to me about Chickadee's role.
In addition, she's clearly read up enough of the thread to know that she's not the easiest lynch in the world.
In post 1216, Lady Angel wrote:What's the difference between me and all the other low posters/lurkers in this game? I don't see anything seperating the case on me from being on any other of them, other than people picking me for some reason.
You seem to have a reticence for giving your reads, Lady Angel. Perhaps you don't think they matter or they're useless so early in Day 1. They do, even if they're not perfect or well formed. I would like to hear what they are. And you should have some... thoughts, even if you don't feel like you have understood the thread or read closely. Being wrong is OK.
I just want to give them real reasons for headaches and bashing their head to a wall for a change.
~Sora
You’re officially being rude in the same way I feel RC was being rude to you in the Kingdom Hearts game and I want you to maybe be a little more respectful of Nancy’s feelings.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:29 am
by Innocent Children
I was told that Kuroi voted for us and that made me interested. All in all it's an OK post to vote us. I'm not unhappy with it at all. I was expecting something with pure OMGUS, but the post is OK on tone.
Alright, I don't really have much else to say in particular that I want to talk about as opposed to discussing with Nancy. I'm going to update our notes and head off. It's likely you're going to see more of this head in the near future, but I'll attempt to keep a low profile in comparison with my partner so that uh, only half of this slot can be considered a bit spammy, I guess.
Epicmafia geeks who can’t form a real argument
I think it actually works sometimes but against newbs it has a rather sizable failure rate
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:32 am
by Innocent Children
I didn't want to mention it but since Gamma brought it up.... As someone who is not Nancy, seeing Rylai bring up our slot as a scumread because they assume something blatantly wrong of Nancy's playstyle aggravates me to no end... let alone what Nancy thinks.
Epicmafia geeks who can’t form a real argument
I think it actually works sometimes but against newbs it has a rather sizable failure rate
Eh. I don't think experienced players are likely to say "why me" either. I also think your assumed failure rate of this read might be smaller than you think. You can probably get a decent amount of newbies with a wrong tell here but a large majority of newbies say "why me" in a scummy way.
