Mafiascum.net

wicked might be scum

that's what i keep sayin

skitt you're late to the party

we already have decided to save skitt/tw/bingle for later and have funsies lynching Egix + Blatant + Wicked possibly meme scum team

ty ty

ok but i want him to bus you first tho

In post 768, skitter30 wrote:

In post 753, the worst wrote:don't really see scum motive from bingle either rn

Really ???

In post 769, the worst wrote:nah

skitter v1 you were literally this person
how do you nakedvote me at the time then pivot to finding it sketchy days later when wicked brings it up?

skitter30 wrote:

In post 1130, Wickedestjr wrote:*Correct me if I’m wrong, but it looks like he does a rapid flip on his Bingle read from saying he doesn’t agree with a Bingle scumread to saying Bingle is outright scummy a page later. The worst, can you explain that?

it *does* look like he does a rapid flip on his bingle read!

In post 1278, skitter30 wrote:ok but i want him to bus you first tho

thought i was an sk last time
sadly he can't bus me as we are transparently unaligned

In post 1277, Nibbui wrote:skitt you're late to the party

we already have decided to save skitt/tw/bingle for later and have funsies lynching Egix + Blatant + Wicked possibly meme scum team

ty ty

i want to lynch in tw/bingle today

blatant is prob town
i have no idea how to read egix
wicked is prob scum and i guess we can vote there too but i want tw/bingle because i fear you lot will never resolve them

In post 1279, the worst wrote:how do you nakedvote me at the time then pivot to finding it sketchy days later when wicked brings it up?

i dont' understand the question, you changed your read on him shortly thereafter after i kept badgering you on it

lynching in {me, bingle} when you have an X/SK read on us is literally +scum ev
even if you're not lynching to hit sk we're harder slots to sort - and we will be resolved later

you're letting blatantly scummier slots skate by. why?

Egix is definitely highest scum slot odds here and i'm not joking anymore.

If you want to lynch in tw/bingle better to start doing better because today i'm lynching Egix.

In post 1280, the worst wrote:

In post 1278, skitter30 wrote:ok but i want him to bus you first tho

thought i was an sk last time
sadly he can't bus me as we are transparently unaligned

i think you're trying to make it look like that, yes

^^^^^^^

.....lol

nibbui congrats on the promotion
skitter is scum

In post 1283, the worst wrote:lynching in {me, bingle} when you have an X/SK read on us is literally +scum ev
even if you're not lynching to hit sk we're harder slots to sort - and we will be resolved later

you're letting blatantly scummier slots skate by. why?

i think one of you is scum and the other is sk
not sure why lynching in you guys is a bad idea
you're both fully capable of endgaming, i am not at all confident that you'll be resolved later

i disagree that there are baltantly scummier slots

WE'RE NOT GONNA LET THOSE 13 EGIX'S POSTS WITH 13 DIFFERENT SCUM TELLS FLY BY

In post 1287, the worst wrote:.....lol

nibbui congrats on the promotion
skitter is scum

this isn't a real read you have, but ok

egix is literally scum.
wicked is v likely scum.

if you think i'm distancing from bingle then not distancing from bingle bc one of us is a sk then i'm distancing from wicked without supporting the read i think you're fabricating reads to make me look suspicious regardless of the situation: this is pushing a lynch, not a read.
sorting for SK day one when there are clearly-scum slots is scumsiding - simple fact.
pushing slots which are more ~dubious~ because you're worried we'll be alive for longer over slots which are explicitly scum is either defending a buddy or positioning mislynches for later in the game

you aren't pushing anything that involves lynching mafia d1 - why?

In post 1287, the worst wrote:skitter is scum

If this is true, I demand a whole loaf of bread in the postgame.

if you think {bingle, tw} is sk/mafia accept that these factions necessarily have to remove each other - SKs are good at finding groupscum and groupscum are (usually) ok at finding SKs. max town ev play is to let them gun each other down.

yet you feel that you have to steer the lynch into this false dichotomy and choose to apply your weight to swinging the gamestate away from lynching obvscum slots. given how much pressure bungle/i are already under it makes no sense to lynch us today; you should be aware that at a meta level i also become a lot more obvious after d1. i literally can't see town motive in the way you're swinging this and the way you're casing your ""reads"" looks like you're gunning for lynches rather than dynamically having and reevaluating reads

In post 1292, Bingle wrote:

In post 1287, the worst wrote:skitter is scum

If this is true, I demand a whole loaf of bread in the postgame.

fine.

In post 1181, Nibbui wrote:Egix, BS o Wicked.

rn I think the chances of there being scum in them is high enough but it's a waste of d1 to lynch that kind of slot if we get it wrong.

If one of them is scum i don't think they would actually win in a lylo either.

i agree with this ^

In post 1291, the worst wrote:egix is literally scum.
wicked is v likely scum.

if you think i'm distancing from bingle then not distancing from bingle bc one of us is a sk then i'm distancing from wicked without supporting the read i think you're fabricating reads to make me look suspicious regardless of the situation: this is pushing a lynch, not a read.
sorting for SK day one when there are clearly-scum slots is scumsiding - simple fact.
pushing slots which are more ~dubious~ because you're worried we'll be alive for longer over slots which are explicitly scum is either defending a buddy or positioning mislynches for later in the game

you aren't pushing anything that involves lynching mafia d1 - why?

you're right, i'm pushing for a lynch on either of you because i veeery strongly don't believe that you're town

i'm not explicitly sorting for sk so much as i have two players that i don't believe are town and are probably not aligned. that still means one of you is mafia

this isn't a game that i'm going to be alive long in, i'm p sure, and i want to make sure that things are set up as well as i possibly can for afterwards

(also i don't do half-assed defenses of partners, scum!me never tries to mislynch either of you, so try again)

ok your take has been debunked as invalid and scum motivated so you're warlocking an old stance of nibbui's

sorry am i meant to be townreading you?

In post 1296, skitter30 wrote:you're right, i'm pushing for a lynch on either of you because i veeery strongly don't believe that you're town

again you're not actively trying to sort us and ignoring other slots that are scummier than us.

In post 1296, skitter30 wrote:i'm not explicitly sorting for sk so much as i have two players that i don't believe are town and are probably not aligned. that still means one of you is mafia

if the dichotomy is valid allow that we have to remove each other from the game. lynch scummy slots as per usual, what you're trying to do doesn't improve town ev.
the dichotomy isn't valid btw i'm sickeningly aware that i'm town

In post 1296, skitter30 wrote:this isn't a game that i'm going to be alive long in, i'm p sure, and i want to make sure that things are set up as well as i possibly can for afterwards

by deathtunnelling slots and not evaluating reads?
if you're town + there's any level of deepwolf you'll be here til pretty close to lylo

In post 1296, skitter30 wrote:(also i don't do half-assed defenses of partners, scum!me never tries to mislynch either of you, so try again)

i'm not really putting any stock in "scum me wouldn't ____" from you given that outplaying your scum meta is literally your defining scum trait.
am i meant to be townreading you here?

In post 1196, Bingle wrote:4. I got the sense skitter was townreading me during our interactions, but she wasn't trying to convince me I was wrong on a Nibs push, even when I didn't show any reasoning for it. Instead, 401 gave me very scummy vibes of not caring about Nib's actual alignment.

um no