In post 1217, insomnia wrote:I think profii is becoming the new creature in terms of “Well, I have no scum reads, so let’s just flash wagon profii”
I do have a bias towards that tbh, I am sad for him
Clearly you aren’t reading cause that’s not what’s happening at all
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:39 am
by Wimpy
Or you’re scum with him
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:42 am
by Wimpy
In post 1266, Ame wrote:Insomnia I think I'm pretty obvtown, and I don't get how you don't see it. It's frustrating that I think you're town. But maybe you aren't? Eh. You missed the most important point on why he's scum btw.
@Mac can we get a read list from you? Also join me on Obvscum!
VOTE: ObviousScum
@Looker @Wimpy @profii @Egix
If you agree with 1230 (especially point 4) let's do this.
I'm off and going to be busy today.
You accused me of being scum with him and you now appeal to me? If i cursed I’d say FU
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:17 am
by Ame
Yes, I'd like you to join me. My speculation over who his mate is shouldn't affect the fact that he's independently scummy. Associative reads always have some uncertainty. After some sleep, I am back to the third being
one
of you/insomnia. But yes it did catch my eye that you were willing to abandon your read on him when the opportunity presented itself, when you were down for speed lynch earlier. What do you think about his proposal to neap one of his town reads?
@Somni address point 4 please. Looker was viable before hood because I considered it possible 2 of looker, egix, OS were scum as they had a weird trifecta (mainly I thought Looker was crumbing Mason with JTB, which want possible since JTB is scum). That possibility dissolved with the hood reveal.
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:20 am
by insomnia
I don’t know the whole fuzz about the neap checking top town etc, you’d have to spell it out for me
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:22 am
by Wimpy
If that wagon re forms I’ll hammer but I think Luca made excellent points. Insomnia down playing it really stands out.
In post 1174, Wimpy wrote:Question. How has this site not developed an auto vote counter?
They were going to include one with a full site overhaul but there haven't been any visible indications anything has been done irt the overhaul for like a year and a half or something
If this site allows html they can probably copy the code from my home site. Our script automates role dispersal, lynches, hammer deaths/night locks. And other stuff.
All host has to do it night actions(and day), set dls(which auto go to night when it ends), actually make it go to day and uh well use the commands to broadcast the votecount dl etc(but players can also see them in secret at any time).
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 3:41 am
by EeveeLution Army
Though i think the script has a couple coding languages so im not that sure. Im not exactly a coder. But the site is open-source
In post 1137, ObviousScum wrote:also adding the ELA question after the VC is just... idk weird. idk scummy but sometimes scum do 'just weird' stuff from cognitive load
Based on what little prior experience I have with Looker (Big Four) I think it's just something they do naturally.
Spoiler: OT
In post 1137, ObviousScum wrote:why do people keep linking posts that are not the post in the number lol
Maybe it's because people aren't realising that you can just do (post)###(/post) and the forum will automatically reformat it when you preview. No need to put the post ID in the opening tag.
In post 1139, ObviousScum wrote:I still think Aaron spews Mac town and given my lack of desire to reread Mac I am very tempted to just leave my read of him there tbh
Agreed.
In post 1146, Ame wrote:Thinking about it, I'm down for this. It she's scum, she can only be scum with somni and he's doing a double bus.
If she flips scum, I can be vigged and town can lynch somni tomorrow.
If she flips town, we can vig somni and lynch Obvs tomorrow.
In post 1179, insomnia wrote:but I’m not really gonna fight against his lynch tbh
... I say you probably should though.
In post 1181, ObviousScum wrote:I actually think with vig still alive I should say I'm going to neap one out of wimpy or insomnia and ask the vig not to shoot either one
assuming there's the risk scum aims for vig and not me
doesn't make sense to gate the vig more than that I don't think
If you agree with 1230 (especially point 4) let's do this.
Nah. Looker goes first imo.
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:51 am
by Egix96
In post 1084, Egix96 wrote:In post 241, insomnia wrote:
I think Ame is town fwiw.
@insomnia - Do you recall why you thought this?
from my spoiler post yesterday, in case you missed it.
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:52 am
by insomnia
Not really, it was probably some shallow read, like “I like what they’re posting”
As in being aesthetically pleasing
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 6:56 am
by Egix96
Okay that's fine
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:30 am
by ObviousScum
In post 1279, insomnia wrote:I don’t know the whole fuzz about the neap checking top town etc, you’d have to spell it out for me
He put 0 thought into the challenge of choosing a neap shot with an unclaimed vig in the game. Since he is operating from the a prior i assumption I am scum, he assumes anything I propose would have a scum agenda, when this doesn't even really make sense. Or I guess he assumes I would play as an open wolf basically.
Imagine you are a neap in a setup with a mod-confirmed town aligned sane cop. In this scenario, you don't want to check your very top town (since you're sure they're town). But it makes no sense to go for your suspects because you don't get guikties. You want the cip to get guilties and, in this specific gamestate, the job of the neap actually is to get innos. Actually thinking that through is one reason I'm reconsidering my all town hood argument. It is contingent on vig being alive day 2 but maybe designers assumed vig would be alive day 2.
The vig basically is a cop that also happens to flip his target.
Now the problem for me is that while it's tempting to add people I personally townread into my neap pool (i.e. Mac) this prohibits the vig from making a choice to check there and 'full cop it'
What I don't like about Ame's play is that he doesn't actually suggest someone else I should be checking. If he was he'd say 'oh you should be checking mac, your more controversial townread' or something like that. But at the same time he's arguing you're scum, so that doesn't make sense since he is already pushing to move you out of the townblock.
Again for such an analysis driven player it's weird how shallowly he's approaching the gsmestate and how superficial his reaction was to an entirely reasonable proposal.
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:31 am
by ObviousScum
Or you're not scum. I feel like ame has addopted schrodinger's law for his read of you lol
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:49 am
by insomnia
What's your non-mechanical assessment of the Looker slot?
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:55 am
by Wimpy
In post 1293, ObviousScum wrote:The vig basically is a cop that also happens to flip his target.
never heard it explained like that before
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:58 am
by Ame
It's not reasonable at all. I've made the same suggestions verbatim as scum. Saying that you're an inno checker rather than a guilt checker is semantics. In both cases you should investigate someone scummy.
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 9:59 am
by insomnia
I'm like feeling fine with the Looker lynch flipping red here, but given I am always letting people get in my head, I will probably switch to someone else, although I wished we voted there.
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:02 am
by ObviousScum
In post 1297, Ame wrote:It's not reasonable at all. I've made the same suggestions verbatim as scum. Saying that you're an inno checker rather than a guilt checker is semantics. In both cases you should investigate someone scummy.
Perhaps. So you would assert that neither wimpy or somni are scummy then?
