Mafiascum.net

In post 1274, Hoctac wrote:Sorry, I am all out of Serious Reads™ for today. I would like to consult my associate,

Mastina

, to cite some examples for me (436, 964 to get you started).

so having serious reads is scummy. Ok gotcha lmao

In post 1269, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1267, Quick wrote:VOTE: ETL

Was going to do this before going to bed but now is an okay time.

I feel betrayed.

My theory is that you tried to deep pocket me. I mean, nothing else is really working for me rn. Doesn't really matter where I go, people end up saying the OPPOSITE of what I am saying. Then there is Nero.

Whatever. Why did I come back here?

VOTE: Jake the Wolfie

Also, is a good reason not to vote someone because they have 5 votes or did I not see the full argument there?

In post 1266, Saudade wrote:

In post 1223, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 1201, Quick wrote:Actually, no. This is spicier...

VOTE: Miss Lynch

In post 1214, Quick wrote:

In post 1208, Tchill13 wrote:suaded is a lurker...

lurking around the wuhan facility and getting us infected. he needs to GO.

I'd rather go here, honestly.

VOTE: Jake the Wolfie

quick is just making it known hes not voting suadade lol.

why are you voting suadade

"Scum Slip!!!!"

youve done it twice now. its all youve really done.

Okay...

VOTE: Saudade

Let's just get the day over with already.

Actually I just read Saudades ISO and I feel less inclined to bother with him over Jake/5G if we’re talking about “worthless slots”, which to be fairly honest, would be a last resort lynch option in my book. At least hoctac and saudade are posting game stuff. I also switched up saudade and hoctac in terms of who was scumreading me, saudades iso doesn’t show that he was ever scumreading me so I was wrong there.

I don’t feel like lynching hoc anymore either cuz it looks like he’s actually doing something even if it’s ridiculous.

Can we discuss who might actually be scum that doesn’t involve “lurking” or “fluff posting” as a reason? It’s very very late for me now so I’m going to bed but I’d like to go over that tomorrow.

UNVOTE:

I’ll have to reassess in the AM.

In post 1279, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 1266, Saudade wrote:

In post 1223, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 1201, Quick wrote:Actually, no. This is spicier...

VOTE: Miss Lynch

In post 1214, Quick wrote:

In post 1208, Tchill13 wrote:suaded is a lurker...

lurking around the wuhan facility and getting us infected. he needs to GO.

I'd rather go here, honestly.

VOTE: Jake the Wolfie

quick is just making it known hes not voting suadade lol.

why are you voting suadade

"Scum Slip!!!!"

youve done it twice now. its all youve really done.

is that it?

do you scumread me or what more content from me tchill13

In post 1284, Saudade wrote:do you scumread me or what more content from me tchill13

Do you have any content to offer? How about on D2?

Where are my European friends?

In post 1104, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 1102, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I don’t remember what is an arsonist

They go around dousing people in gas each Night and then on a single night they ignite the gas and kill everyone they doused.

So odd, just sitting around not doing anything, but then pops in to answer the mech-question in the middle of a long discussion between ETL/other guy

In post 1160, Nero Cain wrote:"traps" and "reaction tests" are kinda low tier plays

VOTE: ari

Thoughts on the one Auro did?

In post 1170, Auro wrote:Gosh, can someone just summarize what happened in the last few hours?

shit, my mind is starting to confbias a scumread on auro

In post 1176, Auro wrote:

In post 1171, Tchill13 wrote:enough ppl have openly TR'd auro for me to be fine with that slot. I lean town there to begin with and it just seems like a general consensus atm.

After some thought I'm beginning to think it's good not to state stronger townreads? It just primes them for infection.

Refer to my earlier strategy.

1: Solve the game Day 1 so we dont end up getting stuck in the "OMG LOOK HOW DIFF THIS SLOT IS NOW BEHAVING", which will result in way too many mislynches

2: Lynch the initial 3 scum members, hopefully strongly reducing their ability to spread the shit

3: Use whatever mechanical gimmick is available to make 50% of us immune

In post 1204, Auro wrote:

In post 1199, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bah. What will we get from it though? That’s the problem. If we’re gonna lynch a lurky person t should be one that has had other people discussing it. Otherwise we really get nothing.

Sure. Hence we wagon them to generate discussion, probably cycle through a few, and then proceed to lynch.

Auro sadly is just busy stating things he thinks will sound good and make people townread him. He's not actually doing genuine reads on the playerlist. He is not trying to solve so far.

I actually think Auro is scum here

In post 1218, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1217, Quick wrote:

In post 1215, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1204, Auro wrote:

In post 1199, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bah. What will we get from it though? That’s the problem. If we’re gonna lynch a lurky person t should be one that has had other people discussing it. Otherwise we really get nothing.

Sure. Hence we wagon them to generate discussion, probably cycle through a few, and then proceed to lynch.

Well yeah but you don’t generally say that’s what you’re doing or it defeats the purpose if they know they aren’t actually getting lynched. This kinda stuff happens naturally anyway for the most part, especially on day one.

That's why we lynch worthless slots.

THUS. HOCTAC.

Also brushed off suspicion on another one of my scumreads Hoctac as "just meme'ing".

Auro, noooo

In post 1243, Auro wrote:

In post 1227, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 1221, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1200, Auro wrote:I like annoying Nero.

I'm not very annoyed. try harder.

If i remember correctly i can teach you how auro lmao.

I would love to learn. xD

VOTE: Hoctac

huh

In post 1293, Vecna wrote:

In post 1218, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1217, Quick wrote:

In post 1215, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1204, Auro wrote:

In post 1199, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bah. What will we get from it though? That’s the problem. If we’re gonna lynch a lurky person t should be one that has had other people discussing it. Otherwise we really get nothing.

Sure. Hence we wagon them to generate discussion, probably cycle through a few, and then proceed to lynch.

Well yeah but you don’t generally say that’s what you’re doing or it defeats the purpose if they know they aren’t actually getting lynched. This kinda stuff happens naturally anyway for the most part, especially on day one.

That's why we lynch worthless slots.

THUS. HOCTAC.

Also brushed off suspicion on another one of my scumreads Hoctac as "just meme'ing".

Auro, noooo

I don't see Auro getting lynched at this point in the game...

In post 1262, Hoctac wrote:VOTE: EspeciallyTheLies

I wasn't kidding, Tchill; I don't know what Auro is on about. I will solve this game given enough information, and that is a fact.

Of all the slots that mentioned Hoctac, he feels the need to respond to the snippet from Auro

Im seeing connections!

My brain is generating that conspiracy trajectory

In post 1264, Saudade wrote:

In post 1251, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1247, Auro wrote:

In post 1228, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 1224, Quick wrote:Saud actually adds value to the game and all these other players don't

wat

Some players don't project town at all, but have generally good reads. Saudade hard-projects scum as either alignment but his reads are often correct.

Not in this game so far.

did you just scum slip

In post 1265, Saudade wrote:how do you know if my reads are correct or not?

big yikes here too

In post 1272, Auro wrote:

In post 1270, Hoctac wrote:A lot of her takes are forced and over the top, and she expresses unnatural overconfidence at times.

Explain with examples, pl0x.

Town Auro would bank on own interpretations and not ask someone else to do the work to convince him.

This is try-hard to appear towny, but not tryhard to gamesolve

daves unvoted and doesn't vote anyone he is suspicious of???? Why no pressure on any of the spots your suspect dave?
@EtL: WHY???? okay I saw why after but I'm getting a good vibe reading Quick and his interaction between Nero and Venca.
@Venca: what are the difference between with Auro's game play
over the top is a scum read? This game? Hard no.
I half want to hug EtL, but I think it went from 0 to 60 pretty hard for very little reason. And please don't get pissy about this, just reads like you had some bad experiences and you are touchy about it now.
Lots of interesting things reading about the mechanic possibilities. It sounds like they infect a player but a player could be immune or get immune. I didn't even think about if they just kill everyone at once. I haven't checked if anything was on the first page about kills. I just thought this was a cult game.
you broke my heart
Liking Tchill's response and return into the game. Agreed with his assessment of EtL.
hmmmm could vote those with no scum reads or no pushes. *shakes head* Mmmm I'll sit on this to see what happens before I make a final thought on it.
Hotoc at least is inputing something into this game over wolfe Or 5G
@hotacwhy vote EtL
I really don't get the vote from quick onto EtL at all.
not a scum tell
I'm going to go off the walls and poke at someone else who hasn't really progressed in so far as reads go. Just a few drag comments and not really seeing much as far as reads in the game go.

VOTE: Alchemist