Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:21 pm
I don't follow 1271 either.In post 1273, Redados wrote:nah, I entertained it and it's because 1266 doesn't make sense. I don't follow her logic.
Page 52 of 167
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:21 pm
+1In post 1270, Tayl0r Swift wrote:stop doing preflip associativesIn post 1263, Noraa wrote:I don't see why scum!redados would wanna say shelly and I aren't scum but that might be something that ur saying to try to make me think its not a shelly/redados solve
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:21 pm
this is like super weird? I don't think entertaining me+noraa scumteam = delusional? I don't like you using the numbers to read redados and you end up wifoming yourselfIn post 1271, Noraa wrote:No I think it would be to get me off ur tail. The reason is that anyone that assumes Shelly and I ended up both rolling scum again has to be a low-key delusional townie that wants the pieces that clearly don't fit together to fit together. You saying you ruled out the possibility just makes u sound more town cuz the probability of that happening is literally god knows how low. And considering a possibility that is literally so damn small definitely looks town imo. But then I'm kinda like mmm what if scum!redados is trying to change my mind with this bc he knows I overthink the shit outta everything and anything?
quoting myself, sometimes town are just town. and scum are just scum.
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:22 pm
redados saying +1 to everything taylor says is concerning
im trying to entertain counterfactuals as much as I can
im trying to entertain counterfactuals as much as I can
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:23 pm
no its not. stopppppp
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:24 pm
why?In post 1274, Redados wrote:yes.In post 1272, shellyc wrote:1250 was directed at @taylor, but sure I'll take itIn post 1258, Redados wrote:yeah I think you're scummy, but the past couple of pages point to ShellyC and Noraa not being scum partners imo
if you think we aren't S/S do you think scum is noraa and town is me then?
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:24 pm
taylor why are you blatantly defending redados
hmmm im thinking taylor/redados or noraa/owen as The Worlds
hmmm im thinking taylor/redados or noraa/owen as The Worlds
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:25 pm
i mean theyre independent probabilities. saying the two of you were scum together last time does not mean youre not scum together this time. it doesnt mean you are. its just a thing that is.In post 1271, Noraa wrote:No I think it would be to get me off ur tail. The reason is that anyone that assumes Shelly and I ended up both rolling scum again has to be a low-key delusional townie that wants the pieces that clearly don't fit together to fit together. You saying you ruled out the possibility just makes u sound more town cuz the probability of that happening is literally god knows how low. And considering a possibility that is literally so damn small definitely looks town imo. But then I'm kinda like mmm what if scum!redados is trying to change my mind with this bc he knows I overthink the shit outta everything and anything?
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:26 pm
im gonna continue to defend everyone from what i see are bad arguments. im still voting redados and i still scumread redados. and youre doing preflip associations again.In post 1281, shellyc wrote:taylor why are you blatantly defending redados
hmmm im thinking taylor/redados or noraa/owen as The Worlds
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:27 pm
why are preflip associations bad
interactions are literally the whole point of Mafia
interactions are literally the whole point of Mafia
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:27 pm
also, why do you feel obligation to be everyone's knight in shining armour and defend them from bad arguments because its not your job to do that
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:28 pm
that one was tongue in cheek because I think Noraa was complaining about it. I didn't realize that it was to Taylor every time, I was just doing it to stuff I agreed with, oopsIn post 1278, shellyc wrote:redados saying +1 to everything taylor says is concerning
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:29 pm
I think Noraa is pretty scummy, I scumread her more than I scumread Shelly. I also think Shelly is scummy, but like I explained I don't think that she and Noraa are scum together.In post 1280, Tayl0r Swift wrote:why?In post 1274, Redados wrote:yes.In post 1272, shellyc wrote:1250 was directed at @taylor, but sure I'll take itIn post 1258, Redados wrote:yeah I think you're scummy, but the past couple of pages point to ShellyC and Noraa not being scum partners imo
if you think we aren't S/S do you think scum is noraa and town is me then?
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:29 pm
she keeps saying stuff that makes a lot of sense, I'm not complainingIn post 1285, shellyc wrote:also, why do you feel obligation to be everyone's knight in shining armour and defend them from bad arguments because its not your job to do that
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:29 pm
second sentence of that is kinda self aware? or am I reading too much into things
pedit: can you explain WHY I am scummy? since ive seen your noraa minicase
pedit: can you explain WHY I am scummy? since ive seen your noraa minicase
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:30 pm
but trying to say "this person is mafia because this person is mafia" only works if you know one is mafia. otherwise its just pure speculation that could be TvT and its much easier for scum to do preflip associations since they actually know who has what alignment. two people being scum together is only helpful if theyre scummy. them having interactions or defending each other does not make them scum. its a bad way of solvingIn post 1284, shellyc wrote:why are preflip associations bad
interactions are literally the whole point of Mafia
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:31 pm
its everyone's job. bad arguments lead to bad lunches.In post 1285, shellyc wrote:also, why do you feel obligation to be everyone's knight in shining armour and defend them from bad arguments because its not your job to do that
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:32 pm
Yeah redados' reads still have absolute zero content and I'm not sure what to think about that at this point
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:34 pm
having interactions with each other and defending each other is partner equity which could be townblock or scum partners
either way i think it's a valid way of solving but we'll agree to disagree
pedit: noraa stop sheeping
either way i think it's a valid way of solving but we'll agree to disagree
pedit: noraa stop sheeping
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:37 pm
who did I sheep?
u tell me shelly
u tell me shelly
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:37 pm
you sheeped my suspicion on redados for not compellingly casing me.
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:38 pm
line 1: true, but you only know which one it is with a flip. so its a bad argument.In post 1293, shellyc wrote:having interactions with each other and defending each other is partner equity which could be townblock or scum partners
either way i think it's a valid way of solving but we'll agree to disagree
pedit: noraa stop sheeping
line 2: ok, you do you.
line 3: fair point
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:38 pm
wait, nope. what?In post 1295, shellyc wrote:you sheeped my suspicion on redados for not compellingly casing me.
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:38 pm
I haven't really felt that you were scummy since I started being more active but reading through your ISO I see you tunnel, play aggressively, I'm not a fan. If you play like this for the rest of the game though I would feel better.In post 1289, shellyc wrote:second sentence of that is kinda self aware? or am I reading too much into things
pedit: can you explain WHY I am scummy? since ive seen your noraa minicase
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:40 pm
no wtfIn post 1295, shellyc wrote:you sheeped my suspicion on redados for not compellingly casing me.
Taylor is witness and here to prove I'm not the insane one :3In post 1297, Tayl0r Swift wrote:wait, nope. what?In post 1295, shellyc wrote:you sheeped my suspicion on redados for not compellingly casing me.