Page 52 of 76

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:29 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
i do not do "defeatist scum"

i have never been a defeatist scum ever in my entire life.

check my meta. that is not how i play red

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:30 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 1259, MathBlade wrote:Like ....This just looks like a repeat of the mason game where I bear my thoughts to you, you go no and we lose.
this is so gross i cant even

how freaking tunneled do you have to be to manipulate this way seriously.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:31 am
by MathBlade
In post 1272, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:can u try to imagine a peta world and tell me which of his actions doesnt make sense in that world?

you are just assuming peta is innocent and im guilty and tunneling in that world rn.
As I said
Posting a wall implicating Titus then claiming child when child you CCs him doesn’t make sense for Peta scum.

I literally just answered that.

Your loaded language is just ate and it’s spam and annoying.

If you’re town here please shut up and let me work with Titus and see if she can point out where I am wrong if Peta is scum. I just don’t see it.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:33 am
by MathBlade
In post 1276, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1259, MathBlade wrote:Like ....This just looks like a repeat of the mason game where I bear my thoughts to you, you go no and we lose.
this is so gross i cant even

how freaking tunneled do you have to be to manipulate this way seriously.
That’s not manipulation it’s asking her to give me something so we can work together.

You’re really just pissing me off. I am trying to work with confTown to find scum and instead you’re continually insulting me which is hurting your own case

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:34 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
do u think i dont know im shooting myself in the foot here?

thats how pissed off i am at your ridiculous tunnel

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:34 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
ive never seen someone so deep in a tunnel that they just continue to refuse to re-evaluate over and over again.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:35 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
tell me one thing that peta has done today that doesnt make sense if he is scum.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:35 am
by Titus
In post 1262, MathBlade wrote:It really doesn’t Titus.

Peta posted a VCA wall with Cakez still alive on it.

His wall was framed at being against you not Pooky if he is scum.

I don’t think scum goes through an entire play by play then claims child first.

Can you try to explain again how you think peta’s play is scum? I just don’t see it
That wall can be structured. Peta knows exactly what he'd be doing and going up agsinst. The dead guy being at the bottom of the wall. Cmon Math.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:36 am
by MathBlade
In post 1281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:tell me one thing that peta has done today that doesnt make sense if he is scum.
Damn you like the wash cycle.

The wall then claiming child. Already did.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:36 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 1278, MathBlade wrote:You’re really just pissing me off. I am trying to work with confTown to find scum
this is an absurd contention

you are not trying to "find scum"

you are stuck in a ridiculous tunnel and trying to drag titus in with you.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:36 am
by Titus
The VCA is also pandering to me but it's not even a proper VCA.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:37 am
by MathBlade
In post 1282, Titus wrote:
In post 1262, MathBlade wrote:It really doesn’t Titus.

Peta posted a VCA wall with Cakez still alive on it.

His wall was framed at being against you not Pooky if he is scum.

I don’t think scum goes through an entire play by play then claims child first.

Can you try to explain again how you think peta’s play is scum? I just don’t see it
That wall can be structured. Peta knows exactly what he'd be doing and going up agsinst. The dead guy being at the bottom of the wall. Cmon Math.
Dead guy would be in the middle if scum.

Beginning and end are memorable. People skim.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:37 am
by MathBlade
In post 1285, Titus wrote:The VCA is also pandering to me but it's not even a proper VCA.
Then do one. :)

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:38 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
how does claiming child not make sense for peta-scum?

he knows i am the real child so he gets to 1v1 me.

he knows you want me dead cuz of your shittunnel so thats one vote in his pocket already.

how in the world does his claim not make sense to do as peta-scum?

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:41 am
by Titus
It would help if you got me the VCs. If I can get my door open, I need to run errands before DnD. Most likely I'll be inside though.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:51 am
by MathBlade
Spoiler: VCs
In post 408, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.0


Not Voting
(9): Bingle, Galron, DkKoba, petapan, DeasVail, Pink Ball, SirCakez, MathBlade, PookyTheMagicalBear

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-10 23:39:00)


lets go!!!!
In post 444, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.1


DkKoba
(2): SirCakez, MathBlade
MathBlade
(1): DkKoba
petapan
(1): Galron
Pink Ball
(1): Bingle

Not Voting
(4): petapan, DeasVail, Pink Ball, PookyTheMagicalBear

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-10 23:39:00)
In post 610, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.2


DkKoba
(3): PookyTheMagicalBear, Bingle, MathBlade
petapan
(2): Galron, Pink Ball
DeasVail
(1): DkKoba
Pink Ball
(1): SirCakez
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail

Not Voting
(1): petapan

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-10 23:39:00)
In post 672, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.3


DkKoba
(3): PookyTheMagicalBear, Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(2): Galron, Pink Ball
Pink Ball
(1): SirCakez
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail

Not Voting
(2): petapan, MathBlade

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-10 23:39:00)
In post 692, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.3


DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(2): Galron, Pink Ball
DeasVail
(1): MathBlade
Pink Ball
(1): SirCakez
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail
SirCakez
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(1): petapan

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-10 23:39:00)
In post 812, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.4


DeasVail
(3): MathBlade, petapan, SirCakez
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(2): Galron, Pink Ball
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail
SirCakez
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
--frozen--
and 1 day and 12 hours will be given upon replacement.
In post 826, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.5


DeasVail
(3): petapan, SirCakez, Pink Ball
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(1): Galron
Pink Ball
(1): MathBlade
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail
SirCakez
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
--frozen--
and 1 day and 12 hours will be given upon replacement.
In post 905, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.6 - (unchanged)


DeasVail
(3): petapan, SirCakez, Pink Ball
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(1): Galron
Pink Ball
(1): MathBlade
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail
SirCakez
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
--frozen--
and 1 day and 12 hours will be given upon replacement.
In post 934, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.7


DeasVail
(3): petapan, SirCakez, Pink Ball
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
SirCakez
(2): PookyTheMagicalBear, MathBlade
petapan
(1): Galron
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): DeasVail

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
--frozen--
and 1 day and 12 hours will be given upon replacement.
In post 961, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.8


DeasVail
(3): petapan, SirCakez, Pink Ball
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(2): Galron, DeasVail
SirCakez
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(1): MathBlade

5 majority. Deadline in
--frozen--
and 1 day and 12 hours will be given upon replacement.
In post 1004, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.9


DeasVail
(3): petapan, SirCakez, Pink Ball
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(2): Galron, DeasVail
MathBlade
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): MathBlade

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
--frozen--
and 1 day and 12 hours will be given upon replacement.


Regarding replacement
: I am going to attempt to find a replacement for another 24 hours. After that, I will unfreeze the deadline. Then during the night phase, I will continue to look for a replacement -- if none are to be found, I will modkill the slot. PM me if this solution is unpalatable to you.
In post 1007, Errantparabola wrote:Titus replaces Galron. Thank you!
In post 1008, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.10


DeasVail
(3): petapan, SirCakez, Pink Ball
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(2): Titus, DeasVail
MathBlade
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): MathBlade

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-13 13:30:00)
In post 1038, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.11


DeasVail
(3): SirCakez, Pink Ball, MathBlade
DkKoba
(2): Bingle, DkKoba
petapan
(1): DeasVail
Pink Ball
(1): Titus
MathBlade
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): petapan

Not Voting
(0):

5 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-13 13:30:00)
In post 1066, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 1.12 - final


DkKoba
(5): Bingle, DkKoba, PookyTheMagicalBear, DeasVail, Pink Ball
DeasVail
(2): SirCakez, MathBlade
Pink Ball
(1): Titus
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): petapan

Not Voting
(0):
In post 1069, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 2.0


Not Voting
(7): Titus, Bingle, petapan, DeasVail, SirCakez, MathBlade, PookyTheMagicalBear

7 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-18 01:14:00)
In post 1090, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 2.1


DeasVail
(2): MathBlade, Titus

Not Voting
(5): Bingle, petapan, DeasVail, SirCakez, PookyTheMagicalBear

4 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-18 01:14:00)
In post 1123, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 2.2 - final


DeasVail
(4): MathBlade, Titus, Bingle, PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(3): petapan, DeasVail, SirCakez
In post 1126, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 3.0


Not Voting
(4): Titus, petapan, MathBlade, PookyTheMagicalBear

3 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-21 01:06:00)
In post 1138, Errantparabola wrote:
In post 368, Errantparabola wrote:should i inform scum who the loved parent is next time?
In post 382, Bingle wrote:I'd be interested in seeing what scum knowing which one of them is the loving parent does to the next iteration, btw. It's worth it in my mind to try it at least.
In post 383, Errantparabola wrote:i'll do that + 3 day deadlines
Refer to above conversation about changes made to play to create current iteration.
In post 1171, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 3.1


petapan
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): petapan

Not Voting
(2): Titus, MathBlade

3 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-21 01:06:00)
In post 1232, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 3.2


PookyTheMagicalBear
(2): petapan, MathBlade
petapan
(1): PookyTheMagicalBear

Not Voting
(1): Titus

3 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-21 01:06:00)
In post 1274, Errantparabola wrote:
Votecount 3.3


petapan
(2): PookyTheMagicalBear, Titus
PookyTheMagicalBear
(1): petapan

Not Voting
(1): MathBlade

3 majority. Deadline in
(expired on 2020-12-21 01:06:00)


Enjoy!

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:03 am
by Titus
So DV bussed his partner. The question is whether it was early or late.

UNVOTE: peta

Largely symbolic.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:06 am
by MathBlade
I’ll just wait til you’re done with the VCA so you’re uninterrupted. I am kinda exhausted of this game tbh.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:07 am
by MathBlade
I just feel like I am up against a brick wall.
People will say they listen but they don’t. People say they sheep then they don’t.

Then only when I literally strongarm the day despite it being town do we get a DV elim.

I just feel...exhausted.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:26 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
you could just vote peta and win the game for the town

i wont even blame you for being wrong all the previous time

pls dude

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:27 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 1283, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1281, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:tell me one thing that peta has done today that doesnt make sense if he is scum.
Damn you like the wash cycle.

The wall then claiming child. Already did.
how does claiming child not make sense for peta-scum?

he knows i am the real child so he gets to 1v1 me.

he knows you want me dead cuz of your shittunnel so thats one vote in his pocket already.

how in the world does his claim not make sense to do as peta-scum?

You never responded to my point about why child-claiming makes perfect sense for Peta!scum to do.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:34 am
by petapan
In post 1227, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:"Now assuming Peta scum he claimed first. So he’d have to have know the child was going to die and Bingle to die for his plan to work. It’s a pretty risky shot.

I am leaning Pooky and it seems like Peta put in more effort.

So if Peta you’re scum congrats."

1. Peta claimed after the people died, so he knew he was in a F4, he knew I was the Child, and he knows you literally have been tunnelled on Pooky!Scum the entire game. It absolutely makes sense for him to make the claim there in order to get a 1v1 vs me for the win since he knows you're almost certainly staying in your terrible tunnel on me.

2. "It seems Peta put in more effort"

WHAT DOES IT MATTER WHO PUT IN MORE EFFORT!??!?!

You are not a judge at the Oscars deciding who should get the Best Actor award.


You are IN THIS GAME. Peta will shoot you in the face if I get elim'd here. Do you want to lose?

3. like whats even the point of this? you are on the town's side. you are not on Peta's side.

Look at which actions make sense and which actions don't make sense.

Peta fake-claiming child to set up a 1v1 vs me makes sense

Me counter-claiming Peta when you are hard-tunneled on Me!scum makes 0 sense.
In post 1228, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
In post 1225, MathBlade wrote:No. I wouldn’t. But I think at some point I have to make a decision.

And this one is one I am okay with.
you have 2+ days to deadline

this is elo

and you are just staying in the same death-tunnel you've been on me for the entire game.

you haven't taken the time to re-evaluate.

you aren't even trying to play the game.

You can't handle the fact that you are wrong on me. so you are just going to elim me.

just wild
In post 1229, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:this is a hard game throw brought to you by mathblade

shit-death-tunneler extraordinaire.

congrats Peta

easiest win of your life
funny you should mention the oscars, because the way you went from "this game probly doesn't even count" to these overblown histrionics makes it looks like
you're
the one trying to win an academy award. it's so fake, so over the top, so out of line with previous expression.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:38 am
by MathBlade
In post 727, petapan wrote:
In post 642, DeasVail wrote:Like I still didn’t strongly think Koba was scum. I was mainly trying to work that out.

And I still don’t know what to think of this
VOTE: deasvail
I don’t think this is a bus vote here.

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:39 am
by petapan
In post 1244, Titus wrote:Math, I think Peta's behavior makes the most scum sense.

Scum, starting today, would know the identity of their child. Therefore, scum!Peta has to make a choice. Does he push scum!Pooky or scum!Titus. He has to make that choice post one. So his thought process is which one will Math miseliminate?

Meanwhile, Pooky knows that Peta will claim child. That's fine to scum Pooky. He just pushes scum!Titus.
you're falling prey to classic overthinking. in the simple proposition, i've been more town, pook hasn't. but, suddenly he counter claims me, and your brain rejects the easy answer, and instead asks, "why would pooky counter claim the peson who looks more town than him as scum?" and so suddenly decide he must be town for...looking less town. it's prizing an answer for being counter-intuitive, rather than being
right
, when in this case it really is just that simple. i fall victim to it all the time late game where i end up thinking up elaborate theories as to who the scumteam is and usually get it wrong, when my earlier instincts were more correct

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:43 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 1296, petapan wrote:funny you should mention the oscars, because the way you went from "this game probly doesn't even count" to these overblown histrionics makes it looks like you're the one trying to win an academy award. it's so fake, so over the top, so out of line with previous expression.
dude just enjoy mathblade handing you a free scum win that may or may not count

ive never seen someone so tunneled in my life lol