Mafiascum.net

In post 1196, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1194, Rannygazoo wrote:So what are we going to do if the claim is proven false and then NM is like “LOL I TROL U, lemme make up another claim real quick”

You execute them.

Implying that if the neighborizer claim is false, you’re not going to put up with more BS.

In post 1268, Andresvmb wrote:I honestly just assumed Tracker was the actual claim,

Oh oh! Things are not what they seem!

How is this so hard for you to understand?

Your current behavior with regards to something that was at-best antitown to mention at all doesn't really sit well with me.

Also yaaaaaay hella people are claiming D1 again. Good job, guys. You're really doing the job well here. [/sarcasm]

I think I’m done discussing it.

In post 1243, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Binatog

In post 1249, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: bbmolla

@DBG sell me on one of these.

1 shot loyal neighborizer

@chkflip I don’t think it’s anti-town to want to nail down a claim from someone who dodged an elim by claiming. I also think the tracker soft was obvious and if NM is town, scum was benefiting from it more because they can tell each other. If you want to talk about it more, we can, but I don’t think either of us wants that.

Except you have no way of knowing as Town if either Claim is true, but you know as Scum that one of them has to be true, if Not_Mafia is Town. So, how exactly would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Do you want to explain that?

If Not_Mafia is completely full of it, it would become obvious to a decent enough Town at some point. Either Claim, actually. That’s why I wasn’t worried about narrowing it down.

You can disagree with me about your newly shown antitown behavior, but that doesn't actually make it less antitown. Assuming scum saw, read, and discussed the claim actually gives me a whole hell of a lot less incentive to unvote you for what should be an obvious reason. But we can keep not talking about the thing you shouldn't have mentioned to begin with if that makes you feel better.

heybbmolla who hurt you

In post 1281, Andresvmb wrote:Except you have no way of knowing as Town if either Claim is true, but you know as Scum that one of them has to be true, if Not_Mafia is Town. So, how exactly would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Do you want to explain that?

Andres, maybe you know the other players here better than I do, but I don’t trust town to not let NM get away with switching claims unless I make noise about it.

In post 1284, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 1281, Andresvmb wrote:Except you have no way of knowing as Town if either Claim is true, but you know as Scum that one of them has to be true, if Not_Mafia is Town. So, how exactly would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Do you want to explain that?

Andres, maybe you know the other players here better than I do, but I don’t trust town to not let NM get away with switching claims unless I make noise about it.

The problem I have is that your noise is at best completely useless today. And at worst, it’s Scum posturing. You can make all the noise you want right now. It’s worthless.

You still haven’t answered my question - how would your position change if the Claim was narrowed down? Would it?

I don’t have a master plan. I didn’t know what to make of it. That’s why I asked an exploratory question. I wanted to discuss what it meant and how to proceed.

In post 1225, Rannygazoo wrote:Since we’re discussing NM’s claim in detail, what do you make of the tracker soft?

In post 1287, Rannygazoo wrote:I don’t have a master plan. I didn’t know what to make of it. That’s why I asked an exploratory question. I wanted to discuss what it meant and how to proceed.

In post 1225, Rannygazoo wrote:Since we’re discussing NM’s claim in detail, what do you make of the tracker soft?

You are still avoiding giving me a straight answer. Just sit down and think about it.

In post 1212, Rannygazoo wrote:Oh. That’s kind of powerful.

ARE WE DONE TALKING ABOUT CLAIMS

Where are these quotes coming from

In post 1288, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1287, Rannygazoo wrote:I don’t have a master plan. I didn’t know what to make of it. That’s why I asked an exploratory question. I wanted to discuss what it meant and how to proceed.

In post 1225, Rannygazoo wrote:Since we’re discussing NM’s claim in detail, what do you make of the tracker soft?

You are still avoiding giving me a straight answer. Just sit down and think about it.

Sorry, I thought you were asking about my motive for bringing it up. You were asking for something completely different.

I would have less of a gut feeling that NM is setting up to dodge an elim with a claim for a second time.

I think you’ve grossly misjudged the benefit to you from getting this extra information, with the obvious benefit Scum would derive from the extra information. Why? I don’t know. I’m done debating this. Hopefully you understand why chkflip for example is being so cut and dry about it.

In post 1032, Bypasser Catcher wrote:this is flipping town

Are you talking about Not Mafia's slot?

If so how do you know?

In post 1293, MiniMegabyte wrote:

In post 1032, Bypasser Catcher wrote:this is flipping town

Are you talking about Not Mafia's slot?

If so how do you know?

This is what you pick out of everything to comment on?

Oh wait fuck, I forgot to shitpost

Errrrrrrm

So what's the deal with aeroplane food?

In post 1072, Hayker wrote:I strongly dislike posts like this. "everything I said is useful" Just insisting that ones own play is good. Never a good thing to see.

Are you trying to force yourself to scum read someone?

In post 1297, Not_Mafia wrote:So what's the deal with aeroplane food?

The Seinfeld-like observational comedians that were popular in the 90s and 2000s just spoke about things in their experience, and as they because successful, they traveled more and had to deal with airplanes more than the average person, so they always had something to say about airplane food. Nowadays airlines don’t serve meals as often, and airplane food has become a meta-joke.