Mafiascum.net

In post 1260, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 1240, Snarky Fishes wrote:It kinda scares me how fast my medea read snapped into place after the initial posts when the thread reopened.

But it did. :/

You know how to reverse engineer my thinking patterns and as soon as you had the initial variables I started with, you reran the simulation?

In post 1277, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1260, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 1240, Snarky Fishes wrote:It kinda scares me how fast my medea read snapped into place after the initial posts when the thread reopened.

But it did. :/

You know how to reverse engineer my thinking patterns and as soon as you had the initial variables I started with, you reran the simulation?

Didn't even stare at the ceiling.

In post 1016, Annie Edison wrote:Bell I would like to circle back to the Titus discussion later.

In post 1242, Sleez wrote:Medea not agreeing with me will be an extremely huge problem. So much that I was willing to reveal myself.

In post 861, Sleez wrote:Annie I agree that you're town but I was left remiss with our conversation earlier about the topic of We. We being where I was even slightly hinting that I might vote Snarky Fishes and you shut it down by basically saying you were acting for the collective unconscious of town because you yourself thought they were town. This is destructive for D1 and people should vote whoever they want. That's the beauty of D1 and you don't give potential scum a prerogative so early. It's destructive and leads to confirmation bias, and very few people are good enough to have their confirmation bias be completely holistic D1.

In post 886, Sleez wrote:Titus seems unfamiliar to anything going on and doesn't seem like she cares.

In post 1014, Snarky Fishes wrote:I already asked Dunnstrall if they were scum.

I have two issues:
1. Shard handing out when we were possibly in auto-lose if the game wasn't adjusted.
2. I feel like their Titus read should be the exact opposite of the conclusion they reached. What's to stop Titus from lying about their ability or for them to be scum wanting an extra shard or somethin.

In post 1015, Snarky Fishes wrote:Or any other scenario really.*

-Bell.

In post 1286, Dunnstral wrote:Are you saying asking for a shard was slayer's gambit

In post 1086, Snarky Fishes wrote:Congratulations on your 5th anniversary.

No, Spiffeh, I won't town bin you just because you've asked and made some minor commentary and slightly wry self-observations


-Bell.

In post 1093, Spiffeh wrote:

In post 782, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 772, Snarky Fishes wrote:VOTE: Spiffeh

Bad mouse.

-Bell

This made me look back at his iso lol

**Spiffeh throws manatee a lifeline**

**Manatee has a questionable response**

**Spiffeh abandons the thread**

In post 1141, Medea the Alien wrote:While penguin works on her big post, let me casually just drop our bracketed reads completely naked ITT to generate a bunch of pages worth of P-edits for her.

{Dunnstral, Lady Rhea, Sleez, Fferyllt}
{Bell, Annie Edison, Pooky}
{Save the Ceph, AA9, Titus, Spiff}
{ManateeLass}
{Luke}

In post 1270, Medea the Alien wrote:Iirc arc angel is generally unavailable on weekends. Same for Titus. That's what I meant about warped sense of post counts with the additional note that AA9 is in India so time zones are a thing.

In post 1052, Medea the Alien wrote:TLDR us getting killed under the original very tight 7 demon wincon is bad so we want to be in the middle of the pack in read lists.

In post 1070, Spiffeh wrote:

In post 666, Sleez wrote:

In post 663, Snarky Fishes wrote:Well Manatee, are you caught scum?

Why are you asking this you nitwit. It's not like she's going to say yes. If your immediate response is that you're testing her reaction when she's shown to already be a very reactionary person I will send you to your grave.

This is a bad post. Not really understanding the Sleez town reads in general? @notty can you elaborate or point me to where you do so?

On a related note, while I'm not townreading Lukewarm I also don't like Sleez's reasoning for scum reading him which, unless I'm missing a major component, boils down to him being the worst vote on Medea (fine) and not liking that Lukewarm unvoted Medea while they were being run up, which is a very reasonable thing to do early on Day 1? I specifically don't like that she doubles down on it here and here. It feels like an unwarranted attack on Luke just to have something to do.

To be fair I think they have a little back-and-forth coming up that results in her read reversing that I have to dig into but I didn't like her immediate initial confidence there, the punishment doesn't really fit the crime.

In post 1134, Medea the Alien wrote:With the caveat that if people decline when voted to receive a shard, that should be respected and not seen as an entry point to debate. That gives scum too much info. Let them wonder if it's an already-powered player or someone who's always vanilla or someone with a shit power.

In post 1141, Medea the Alien wrote:While penguin works on her big post, let me casually just drop our bracketed reads completely naked ITT to generate a bunch of pages worth of P-edits for her.

{Dunnstral, Lady Rhea, Sleez, Fferyllt}
{Bell, Annie Edison, Pooky}
{Save the Ceph, AA9, Titus, Spiff}
{ManateeLass}
{Luke}