Mafiascum.net

In post 1273, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1272, marcistar wrote:but i dont think the way he did it was scummy..?

in my pov it just looks like "i see what ur saying, but i like the way i see it more."
am i understanding wrong?

YES, and thats the thing I find scummy :^)

I feel like I say that sort of thing a lot as town

In post 1253, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1240, Galron wrote:

In post 1232, superbowl9 wrote:Sorry I can't help it sometimes

I was just memorializing the observation I'd made a couple of days ago.

Fwiw i purposely try to keep my meta different
But have we even played together where I was town?? iirc I only had that one scum treestump game against you

Yeah, a few times.

I say that stuff all the time, especially when I'm making an effort to try to see things through their eyes as if they were town. I think it's a smart thing to do in difficult games.

In post 1249, T3 wrote:

In post 1246, Galron wrote:

In post 1236, T3 wrote:

In post 1227, Galron wrote:You haven't been playing to your town meta superbowl. At least from the games I've played with you.

my god

In post 1237, T3 wrote:the openwolfing.... the scale my tiny brain can't even comprehend...

I don't know if this is at me or at sb.

owl

If it's at Superbowl, why did you vote me? Why aren't you voting superbowl?

In post 1274, marcistar wrote:

In post 1273, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1272, marcistar wrote:but i dont think the way he did it was scummy..?

in my pov it just looks like "i see what ur saying, but i like the way i see it more."
am i understanding wrong?

YES, and thats the thing I find scummy :^)

...
i.. dont understand...

who stole my braincells tonight :<

dw i dont have any either

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1273, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1272, marcistar wrote:but i dont think the way he did it was scummy..?

in my pov it just looks like "i see what ur saying, but i like the way i see it more."
am i understanding wrong?

YES, and thats the thing I find scummy :^)

I feel like I say that sort of thing a lot as town

no else convincing enough for me(that has scum equity) to vote atm

In post 1279, HockeyFan wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1273, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1272, marcistar wrote:but i dont think the way he did it was scummy..?

in my pov it just looks like "i see what ur saying, but i like the way i see it more."
am i understanding wrong?

YES, and thats the thing I find scummy :^)

I feel like I say that sort of thing a lot as town

no else convincing enough for me(that has scum equity) to vote atm

vote galron for clear skin

Noxezma.

Or Noxzema even.

ever since ive started scumreading u, my zits have been clearing up.... explain that hmm..?

In post 1280, marcistar wrote:

In post 1279, HockeyFan wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1273, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1272, marcistar wrote:but i dont think the way he did it was scummy..?

in my pov it just looks like "i see what ur saying, but i like the way i see it more."
am i understanding wrong?

YES, and thats the thing I find scummy :^)

I feel like I say that sort of thing a lot as town

no else convincing enough for me(that has scum equity) to vote atm

vote galron for clear skin

I already have clear skin . Also i dont sr galron enough atm

In post 1284, HockeyFan wrote:I already have clear skin . Also i dont sr galron enough atm

wtf u have clear skin and u havent dropped ur skincare routine???? fake friend smh

why dont u scumread galron :<

In post 1283, marcistar wrote:ever since ive started scumreading u, my zits have been clearing up.... explain that hmm..?

Radioactivity prolly.

In post 1285, marcistar wrote:

In post 1284, HockeyFan wrote:I already have clear skin . Also i dont sr galron enough atm

wtf u have clear skin and u havent dropped ur skincare routine???? fake friend smh

why dont u scumread galron :<

srry i cant say my skincare routine

2. Like thier one, they're getting sr'd for reasons I dont agree with, and the ppl scumreading him are /generally/ not in my town core. Besides, I looked over his posts and didnt see anything scummy

In post 1285, marcistar wrote:

In post 1284, HockeyFan wrote:I already have clear skin . Also i dont sr galron enough atm

wtf u have clear skin and u havent dropped ur skincare routine???? fake friend smh

why dont u scumread galron :<

srry i cant say my skincare routine

2. Like thier one, they're getting sr'd for reasons I dont agree with, and the ppl scumreading him are /generally/ not in my town core. Besides, I looked over his posts and didnt see anything scummy

In post 1288, HockeyFan wrote:Like thier one, they're getting sr'd for reasons I dont agree with, and the ppl scumreading him are /generally/ not in my town core. Besides, I looked over his posts and didnt see anything scummy

u dont like my reasons..? : - ( whats wrong with them..?

whats ur read on save the dragons

In post 1289, marcistar wrote:

In post 1288, HockeyFan wrote:Like thier one, they're getting sr'd for reasons I dont agree with, and the ppl scumreading him are /generally/ not in my town core. Besides, I looked over his posts and didnt see anything scummy

u dont like my reasons..? : - ( whats wrong with them..?

whats ur read on save the dragons

Your case is goodish, but from what ive seen its mainly from a lack of effort which is NAI imo

Also, I have a nullishtown read on STD, he hasnt made it into my town core yet

I'll be back tomorrow.

I'll look to check the game state.

In post 1291, Salsabil Faria wrote:UNVOTE: Salsabil Faria

VOTE: Salsa

That was a little too short-lived for you to unvote so soon. Makes me think that was just performative after all.

In post 1272, marcistar wrote:but i dont think the way he did it was scummy..?

in my pov it just looks like "i see what ur saying, but i like the way i see it more."
am i understanding wrong?

That's more of an RL manipulation tactic than a mafia one.

In post 1278, Galron wrote:

In post 1249, T3 wrote:

In post 1246, Galron wrote:

In post 1236, T3 wrote:

In post 1227, Galron wrote:You haven't been playing to your town meta superbowl. At least from the games I've played with you.

my god

In post 1237, T3 wrote:the openwolfing.... the scale my tiny brain can't even comprehend...

I don't know if this is at me or at sb.

owl

If it's at Superbowl, why did you vote me? Why aren't you voting superbowl?

poorly executed half-joke

In post 1291, Salsabil Faria wrote:UNVOTE: Salsabil Faria

VOTE: Salsa

In post 1290, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1289, marcistar wrote:

In post 1288, HockeyFan wrote:Like thier one, they're getting sr'd for reasons I dont agree with, and the ppl scumreading him are /generally/ not in my town core. Besides, I looked over his posts and didnt see anything scummy

u dont like my reasons..? : - ( whats wrong with them..?

whats ur read on save the dragons

Your case is goodish, but from what ive seen its mainly from a lack of effort which is NAI imo

Also, I have a nullishtown read on STD, he hasnt made it into my town core yet

STD/I are aligned by the principal of gut reactions.

In post 1200, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1149, Kop wrote:

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:Regarding 1052

Worst Scumcase ever :^)

In post 378, Kop wrote:

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I'm only saying that it could be easy to do that. I'm not saying that he did it here, but I've seen it before.

Scum impressions so far, is within Gamma, Grandpa, Titus, T3.

First scum log. Just having generally consesnus sr's is scum+ imo. Also, in this post its a bunch of fence sitting, and not comitting to a read on certain posts. For example, in this post he thinks I didnt fake townslipped but also it could very well be a fake townslip which is super ??, not really taking a stance.

I was simply saying that you could have fake townslipped because I have seen it before in other games, but I'm not taking a stance simply because I'm not going to hold a read based on that. You might have genuinely meant what you said, and not faked it.

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 896, Kop wrote:

In post 698, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

I think it buys a day, if he's alive tomorrow he hardclaims and we go from there

I can sense the reasoning behind this, but I don't like it. It feels like something that scum would be actively thinking, and are setting up the next day.

Again more fence sitting, says he can see the reasoning behind it, but still likes it ?? Says he can sense the reasoning just to say it would be smth scum would be thinking so why do u sense the reasoning behind it? negl, Kop/Superbowl interactions are super weird

Where did I say that I like it?

I can see his reasoning where it comes to day 2 and Roden is still alive he will need to hard claim. Town are going to wonder why a PR is still alive in day 2 because PR's are generally a threat to scum. Scum can easily see this, and will likely be setting up day 2 by creating WIFOM and allowing Roden to live.

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 373, Kop wrote:

In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho

I can see your point on it being a town tell, but could easily be scum faking that they didn't know.

AGAIN, MORE OF THE "I CAN SEE YOUR POINT" BUT IT COULD EASILLY BE "SCUM ....", like you're not willing to take hard stances on certain things which I think comes from scum+

Because like I said above. I'm not going to hold a read based on that. I was simply stating that you could have said what you did, for others to possibly believe it's a town tell and you would get a town read on it. I was taking the stance that I wasn't buying it, but I'm not going to town read you or scum read you based on your comment of day chat.

Kop who do u think is scum and why. Also, WHAT are you basing your reads off of then?

Titus - I don't like the feeling that she tried to buddy up to T3 early in the day. She hasn't really pushed anything, apart from a vote on myself and Salsa, which is the two easiest wagons to go on. And doesn't really have a case on me, other than my reads where she said it's likely all town, but that's her opinion, those are her feels, not mine. Both of her scum reads, and both of her votes, are based on others views, and based on where the flow is going. Yeah, she has actively tried to engage with the game, and tried to form reads, but I just feel that she is piggy backing of other peoples vibes.

SB9 - His constant discussion regarding the soft, rolefishing, he has only really pushed T3 as his scum read, and is happy to vote for Salsa for info even though he has a slight town lean on that slot. I'm sorry, info or no info, I wouldn't vote for a any sort of town lean just for info. Even if that is the way the day is heading, I won't be voting for a town lean of any sort. I just don't get that, I understand lynches provide info, but when you believe that slot is town, I'd personally prefer to try and provide the reasons why I believe I have that town lean whether it be small or big, and that a lynch is better elsewhere. Even if your not listened too, I just don't feel policy lynches. He scum reads T3 but hasn't really pushed his case out there for anyone to really buy into, and hasn't really pushed up anything else.

However, if Salsa ends up being scum, then great, but I'm not saying that I town read her slot right now.

So so far, I'm happy to vote within those 3 right now.

In post 1241, Roden wrote:

In post 1225, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 1224, Roden wrote:Like y'all are mad at Salsa because they're playing anti-town, but sb9 literally and openly scum claimed multiple times and has contributed zero content besides role fishing.

See -- that's the problem roden. We don't know if SF is doing this as scum. It's like we are forced to scumread them. Like ATP -- SB9 could have been that 3rd person I didn't include there that ISN'T pushing SF.

SF is also self-destructing for no real reason. She did the exact same thing in 2223 because no one was listening to her and she ended up being a mid game mis-elim. Voting her out Day 1 because of her play style is a poor reason to do so because if she flips town then we don't get anything out of it. Like what associatives do we get post flip? At most we could maybe scrutinize anyone who TMI'd she was town. If she flips scum then great, but I'm not confident that she will if she's that fine with putting herself at E-1.

Granted, I don't think she's gonna be too helpful going forward anyway. I just think we should always vote out the slot who's scum claiming and playing to their scum meta over someone who's self-destructing over moderate pressure. If wagoning sb9 is really this impossible today then fine, I'll go Salsa and eat crow if she flips red.

I'm not a fan of this entire self vote shit. I've seen it from town, and I've seen it from scum. It feels forced, and I'm not buying it. But if she has did this shit before, it could be the same again here. SF needs to give out a case on T3 or stop playing this shit, simply because it's hard to get beyond it.

jsyk there's a new site rule - you aren't allowed to use the word lynch.