Page 52 of 142

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:29 am
by Wisdom
Can we let him talk

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:38 am
by Titus
In post 1258, Skybird wrote:Visiting people is not something I can do.
There goes that theory.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:39 am
by Titus
In post 1260, GuiltyLion wrote:alright well I don't know if I played this as effectively as I could have, probably if I wasn't out of town last weekend and we had a longer day phase I could have done more but now with fewer than 3 days to go I don't want to delay a lot further. I was hoping to get more in terms of a response from a few players like Wis/Ceph but I don't want to keep withholding.

I have hard info to claim, I am a tracker and last night I tracked Galron to both Whemestar and Skybird. I believe this explains both the Wheme NK and Skybird's claim to lost gold, it is why I am so certain Galron is scum, and I think it's also effectively an inno result on Skybird once we have a scum!Galron flip.
VOTE: Galron

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:41 am
by Titus
In post 1261, GuiltyLion wrote:Also, I've been thinking about it and I'm not sure I completely buy the argument that Juliet was scum. It's based on the idea that town!Juliet would have addressed the fact that she didn't flip in her last will. I agree it's weird she didn't address that, but in a similar vein, why wouldn't a scum!Juliet mention it either? I think there could exist worlds where Juliet is town and genuinely didn't think she needed to reaffirm her claim despite her not flipping.

She might be scum, but I think it's safer going forward if we don't assume that she was
This is understandable. Scum could just janitor the N1 flip by default.

I still am in favor of Juliet scum, but that doesn't mean it's certain. We should still look at both scenarios. I admit that's hard for me though in terms of mafia. I usually deal in given, provable facts rather than investigating. That's why I find it easier to defend people than to push scum.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:41 am
by Titus
EBWOP the D1 flip

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:42 am
by Titus
In post 1269, Icebox wrote:I’m at work, but I’m breaking my rule to say that someone loverized me with Galron.

-Bell
In post 1270, Icebox wrote:Thought Galron might’ve done it but sounds like that’s not the case.

-Bell
This is definitely a scum ability. Hopefully this will be caught out at massclaim if not before then.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:57 am
by Cephrir
meh? i had the ability to loverize myself to someone as town once. i used it as a vig. this is just a better version of that, no?

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:58 am
by Titus
In post 1281, Cephrir wrote:meh? i had the ability to loverize myself to someone as town once. i used it as a vig. this is just a better version of that, no?
Bell didn't do it to himself it sounds like though.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:00 am
by Wisdom
Loverizing others does sound like a scum ability, yep

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:02 am
by Cephrir
Well, not that much point in discussing it, we're going to find out soon.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:03 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
Why are we killing this?

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:11 am
by Wisdom
We're not killing anything until galron explains

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:12 am
by Titus
In post 1285, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why are we killing this?
Did you miss Guilty Lion's guilty?

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:49 am
by DeasVail
In post 1245, Pavowski wrote:
In post 1244, DeasVail wrote:I guess what I lack from Galron is any real effort to look town, and that makes it difficult for me to have him as a strong scumread
I'm never a fan of this argument - they are not trying to look town so they must be town. There are so many assumptions baked into the take.

Do you actually think he's town or do you just not get scum vibes?
For what it's worth, this is not an argument for Galron being town, just me not having Galron as a top scumread.

Obviously circumstances are a little different now though.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:10 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
I've been voting Galron since day 1, I saw the guilty, I'm just wondering how that changed people's minds so quickly without a claim.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:12 am
by Wisdom
Its not even a guilty
Def a buddy or two in those easy votes if hes scum

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
In post 1290, Wisdom wrote:Its not even a guilty
Def a buddy or two in those easy votes if hes scum
I'm on the same vibe with you. It's a little MORE than not a guilty, but less than a guilty. Hitting 2 targets in one night is not possible for almost all roles, and Ffery is the type who has multitasking cooked in for all scum roles.

So it's completely possible Galron is a scum robber+performed the kill. However, he could be something else. Low percentage, compared to the evidence, but since no one appears to want to wait for the evidence, it's a little confusing.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:28 am
by Cephrir
i mean if he has a good claim we can discuss not killing him idk what the concern is with some votes

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:44 am
by Titus
I don't get how his claim could be town.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:47 am
by Wisdom
he hasn't even claimed

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:56 am
by Off The Hook
In post 1269, Icebox wrote:I’m at work, but I’m breaking my rule to say that someone loverized me with Galron.

-Bell
Was this a just-now thing or something from last night? Either way whoever did it is def scum as tying a scumread slot (Galron) to a townread slot (Icebox) is a scum move, I was scum in Hanahaki Disease where they scum factional was to do the exact action of creating a lover pair and the play was p much always “tie town/towny player to scum/scummy player”
Also I don’t wanna speak for marci too much but I feel like she has avoided pushing Galron harder because I’ve been staunchly against it but clearly I fucking suck at reading him if he’s scum here because this’d be the second time a guilty has prevented me from really fudging things up with TRing Galron (though I can actually put my finger on why I TR Galron so I wouldn’t call a town flip out of the realm of possibility)

-GE

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:59 am
by Titus
In post 1294, Wisdom wrote:he hasn't even claimed
Brain wires crossed. I don't see how any claim makes him town.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:09 am
by Off The Hook
In post 1261, GuiltyLion wrote:Also, I've been thinking about it and I'm not sure I completely buy the argument that Juliet was scum. It's based on the idea that town!Juliet would have addressed the fact that she didn't flip in her last will. I agree it's weird she didn't address that, but in a similar vein, why wouldn't a scum!Juliet mention it either? I think there could exist worlds where Juliet is town and genuinely didn't think she needed to reaffirm her claim despite her not flipping.

She might be scum, but I think it's safer going forward if we don't assume that she was
This is also pretty reasonable, though I feel like unless a scum janitor-like role flips I have to distrust her at least a little

-GE

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:16 am
by Bowser Jr.
I can’t speak for anyone else but l was ignoring him after the poison doctor crumb. Spiffy said he was scum at daystart though.

Regardless of role, I have trouble reconciling that with his reaction to the poison claim and not targetting the poisoned person.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:29 am
by Galron
I'm not a poison doc. I was just pointing out that usually there's a way to remedy that. No one's going to design a game where someone is poisoned out of the gate w/out an opportunity at getting cured.