Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2021 4:56 am
can be trueIn post 1273, Wiki wrote:then smth like gera,gamma,ico can be not true
can be trueIn post 1273, Wiki wrote:then smth like gera,gamma,ico can be not true
In post 395, geraintm wrote:In post 309, Wiki wrote:I am a day cop, Dwlee is a checked mafia goon.In post 310, Wiki wrote:Hard claimI am already VOTE: dwleeIn post 314, Wiki wrote:Hard claim 2
if wiki retracts this claim at all, will vote for them untill they are gone from the game
In post 396, Salsabil Faria wrote:Sup babes!
I can doDwleefor no reason (don't catch up yet).
VOTE: Dwlee
In post 398, Datisi wrote:daycop isn't a normal role, pretty sure someone has said that already
VOTE: geraintm
In post 424, Dwlee99 wrote:If traitor game then Gera > salsa > a50 has a decent chance of winning imo
In post 441, geraintm wrote:this post is like....825 times wrongIn post 424, Dwlee99 wrote:If traitor game then Gera > salsa > a50 has a decent chance of winning imo
In post 467, Gamma Emerald wrote:pretty much, and yet also not really
I'm willing to tolerate play that's scummy-looking from salsa except when it's the sort of antagonistic shit like 460, and 462 also makes me very disinclined to give her any room to breathe
In post 471, Gamma Emerald wrote:I know you can play well. As such I'm not going to manufacture excuses for you.
(unvoted from salsa)
In post 479, ChaosOmega wrote:Votecount 1.04
geraintm (3) - Datisi, Almost50, Dwlee99
Selynee (3) - Three, Iconeum, T3
Dwlee99 (2) - geraintm, Wiki
Salsabil Faria (1) - Gamma Emerald
Three (1) - Selynee
Wiki (1) - Salsabil Faria
Datisi (1) - Andresvmb
Not Voting (1) - Dorsey
With 13 players alive, it takes 7 votes to eliminate someone.
Deadline: (expired on 2021-10-31 06:52:46)
At that moment I was barely reading this because of work. Now i can see a whole strange picture. Gamma was doing smth, he became active for some reason (is it called openwolfing? im not sure about terminology). And he has no talking with Gera and about Gera, only talking with Salsa and Dorsey at that moment... Why Gera is not suspicious to you there?In post 491, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: dorsey
I think I was voting him before but that just comes off as scummy awkwardness
In post 818, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay, maybe you're right on geraIn post 794, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 153, geraintm wrote:7 pages already!
This game is going to be too much.
[Space left intentionally blank to crumb]Scum entrance
In post 812, Gamma Emerald wrote:if it's just for stuff regarding the daycop claim, idc toIn post 773, Dwlee99 wrote:Can we vote gera
In post 341, Iconeum wrote:GE's opening is fine to me.
In post 698, Iconeum wrote:i actually vaguely remembering a discussion with gera on D1 where he actually did start contributing and playing on D1 as town so yeahIn post 643, Datisi wrote:i'm trying to remember if town!gera actually does contribute from time to time on d1. i'll probably do a cursory meta check if gera starts picking up votes again.In post 639, Andresvmb wrote:@Datisi I haven’t fully caught up but I saw your cry for help so why not.
I would lean positively on anybody contributing in what you perceive to be a Townie manner despite previous experience dictating that such a player tends to avoid doing that (in this case, geraintm).
also the reason i asked you specifically is since you mentioned having gera meta knowledge, so. y'know.
pedit: i'm townleaning you rn, yes. but you're also the only person to specifically mention gera-meta, so who else do i ask.
weak. when a man is scum some times in a row he tries to be completely different every time, comparing with previous games. always.In post 1285, Datisi wrote:my last game with iconeum begs to differ