Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 3:57 pm
This is stronger than my thing but if my thing is right I still get to feel good about itIn post 1274, SCP 999 wrote:cephrir treated enchant's "slip" much more harshly than cakez's mechanics slip btw.
This is stronger than my thing but if my thing is right I still get to feel good about itIn post 1274, SCP 999 wrote:cephrir treated enchant's "slip" much more harshly than cakez's mechanics slip btw.
Cephrir wrote:i did not realize what research immune meant
Cephrir wrote:uIn post 981, SirCakez wrote:I feel like you've been more aggressive in past town games I've played with you yeahIn post 976, Cephrir wrote:have i ever done this in my life?In post 974, SirCakez wrote:tearing this place apart for scumWho is this atIn post 977, Cephrir wrote:also, do i need to when your claim doesn't add up?
this post tho is interesting ^Cephrir wrote:that's not what an ascetic isIn post 918, SirCakez wrote:ok whatever let's just get this moving
I'm SCP-106 the old man
Each day I can pick someone to take into my pocket dimension that night, where we get a hood. It Ascetizes whoever I pick, so that's why I didn't use it night one. I also think that might be why there was no kill last night - I took T3 and he seemed like a NK target.
what do I have to explain? I took Dwlee again.
when have I ever been a deepwolf LMAOIn post 1149, SCP 999 wrote:Cakez intentionally dodged thread when cephir was believed at e-1 via double vote - cakez was elitelling
I feel that cakez has tried to coast his way to victory with a zyla or I mislim.
The fact he hasnt pushed me is probably the most egregious thing fmpov. He seems like the designated deepwolf.
Infinity was at least 1/2
see look at thisIn post 1040, SCP 999 wrote:dwlee would you mind going for cephrir here first - I have the gut feeling enchant is town and would like to actually force scum to kill and i think cephrir slot is scum from all angles here
I've had them as town for pretty much the whole gameIn post 1172, Dwlee99 wrote:I wanted his progression on you but HE WENT MISSING
bruhh this actually seems like a town reaction thoughIn post 1189, T3 wrote:WHATIn post 1158, SCP 999 wrote:hey dwlee we have a scumslip hahahahaIn post 1156, T3 wrote:999 was breached
this would be such a waste of time and not prove that muchIn post 1224, SCP 999 wrote:at most we can no lim twice so cakez can confirm that my role is as I say it is, first time they use it to target me and see it roleblocks and then the 2nd time they see i can turn it off with my activated ability.
but also thats a waste of time and im towny as fk anyways so.
I try to give LLD the benefit of the doubt because I enjoy playing with herIn post 1239, SCP 999 wrote:Subject: Mini 2240: SCP Upick (SCP 682 Ending)
cephrir seems very interested in defending LLD though - like throughout the day.Cephrir wrote:nahIn post 674, SCP 999 wrote:1) there was only 1 kill. I am a self protective who self disabled protection. Occams razor can conclude with known information that there is an equal chance that there was a save and that there was no vig shot.
2) lld claimed 1 shot. We have no future way to verify the claim now according to her.
3) the only proof of ability used is resources drained. The win con for scum is to gain a majority/plurality or drain all resources. It is reasonable to think there is a chance they have resource draining abilities.
all of this makes the claim NAI and should NOT be at all factoring into your read on her - like seriously i have not once mentioned that I scumread her off the claim and that the fact theres no proof just maintains plausibility.
i agree that scum vigs are possible, but they're not the most likely thing, and so it's enough to look past the slot especially when there are plenty of others i have equally no reason to townread
i don't think scum took a shot on someone who was going to come under fire today with their normal nightkill
but also cakez does it but also its cakez so lul