Mafiascum.net

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

This is an interesting post. How do you know mafia would know exactly what happened? Granted this is my first Upick, but wouldn’t simple logic dictate that someone would have a role to counter information?

I do not like this post at all.

We're still trying to spec over a hider death?

There is literally too many options to narrow down at this stage.

Just saying.

And thus my incredible streak of being townread by people I'm trying to eliminate continues

I can't tell if this is a curse or a gift

In post 1267, Galron wrote:

In post 1261, Taly wrote:And here I was just about to ask you on your zefiend vote.

I woke up at 1:30 AM and my self was telling my self to vote taly.

I think Zefiend is lhf. In the poe and should be killed regardless of alignment.

So you're voting me for taking the path of least resistance?

VOTE: zefiend

I hadn't considered the possibility Taly might be Ascetic. Nice catch.

Taly, I'll quote it after work

In post 1278, Taly wrote:

In post 1267, Galron wrote:

In post 1261, Taly wrote:And here I was just about to ask you on your zefiend vote.

I woke up at 1:30 AM and my self was telling my self to vote taly.

I think Zefiend is lhf. In the poe and should be killed regardless of alignment.

So you're voting me for taking the path of least resistance?

No. Your vote on zefiend has nothing to do with my waking moment of thought. (probably has something to do with it, but nothing of which I'm consciously aware)

In post 1275, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

This is an interesting post. How do you know mafia would know exactly what happened? Granted this is my first Upick, but wouldn’t simple logic dictate that someone would have a role to counter information?

I do not like this post at all.

You disliking everything i say and do.
Because you are mafia.
So you can as well dislike everyone.
No one cares.

So these posts are useless, push me harder and more reasonable or get lost.

In post 1281, Enchant wrote:

In post 1275, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

This is an interesting post. How do you know mafia would know exactly what happened? Granted this is my first Upick, but wouldn’t simple logic dictate that someone would have a role to counter information?

I do not like this post at all.

You disliking everything i say and do.
Because you are mafia.
So you can as well dislike everyone.
No one cares.

So these posts are useless, push me harder and more reasonable or get lost.

Do I get an answer to the question with the sauce?

In post 1281, Enchant wrote:, push me harder and more reasonable or get lost.

In post 1282, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1281, Enchant wrote:

In post 1275, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

This is an interesting post. How do you know mafia would know exactly what happened? Granted this is my first Upick, but wouldn’t simple logic dictate that someone would have a role to counter information?

I do not like this post at all.

You disliking everything i say and do.
Because you are mafia.
So you can as well dislike everyone.
No one cares.

So these posts are useless, push me harder and more reasonable or get lost.

Do I get an answer to the question with the sauce?

No, because you didn't answer my question about where i lying.

In post 771, CheekyTeeky wrote:Taly we're bffs now, there's no backing out ^.^

In post 807, CheekyTeeky wrote:-_-' I claim two way path blocker and will block Taly from themselves. Why is mastina not in Titus' townblock anymore btw.

In post 1284, Enchant wrote:

In post 1282, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1281, Enchant wrote:

In post 1275, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

This is an interesting post. How do you know mafia would know exactly what happened? Granted this is my first Upick, but wouldn’t simple logic dictate that someone would have a role to counter information?

I do not like this post at all.

You disliking everything i say and do.
Because you are mafia.
So you can as well dislike everyone.
No one cares.

So these posts are useless, push me harder and more reasonable or get lost.

Do I get an answer to the question with the sauce?

No, because you didn't answer my question about where i lying.

I did, twice…

Your Hired goon fought this battle yesterday…

It’s fine.. you’re boring anyway.

If you can't answer question and instead direct me on reading your iso and searching (which i fairly didn't found), then why i need to bother teaching you basic competency in game?

Right anwer: I don't need tho.

So I was planning on posting today, but my internet failed.

I won't be able to tonight or tomorrow night, so my only chance is tomorrow at noon, given that I will once more be vla for 48 hours come tomorrow. Will do what I can tho.

In post 1287, Enchant wrote:If you can't answer question and instead direct me on reading your iso and searching (which i fairly didn't found), then why i need to bother teaching you basic competency in game?

Right anwer: I don't need tho.

For like the 17th F’n time…

You said you were not going to hammer, and then you did..

Lie…

Don’t ask me again. And don’t use it as an excuse to ignore questions.

In post 1285, House wrote:

In post 771, CheekyTeeky wrote:Taly we're bffs now, there's no backing out ^.^

In post 807, CheekyTeeky wrote:-_-' I claim two way path blocker and will block Taly from themselves. Why is mastina not in Titus' townblock anymore btw.

Oh lol I thought she was joking about Anything Upick where she did block me in some form.

Tbh I think even with paranoia and regardless of my read accuracy I was a likely scum NK.

I'm not commeting on the Ascetic but my survival benefits the town exponentially, and yes, this is not a usual sentiment of mine.

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

You're wrong on both counts.

Mafia don't necessarily have all information.

Those are not the only two possible outcomes.

In post 1272, Titus wrote:I find it very suspicious how little TRs you have. It feels like you'll jump on anything with a wagon. Any wagon but for Taly you have mentioned being willing to vote for vague reasons.

Nice misrep - I haven't mentioned willingness to vote anyone all game.

In post 1291, ɀefiend wrote:

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

You're wrong on both counts.

Mafia don't necessarily have all information.

Those are not the only two possible outcomes.

Okay.

Tell me others?

It'll be fun to see if I survive N2.

In any case, this post is a reminder to get in contact with primarily off their recent posts.

In post 1279, House wrote:VOTE: zefiend

I hadn't considered the possibility Taly might be Ascetic. Nice catch.

Taly, I'll quote it after work

Answer the question or eat rope.

VOTE: House

In post 1293, Enchant wrote:

In post 1291, ɀefiend wrote:

In post 1274, Enchant wrote:

In post 1271, ɀefiend wrote: This would tell scum (1) that there's a protective role and (2) that the protective role targeted person X

It doesh't make House more townie or more mafia (atleast this exact argument), because mafia already knows what happened fully. They of course can and will try to pass it as notinformed, but most likely they simple trying to not talk about this at all, to not give hints and attention.

Like why scumread someone for giving information to mafia, because if they are mafia they kinda already know and thus every other mafia member will know as well. There's no benifit in telling.


Also wtf there's literally... Well ok, two outcomes, first is where Cheeky roleblocked and second where she visited Ascetic. We can't do anything with that.

You're wrong on both counts.

Mafia don't necessarily have all information.

Those are not the only two possible outcomes.

Okay.

Tell me others?

If you read the thread mastina posted three possibilities.

There are more beyond that.

In post 1289, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1287, Enchant wrote:If you can't answer question and instead direct me on reading your iso and searching (which i fairly didn't found), then why i need to bother teaching you basic competency in game?

Right anwer: I don't need tho.

For like the 17th F’n time…

You said you were not going to hammer, and then you did..

Lie…

Don’t ask me again. And don’t use it as an excuse to ignore questions.

I don't consider this lie, but okay. Only once.


When Cheeky flipped i searched how it was possible for her to die like that.

I excluded all impossible ways (it's you all asking meme questions like WILL HIDER DIE IF TARGET PROTECTED) and all other, while it's already obvious.


Atleast i found only these two possible ways.

First: Roleblocker. Why exactly roleblocker?
Because Jailkeeper, Alien and Rolestopper would save.

Of course it's possible shit like strongman attacked target of Jailkeeper/Alien/Something, but i find chance of this so small, I don't believe it's case.

Second one is, well, visiting of Ascetic. There was mafia ascetic suggests so not impossible.


Now why i think mafia informed about.
They of course know who they NK. There's NO POSSIBLE WAY where Hider dies out of bat and his target survive. None.
So if they targeted Cheeky (and they targeted Cheeky), they know something prevented her from acting.

Either this is their Roleblocker or Ours. Regardless, they know there's one.

With Ascetic is hard case, but chances someone submitted Ascetic Town is fairly low, but there's mafia ascetic picks. Therefore yeah.

Now important: Nothing what House said added in this intel for mafia. They already know that, maybe even more accurate than us.

So there's no reason chicking out and fear revealing important info, but fairly, there's also no reason to discuss it at all. So i suggesting stop.


You satisfied?

Those are more words than I've seen Enchant put into some .

In post 1295, ɀefiend wrote:

In post 1279, House wrote:VOTE: zefiend

I hadn't considered the possibility Taly might be Ascetic. Nice catch.

Taly, I'll quote it after work

Answer the question or eat rope.

VOTE: House

You're funny.