It started in
1215, where I made the initial request and he asked me to make my read known first.
This was bad, because he wanted to know what others thought of Macros FIRST, as he wanted to analyze where he needed to stand in regards to Macros. Had he been pro-town, he would have come out and immediately given the read. You'll see more on this in my case against Junpei, but basically, when boiled down, Junpei-as-town would be aware of my meta, and that even as scum I use pseudotown quicktopics where I dump notes of my "reads" and my reasoning as to why--because heck, even most newbie-scum know they have to create reasoning for finding a player "suspicious", so Junpei asking me for my reasoning and accusing me of having none is itself BS.
Junpei-as-scum needs to know where I stand, wanting me to give an indepth account of Macros. I call him out on his lack of Macros interaction in
1221 and say that I've given plenty. In response to this, rather than giving a read on Macros (he didn't even need reasoning; he just needed a read), he
asks for in-depth reasoning for Macros. So instead of his reason being, "I want you to give me your read first", when I point out I already have, he says, "I want you to give me MORE reasoning before I give you a read." Again, this is something there is zero pro-town motivation for. I'd given my read, albeit not with reasoning, and from him as town, I would expect nothing more than a read until I had given my reasoning. But he didn't post a read--again, this is because he needed to know what evidence there was for-or-against Macros BEFORE he took a stance, because Macros is his scumbuddy and he needs to tread carefully with regards to whether or not to bus.
By now, I knew, and called him out on his dodging/deflecting in
1225, which basically said the same thing about Junpei--he had avoided the question, a quite simple question, in favor of trying to escape. And after I call him out on it in that post, he AGAIN tries to deflect
here, where he tries to say that my analysis has not been in-depth by pointing out my most recent read. And then I
say that I have done my work in my QT, which Junpei should KNOW that I use every game. And that I wouldn't alter or change my read in said QT in any way. (I didn't. I hadn't typed up my post on Macross which was post 60 in my QT, but post 60 was based off of 53-58 which were devoted to Macros almost exclusively--59 was where I said, "Screw Macros being town; Junpei's refusal to give a read on him makes him scum", and I had already made that post by this point in time.)
And yet despite this promise (which I upheld) that could be VERY easily proven, Junpei STILL refused
here, insisting that I wasn't scumhunting. (This is of course doubly-wrong. Even as scum, I know how to fake scumhunting and in fact do so competently. The doubly-so comes from the part where I think this game is multiscum, so even as scum I would have reason to legitimately scumhunt the other team. In other words, no matter what, I wouldn't not be scumhunting.) When all I had asked for was a simple read, he continued to think of excuses not to answer and (once more, I remind you) has YET to.
I stop playing nice and demand one final time
for Junpei to answer, yet he brushes my comment off, tries to deflect the conversation away from HIM giving a Macros read in
1236, and by this point, it's abundantly clear he has no intention to ever give a Macros read.
Which he hasn't.
There couldn't be much of a clearer picture linking him to Macros.
.
) Heck if I know what my most recent town game is. Check New York games. I've been in pretty much every single one. If you want a town multiscum game, you'd have to find Alduskkel's Fire & Ice Open; that's the only game I was alive long enough in. (Rolling in the Deep really doesn't, given my lifespan in there. 
