Page 53 of 65

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:12 am
by SafetyDance
orcinus_theoriginal wrote:newb town with good intentions mostly but i wouldn't be opposed

Honestly, Pitoli/Lurker/SD go today and I feel like it's an even chance of hitting scum in all three. Just lynch through that pile until victory because you, me, and buld are all town.

One of you is
definitely
scum. And if it is a pitoli/mala/lurker combination then my fucking god did you guys run a major noise production for them. They couldn't have asked for better conditions.

orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Post #1065 » Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:16 pm

Post #1071 » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:13 pm

Buld

Does this strike you as odd? (you sort of have to view the posts to see what i'm talking about, it's the time gap between buld read my request for a massclaim and the time when he actually posted, I find it very suspicious)

Not more so than his normal play. Shadowhunting. Hang on, since when does four hours make 'the next day'?
orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Yes Buldermar, you did take a long time to claim. You did a burst of posts...stopped halfway (never before) and then came back the next day to claim.



orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
Your memory is not too good.

The entirety of my basis of my brief spin on pitoli was based on her avoidance of the fery wagon, her popcorn of Syryana, and her nero vote. Actually, I hate everyone who voted nero and not lurker.

1100+ posts and you expect people to remember them all? Unrealistic.

orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
SafetyDance wrote:There's way too many pages to catch up so I'm just prod-dodging. Sorry, should have done it last night but got distracted. Should have time tonight.

I can't wait to hear your latest slew of insults. I hope you have some good ones prepared!

Spoiler:
Image


4 pages to go...

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:13 am
by buldermar
Malakittens wrote:I dismantled it yet, but you're still trying to cling to it even though its all a bunch of bullshit. Don't bitch when I flip town and go 'I told you so'.

Anyways I was asking for someone else's other then yours.. Such as Orc or even Pit. Sorry to break it to you, but not everything is about you.

You didn't dismantle anything with respect to my reasons for voting you.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:14 am
by buldermar
Hey SD, please refrain from posting - you're filling the thread with needless spam and it's difficult for the rest of us to read the actual content.

Herp derp derp

Thanks.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:17 am
by Malakittens
Yes I fucken did.

You haven't yet explained to me how not reading is a scum tell. Also the fact I was READIG ISO'S doesn't equal 'pretending' to read. As reading ISO's does actually work.


Predit: Buld.. You shouldn't be talking. You come out with your own snark or insults.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:20 am
by SafetyDance
buldermar wrote:
orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Buld/Syr:

Who's your 'strongest' town read in pit/lurk/sd/mala

Strongest town read is SD because of Nero - unlike Mala, I'm inclined to think it is most likely T-T neighbors.

Pit looks bad for that last FoS of Mala which to me looked like a copy of what I said and pointed out in my post prior to it, and the subsequent explanation that she just didn't want to mention her read with Mala V/LA doesn't sound legit.

Lurker has just been living up to his name and not done shit the entire game. I think Lurker is not a bad bet for scum if we go by the assumption of the three of us being town.

I still like Mala for scum the most, but it does worry me a bit that she doesn't look particularly scummy to you guys. Also, maybe we should look into how often she fakeclaims VT compared to PR's as scum. I know of some people who almost always fakeclaim VT.

Lol my first town read. I don't know whether to thank or you speed-lynch you because you know I'm definitely town (gosh, this line of thought reminds me of someone...).

Syryana wrote:
buldermar wrote:
Is the movie/series that the flavor is based on one about good/evil or some sort of two faculties that could easily be converted to this context?

BSG is about two factions: humans and Cylons. The Cylons are humanoid robots made by the humans, and they blew the shit out of the human colonies. The show is about the tiny human fleet traveling through space fleeing the Cylons with only the Battlestar Galactica for protection. However, it gets a bit murky near the end cause there end up being Cylons that help the humans and humans that help the Cylons and humans that end up being Cylons but help the humans anyways and all sorts of weird shit.

This is also why I'm highly suspicious of SD's claim. His character isn't even FROM the show, it's from a completely different one called Caprica, which was a terrible offshoot of BSG some couple of years later. This one was set way before the events of BSG. Shame on FuriousFalcon for even putting her in here if SD isn't lying, shame on SD for picking such a terrible flavor claim if he is.

P.S.: Mala, who are your scumreads?

Shame on you for being an absolute idiot.

Syryana wrote:I have it!!! I have it I have it I have it!

I know who the scum are.

Look at the following list and you all tell me if you see it too.

Player List:

buldermar - Lee Adama
fferyllt - Kara Thrace (dead/confirmed)
Nero - Gaius Baltar (dead/confirmed)
Sotty7 (now SD) - Zoe Graystone
pitoli - Karl "Helo" Agathon
Lurker - Saul Tigh
Syryana - Galen Tyrol
orcinus - Laura Roslin
Deltabacon (now Malakittens) - William Adama

Two people on that list are lying about their flavor. Can you figure out which two?

This is just ludicrous.

It's like you're completely ignoring AP altogether. You know, the guy who mods this.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:24 am
by SafetyDance
pitoli wrote:
orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
pitoli wrote:T->S: SafetyDance, Lurker, Malakittens

I don't feel great about this voting bloc because it didn't work that well for you yesterday. Also because I don't particularly trust Syr.
I'll be honest, I'm willing to follow you on Lurker partly because I feel guilty about having picked the wrong policy yesterday.

1). We didn't have a voting bloc today.
2). Syr is about 500x townier than you.
3). We didn't policy vote yesterday.
4). That's a shitty reason to vote.


1) As far as I'm concerned, you/ffery/buldermar yesterday was nearly a voting bloc.
2) I hope you're right about him.
3) I didn't say we did.
4) I meant that you were right about Nero, so I'm giving more consideration to lynches you lead from now on.

They
were
a voting bloc. You're actually talking sense now.

Syryana wrote:Very well. I'm tired, so I'll be brief.

The scum are pitoli and orcinus. They're the only ones whose flavor claims don't match their genders.

Oh good fucking lord. You can't be serious.
Syryana wrote:
buldermar wrote:
Syryana wrote:Very well. I'm tired, so I'll be brief.

The scum are pitoli and orcinus. They're the only ones whose flavor claims don't match their genders.

For this to be the case, AP would have had to look into genders before distributing flavor roles...

Perhaps, but I find it hard to shrug off as coincidence the fact that 2 of the 9 don't match up when there are 2 scum.

Nope,
you
can't be serious?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:31 am
by SafetyDance
Malakittens wrote:Dear Lord, SD, are you always this nasty when town? I mean I have seen it in Aifam, but to an extent in Bit's, but do you do it as scum too?

What has that got to do with your own complete misinterpretation of everything and just going down easy st with your reads? What other reaction am I meant to have to everyone following Syrana and thinking that was an actual flavor claim? Serious wtf.

buldermar wrote:
I don't know either of Caprica or BSG.

In other words, go fuck yourself you waste of human life.

This is pathetic, you trot this line out time and time again. It's not an excuse that's valid in a theme game and why should I trust it? You've given me no inclination too. Get over yourself.

buldermar wrote:Hey SD, please refrain from posting - you're filling the thread with needless spam and it's difficult for the rest of us to read the actual content.

Herp derp derp

Thanks.

Why, you're afraid to be confronted with the truth? You'd hate for someone to correct you that's not in your circle-jerk? :roll:

Forgive me for trying to play the game and respond as I read it. I did think that's why I'm here for.

But I forget, you just want the game to be filled with Lurkers and ffleryts. :roll:

Anyway, I've caught up now. Will gladly do something else for the rest of the day.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:31 am
by Malakittens
Blech.

Lurker is lurking and not even doing any scum hunting. He's coasting along. In fact I don't even know who he thinks is scum or town. Buld/Orc/I is probably a perfect distraction and he's not being called due to everyone focusing on either role claim names, flavor or rather annoying back and forth a between players.

VOTE: Lurker

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:40 am
by SafetyDance
#1300. That's what I said

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:43 am
by Malakittens
I know you did and believe it or not I read your posts regardless of your snark or not. I know my alignment and its not smart to lynch me. Lurker is a much better lynch today because he's useless and not doing anything to help the town.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:42 pm
by Lurker
This is almost a game at this rate.

Good Luck with that town flip.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:50 pm
by AngryPidgeon
Vote Count 2.8Malakittens [2/4] - buldermar, orcinus_theoriginal
Lurker [1/4] - Malakittens
orcinus_theoriginal [1/4] - SafetyDance
pitoli [1/4] - Syryana

Pacifists (Not Voting): Lurker, pitoli

With 7 alive, its 4 to lynch


Deadline: April 24th at Noon (GMT-8)
(expired on 2013-04-24 12:00:00)


Mod Notes:
*Malak is V/LA to Tuesday

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:50 pm
by Malakittens
In post 1310, Lurker wrote:This is almost a game at this rate.

Good Luck with that town flip.
How about you start contributing something? Then maybe you can change whether or not you get lynched or not...

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:53 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
Look guys

Lynching through Lurker>Malak>SD wins us the game

If we lynch SD we might have to read less of his posts

VOTE: SD

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 2:55 pm
by Malakittens
OMGUS much Orc?

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:02 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
VOTE: Malakittens

I honestly do not care who gets lynched. You, lurker, and SD are being lynched the next 2 days. The order is of no consequence

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:04 pm
by Malakittens
In post 1315, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:VOTE: Malakittens

I honestly do not care who gets lynched. You, lurker, and SD are being lynched the next 2 days. The order is of no consequence
STOP TRYING TO POLICY LYNCH SD and lynch someone who is probably likely scum.

You're lining up lynches which is a scum-tell imo. Lurker is a much better vote and lynch overall because he's scummy as all fuck due to not contributing anything worthwhile for two days now.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:16 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 1316, Malakittens wrote:You're lining up lynches which is a scum-tell imo. Lurker is a much better vote and lynch overall because he's scummy as all fuck due to not contributing anything worthwhile for two days now.
Why is lining up lynches a scumtell?
why is lurking "scummy as all fuck"--lurking seems like a policy lynch, not SD

ok we can do this now

Syryana/Buldermar/Pitoli lynch this shit

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:17 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 1187, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Yes, I most
certainly
am lining up lynches.
This was your chance to bring up why it was scummy just fyi

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:23 pm
by Malakittens
I'm sorry the endless spam between you and Buld is highly annoying. I already called you out for trying to trying to lynch people only because you want them for information or Policy Lynch. It's Day 2 - Policy lynches are over and it won't help the town at all especially when a policy lynch will bring us into LyLo during Day 3 unless there's a godly doc to protect someone..

Lurker has contributed jack shit. He's taking full advantage of the current situation at hand and using it to his advantage. He's not hunting or even lifting an eyebrow to wanting to.. He's not at all a policy lynch - he's a good lynch because chances are he'll flip scum.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:25 pm
by Malakittens
Still haven't seen your almighty case that equals me being scum. I have seen Buld and already stated where most of his points are wrong or not applicable. You aren't even trying.. You're just tossing your vote around hoping someone will stick to it and lynch someone.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:32 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
In post 1284, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
In post 1282, Malakittens wrote:So anyone want to present a case to why I'm a good lynch. Still don't see it.
You're not pitoli, Buldermar, syryana, or me.

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:33 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
Also, lurker is a policy lynch.

SD is not.

Can we just wagon this

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:37 pm
by Malakittens
In post 1322, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Also, lurker is a policy lynch.

SD is not.

Can we just wagon this
How is Lurker a policy lynch? How?

Why is Lurker worth keeping over me? Why is Lurker worth keeping over SD?

SD is a policy lynch. You just want to lynch him to stop having to read his annoying posts that have insults in it when SD is actually trying to hunt whereas Lurker is not.

So please enlighten me on how SD is a much better lynch then Lurker?

You keep flopping on Lurker and it's bothersome. Beginning of Day 2 you were like Lurker NK'd Nero. SD can't be scum because why would scum-SD kill his neighbor town-Nero?..

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:46 pm
by orcinus_theoriginal
Lurker is a policy lynch today for the same reason he was a policy lynch yesterday

Lurker is worth keeping both of you because he doesn't talk so I don't have to reply to so many posts by scum.

SD is not a policy lynch because I have a scumcase on him.

SD is not a "much better lynch than lurker" do not put words in my mouth. Like I said, I don't care who I lynch today, as long as its in SD/Lurker/you.

But after that I just want to lynch you.

Congrats