Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:36 am
serra and Desp are scum, Bert. Replace tne and slimer with them.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 1118, Wisdom wrote:serra was okay with almost any wagon - Mantis, macmollie, Desperado, havingfitz - but not yours. If he is scum, why specifically not want your wagon but want anyone else's?In post 1114, Natirasha wrote:Then, by this logic, why am I scum?In post 1113, Wisdom wrote:Because I cannot see how the fuck serra would do that as town.
In post 1119, Natirasha wrote:Perhaps he thought I was gullible(I had been on his side since his first post) and having a townie in your pocket is good?In post 1118, Wisdom wrote:serra was okay with almost any wagon - Mantis, macmollie, Desperado, havingfitz - but not yours. If he is scum, why specifically not want your wagon but want anyone else's?In post 1114, Natirasha wrote:Then, by this logic, why am I scum?In post 1113, Wisdom wrote:Because I cannot see how the fuck serra would do that as town.
Wisdom do you have any other comments on my Nat case beyond it being terribad? And are all bad cases made by scum?In post 1120, Wisdom wrote:Bleh. I have to admit that's not a bad answer.
like how I was wrong about gm in monks and masons?In post 1288, Wisdom wrote:Okay, you're wrong.
that is not why I am not getting I am not getting you cos you jump to a retarded conclusion like you just did and honestly think I should think that you are town for it.In post 1289, Mantisdreamz wrote:macmollie, you're probably not getting me this game because for the most of it, i've had a scum read on you.
anyway, kinda think you probably are town, esp with all the back and forth in recent pages.
no, like how you were wrong about a zillion people in gonzo.In post 1307, macmollie wrote:like how I was wrong about gm in monks and masons?
You keep saying this, and I keep disagreeing. How is what we are talking about right now "doing nothing?"In post 1305, Wisdom wrote:No, town make bad cases too. The thing is you're not going after anyone else and you're continuing doing nothing.
most of the time unless it is d1 then I bitch and moan until I get my way if I have scum in my crosshairsIn post 1290, Bert wrote:We await your entrance, cuz you're under the heated blanket of suspicion <3In post 1268, serrapaladin wrote:Is anyone willing to lynch slimer today? I'll read this tomorrow.
*shrug* Since when do you ever defer?In post 1278, macmollie wrote:I had him as an early scumread but mac is pretty convinced he is town.I defer to mac cos he has really good gut instincts.
you mean that game where I caught scum fate on d2 through an investigation and had kuror as scum since d1?In post 1308, Wisdom wrote:no, like how you were wrong about a zillion people in gonzo.In post 1307, macmollie wrote:like how I was wrong about gm in monks and masons?
Have you gone bonkers?In post 1298, Bert wrote:In post 1294, theslimer3 wrote:Yeah you can wait.
OH HI GUYS I'M SLIMER,
"I like to keep people hanging with my reads, because I feel like it, and also I like to ask people about their fuckery"
"I'm bussing, Bert?" = (in Slimer's euphemistic way of expressing him/herself) "What kind of fuckery is that?"
And then I keep waiting...
waiting...
You make me laugh, lmao, now stop messing with me and give your reads of fuckery
OK, pulled 932 back from the gallows. But Natirasha wasn't near a lynch....she/he had a choice of which person to push, and Natirasha wasn't likely because Natirasha was one of the 6-7 people present. Fitz wasn't here, so reaching a lynch on Fitz was more likely than Nat. Plus Serra preferred a null-scum read over a townread?In post 932, Wisdom wrote:Anyone who townreads serra - fucking explain to me this.
serra states that he's willing to self-hammer over a no-lynch:That means he's willing to lynch someone who he knows town, the only one who he knows town, over a no-lynch. Good so far.In post 577, serrapaladin wrote:No lynching at an odd number with likely 1 NK is just really bad. I'm just a VT (Javier Esposito), so I'll be sure to self-hammer if you guys can't get the votes together, and get back to playing more f2f instead.
Then he refuses to vote Natirasha for a deadline lynch, which he supposedly does NOT know town.He tries to form wagons on anyone else, but when people vote Natirasha he goes "OMG NO DONT VOTE FOR NATIRASHA, ITS NO USE" and votes someone else instead. And then he and Natirasha form a wagon on havingfitz.
Tell me why the fuck would town-serra refuse to vote someone whose alignment he doesn't know when previously he was willing to vote himself in order to avoid the no-lynch. Go and read what happened and tell me why the fuck he would do it. See how he was talking about potentional mollie or Desp wagons, yet refused to vote Natirasha when Natirasha already had 4 votes on him. And then had no problem voting havingfitz either.Fucking explain how serra is town doing this.
^says the person who claims not to be hostile in this gameIn post 1312, macmollie wrote:you don't want to fuck with me over this wis, there is a bunch of shit that you don't know and you are seriously starting to piss me off.
Natirasha was at 4 votes, biggest wagon at the time.In post 1318, Bert wrote:But Natirasha wasn't near a lynch
Oh save it. Just go ahead and ask me if I'm on drugs, while you're at it (which I'm not). Is that the best response you have to my prodding you for reads? Still waiting for your reads... <3In post 1313, theslimer3 wrote:Have you gone bonkers?
whoa, shit just got real...In post 1315, theslimer3 wrote:
And wisdom everyone seems to think I might be scum but you. What gives you such an insight?
But if everyone present went for Natirasha, the lynch was less likely to reach than fitz, because then we lose Nat's support on his/her own wagon, whereas Nat gets to add a +1 vote on fitz's wagon. We weren't sure how many people were there. But yes, it's obvious that Serra did not want to lynch Nat if she/he could help it because she/he had other people she/he would rather lynch than Nat at the timeIn post 1319, Wisdom wrote:Natirasha was at 4 votes, biggest wagon at the time.In post 1318, Bert wrote:But Natirasha wasn't near a lynch
So this is the big case for scum-me you've been banging on about? This is really quite a shit argument. Most basically, my lynch order went me<Nati<everyone else, but let me let these quotes show you why you're a complete moron instead.In post 932, Wisdom wrote:Anyone who townreads serra - fucking explain to me this.
serra states that he's willing to self-hammer over a no-lynch:That means he's willing to lynch someone who he knows town, the only one who he knows town, over a no-lynch. Good so far.In post 577, serrapaladin wrote:No lynching at an odd number with likely 1 NK is just really bad. I'm just a VT (Javier Esposito), so I'll be sure to self-hammer if you guys can't get the votes together, and get back to playing more f2f instead.
Then he refuses to vote Natirasha for a deadline lynch, which he supposedly does NOT know town. He tries to form wagons on anyone else, but when people vote Natirasha he goes "OMG NO DONT VOTE FOR NATIRASHA, ITS NO USE" and votes someone else instead. And then he and Natirasha form a wagon on havingfitz.
Tell me why the fuck would town-serra refuse to vote someone whose alignment he doesn't know when previously he was willing to vote himself in order to avoid the no-lynch. Go and read what happened and tell me why the fuck he would do it. See how he was talking about potentional mollie or Desp wagons, yet refused to vote Natirasha when Natirasha already had 4 votes on him. And then had no problem voting havingfitz either. Fucking explain how serra is town doing this.
In post 811, serrapaladin wrote:I'd really much rather not.
In post 837, serrapaladin wrote:YOU STARTED VOTING NATI LIKE 10 FUCKING MINUTES AGOIn post 834, Wisdom wrote:We don't have fucking time for fitz
In post 839, Mantisdreamz wrote:he is possible
In post 852, Lynx_Shine wrote:How is there no time for fitz he's had some accusations and consideration of being voted for the past several days. Nat's wagon also just started, what we don't have time for is debating whether or not there's time. Either get it done or don't. Like so:
VOTE: havingfitz
Wisdom wrote:WHAT FUCKING PART OF THERES NO TIME FOR FITZ DO YOU ALL NOT GETJesus fuck chill out how is there time for Nat and not fitz?
If this is seriously the sort of argument Wis will tunnel on for 15 or so pages, I really don't know what else to say... I think one of us needs to go today, so scum can stop hiding in the noise of Wisdom shouting at people for not agreeing with his terrible case.In post 854, Bert wrote:Fitz is not here and thus does not comprise one of us, leaving our maximum firepower at 7 votes
Nat is here; thus our total firepower on him/her is 6