Mafiascum.net

In post 1251, Aj The Epic wrote:

In post 1231, Trust Fund wrote:Aww, you don't like me wanting VI's dead and gone? You poor thing.

Confirmed town is still confirmed town. Don't make the town have to take care of it. That's for the scum to clear up. We hunt scum, not town. We vig unknowns, not verified town. Stop getting all butthurt about his claim. His play hasn't been a complete loss.

Show me a game where Mala used AtE so heavily and often as town. This isn't HER town game.

The point on zmuffin is something called 'confirmation bias'. He's not scum, get over it.

You can't even give a lean on Nick? Come on, he was part of the early controversy with TD, has posted throughout and every post he's made has stuck out to me like a sore thumb. I don't know how you've missed getting some read on him.

And I don't care if skull is on Mastin or not. She's obviously there as a sheep. There are scum on that wagon.

In post 1294, Desperado wrote:I guess I'm just really not seeing it then. Breaking it down into 4 parts, 1) is not useful, 2) is potentially useful, but Rach never actually examined the wagon, 3) is not useful, and 4) is not useful.

What did we actually learn about Rach's view of the game from this post? Nothing. "There are almost definitely scum on this bad wagon, we should look there!" is not content. "I'm not sold on both of you as town and you might be using your "hey we know each other" to blatantly buddy as scum" is not content, it's obfuscation.

And quoting that post shows just how useless Rach has been considering this:

In post 570, RachMarie wrote:ye gods

Sorry about that Mollie its more confusion than anything else. This game totally exploded faster than I thought it would. Going to look at some ISOs

FTR anyone who has ever played with me knows I get suspicious of fast wagons and quick lynches.

About time you got here Nacho

Wait Andy is playing too? where is he?

grumble grumble I will take some time to get a handle on this game

Could someone let me know who the heads of the hydrae are?

Other than B n B I know that one is Mollie and Jiffy.

The hydra question is so blatantly manufactured that it's honestly hard to believe. She's referred to all six of the heads in SOS/Trust Fund/BnB by name by the time she asks this question. No follow up on the TD wagon, no follow up on the ffery/mollie interactions.

Rach is scum, guys.

In post 1299, zMuffinMan wrote:

desperado wrote:What did we actually learn about Rach's view of the game from this post? Nothing. "There are almost definitely scum on this bad wagon, we should look there!" is not content. "I'm not sold on both of you as town and you might be using your "hey we know each other" to blatantly buddy as scum" is not content, it's obfuscation.

QFT. This (and the rest of 1294) is a more concise version of the thoughts I posted back in 879 in my mastin response, which expands on a lot of the reasons I think the quotes mastin called town are actually scum quotes.

Don't see where the town reads are coming from.

Also, @Desperado, 1137 has some responses to you.

In post 1299, zMuffinMan wrote:

desperado wrote:What did we actually learn about Rach's view of the game from this post? Nothing. "There are almost definitely scum on this bad wagon, we should look there!" is not content. "I'm not sold on both of you as town and you might be using your "hey we know each other" to blatantly buddy as scum" is not content, it's obfuscation.

QFT. This (and the rest of 1294) is a more concise version of the thoughts I posted back in 879 in my mastin response, which expands on a lot of the reasons I think the quotes mastin called town are actually scum quotes.

Don't see where the town reads are coming from.

Also, @Desperado, 1137 has some responses to you.

In post 1299, zMuffinMan wrote:

desperado wrote:What did we actually learn about Rach's view of the game from this post? Nothing. "There are almost definitely scum on this bad wagon, we should look there!" is not content. "I'm not sold on both of you as town and you might be using your "hey we know each other" to blatantly buddy as scum" is not content, it's obfuscation.

QFT. This (and the rest of 1294) is a more concise version of the thoughts I posted back in 879 in my mastin response, which expands on a lot of the reasons I think the quotes mastin called town are actually scum quotes.

Don't see where the town reads are coming from.

Also, @Desperado, 1137 has some responses to you.

In post 1300, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:@ syrlacious <3

@desp

the entrance post fit his scum meta but pl had not ended yet so I couldn't say it. it is a strong meta read, not in the way of pattern-matching but what I know about andy. he is posturing for affect <---- for andy, I am thinking that is a relative scumtell.

In post 1309, Malakittens wrote:Holy shit. The links that SoS posted on Andy look similar to the walls here. brb checking new links and then moving onto Mastin.

In post 1303, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 1294, Desperado wrote:I guess I'm just really not seeing it then. Breaking it down into 4 parts, 1) is not useful, 2) is potentially useful, but Rach never actually examined the wagon, 3) is not useful, and 4) is not useful.

What did we actually learn about Rach's view of the game from this post? Nothing. "There are almost definitely scum on this bad wagon, we should look there!" is not content. "I'm not sold on both of you as town and you might be using your "hey we know each other" to blatantly buddy as scum" is not content, it's obfuscation.

And quoting that post shows just how useless Rach has been considering this:

In post 570, RachMarie wrote:ye gods

Sorry about that Mollie its more confusion than anything else. This game totally exploded faster than I thought it would. Going to look at some ISOs

FTR anyone who has ever played with me knows I get suspicious of fast wagons and quick lynches.

About time you got here Nacho

Wait Andy is playing too? where is he?

grumble grumble I will take some time to get a handle on this game

Could someone let me know who the heads of the hydrae are?

Other than B n B I know that one is Mollie and Jiffy.

The hydra question is so blatantly manufactured that it's honestly hard to believe. She's referred to all six of the heads in SOS/Trust Fund/BnB by name by the time she asks this question. No follow up on the TD wagon, no follow up on the ffery/mollie interactions.

Rach is scum, guys.

In the quoted post and also for example in 432, you can see that she is formulating reads. That's what GiF means as "useful".

In post 1311, notscience wrote:Desp have you ever played with Rach before?

In post 1312, Trust Fund wrote:

In post 1309, Malakittens wrote:Holy shit. The links that SoS posted on Andy look similar to the walls here. brb checking new links and then moving onto Mastin.

Uh

"andy's walls here look like the scum meta SoS just linked"

"moving on to mastin"

???

In post 1315, Malakittens wrote:Dude. I already explained what I wanted to look for in Mastin's scum game. I'm not seeing it either.

viewtopic.php?f=54&t=25151&user_select[]=12314

Starting to doubt that scum-read on Mastin. -__-

In post 1310, Desperado wrote:

In post 1300, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:@ syrlacious <3

@desp

the entrance post fit his scum meta but pl had not ended yet so I couldn't say it. it is a strong meta read, not in the way of pattern-matching but what I know about andy. he is posturing for affect <---- for andy, I am thinking that is a relative scumtell.

Yeah I read those walls from Perpetual Mylo and I can see what you are seeing.

With that said, I also see a) way more detail in his reads and b) way more time spent antagonizing unconfirmed players.

What needs to happen to get you on board with Rach-scum? You were null-scum leaning on her earlier, what changed? I feel like she's gotten scummier as the game has progressed

In post 1313, Desperado wrote:

In post 1303, Sound of Silence wrote:

In post 1294, Desperado wrote:I guess I'm just really not seeing it then. Breaking it down into 4 parts, 1) is not useful, 2) is potentially useful, but Rach never actually examined the wagon, 3) is not useful, and 4) is not useful.

What did we actually learn about Rach's view of the game from this post? Nothing. "There are almost definitely scum on this bad wagon, we should look there!" is not content. "I'm not sold on both of you as town and you might be using your "hey we know each other" to blatantly buddy as scum" is not content, it's obfuscation.

And quoting that post shows just how useless Rach has been considering this:

In post 570, RachMarie wrote:ye gods

Sorry about that Mollie its more confusion than anything else. This game totally exploded faster than I thought it would. Going to look at some ISOs

FTR anyone who has ever played with me knows I get suspicious of fast wagons and quick lynches.

About time you got here Nacho

Wait Andy is playing too? where is he?

grumble grumble I will take some time to get a handle on this game

Could someone let me know who the heads of the hydrae are?

Other than B n B I know that one is Mollie and Jiffy.

The hydra question is so blatantly manufactured that it's honestly hard to believe. She's referred to all six of the heads in SOS/Trust Fund/BnB by name by the time she asks this question. No follow up on the TD wagon, no follow up on the ffery/mollie interactions.

Rach is scum, guys.

In the quoted post and also for example in 432, you can see that she is formulating reads. That's what GiF means as "useful".

Yeah but we're almost 1000 posts out from those two examples and we've still gotten nothing from her. I can't tell you a single thing that Rach actually believes.

In post 1310, Desperado wrote:

In post 1300, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:@ syrlacious <3

@desp

the entrance post fit his scum meta but pl had not ended yet so I couldn't say it. it is a strong meta read, not in the way of pattern-matching but what I know about andy. he is posturing for affect <---- for andy, I am thinking that is a relative scumtell.

Yeah I read those walls from Perpetual Mylo and I can see what you are seeing.

With that said, I also see a) way more detail in his reads and b) way more time spent antagonizing unconfirmed players.

What needs to happen to get you on board with Rach-scum? You were null-scum leaning on her earlier, what changed? I feel like she's gotten scummier as the game has progressed

In post 1320, Sound of Silence wrote:about 1000 post in a really fast moving thread. Her rate of posting over time here is consistent with recent games I've played with her since her knee injury and stuff. I don't think that is alignment indicative.