Mafiascum.net

In post 1287, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 1282, Kid A wrote:VOTE: peacebringer

you think I am lying? seriously?

i havent finished reading but i dont think your role makes sense unless there are quicktopics other than the mafia one

there is at least one other quicktopic in this game (the BB/RC one).

why do you think he'd claim it if he's scum?

In post 1300, Kid A wrote:

In post 1287, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 1282, Kid A wrote:VOTE: peacebringer

you think I am lying? seriously?

i havent finished reading but i dont think your role makes sense unless there are quicktopics other than the mafia one

there is...

In post 1302, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 1300, Kid A wrote:

In post 1287, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 1282, Kid A wrote:VOTE: peacebringer

you think I am lying? seriously?

i havent finished reading but i dont think your role makes sense unless there are quicktopics other than the mafia one

there is...

and if there was not I would be proclaiming lynch my arse left and right.

Luna, why did your townread of me lessen before the mod error?

Don't remember why I liked Dante, dislike him on reread. Bleh.

I like DV for town

SP is town

RT is town

Pb town

Busy with grading and exam preparations, so I have nothing to add at the moment.
Willing to sheep anyone who makes a convincing argument, i.e. not based on gut.
Will be back later tonight, with any luck.

an announcement or intimation of something impending; warning: a day's notice.

Vote Count 3.03

Luna Lovegood

( 1 ) DeasVail

Dante

( 0 )

DeasVail

( 0 )

Shadowy Poison

( 0 )

Rail Tracer

( 1 ) Kmd4390

PeaceBringer

( 2 ) Kid A

ooba

( 0 )

Kmd4390

( 1 ) Majiffy

Kid A

( 0 )

Mitillos

( 4 ) ooba , PeaceBringer , Rail Tracer , Shadowy Poison

RadiantCowbells

( 0 )

Majiffy

( 0 )

BBmolla

( 1 ) RadiantCowbells

Not voting:

Luna Lovegood , Dante , Mitillos , BBmolla

With 13 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline is in

MItillos could easily be scum.

no shit.

you should vote him.

What is the case on Mit?

Sup with the lack of any counterwagons whatsoever?

In post 1309, Kmd4390 wrote:What is the case on Mit?

Shadow's ISO if you have the time; my post is a good summary of his case.

Shadow wrote:RC, stop being a tunnelly shit, read my case on Mollatown, and tell me where I have gone wrong

read my case on Dia and tell me why I'm wrong there

and tell me why we are wrong about Mitillos being scum

Shadow wrote:you are both cops, AND with confirmed Sanity. do you really, really think that, even if it is a neighborhood and not a masonry, that there is even a slight chance that one of you two are scum?

If you're referring to this - It's not that convincing .Rail's catch up is good. Right now I can see two possible lines of scum pairing
a) Maj - Mit
b) BBM - Luna
Somewhat mutually exclusive pairings since I dont think BBM-Mit are scum together. I can see KidA being a member of both groups.

Maj wrote:Sup with the lack of any counterwagons whatsoever?

You can always take me as voting for BBM. If you want a counter wagon - switch over to BBM.

I wish it was a Me/Luna pairing, that'd be awesome.

In post 1312, ooba wrote:

In post 1309, Kmd4390 wrote:What is the case on Mit?

my post is a good summary of his case.

Link doesn't work for me for whatever reason, links to the first post in the thread.

In post 1315, Majiffy wrote:

In post 1312, ooba wrote:

In post 1309, Kmd4390 wrote:What is the case on Mit?

my post is a good summary of his case.

Link doesn't work for me for whatever reason, links to the first post in the thread.

Somehow I can never get the post tags to work - let me stick to URL tags.This post.

Too much of that hinges on me being scum with Mit. Shit case.

Vote KMD with me. Nani had that really bad post I found and ICBA to get around that.

^I would be down with that.

... Then do it?

Get more signatures on the petition to lynch him and sure

Assuming that my role is useful (which it's probably not), Mitillos is not the best lynch.

In post 1030, DeasVail wrote:Regarding Luna Lovegood, first, I feel that their/his play has just generally been less town than I'd expect. I also suspect that his push on BBmolla's reaction to the guilty is forced. I agree that there were some weird things there, but I don't think it's common practice to assume a mod error, even if given a confusing result (I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have), and given that naive cop (and knowing you're one) is pretty boring unless there's some sort of role interaction that can make it not so, I think that this game there is perhaps even more reason to not question the guilty. The main thing of late, however, is the push for N to publicly reveal whether or not a mod error occurred. It is pushier than I'd expect from Nacho, and I think it's just an attempt to look town where in fact it just doesn't really do anything for the town.

This is why I want a Luna lynch.

@DV: I'm not sure how your role has anything to do with my lynch. Care to elaborate? Also, Luna asking for a public reveal from N is a null-tell.

@ooba: In post 1267, you split your case up into 3 parts. Here are my responses:
Part 1) How do you tell someone who is being active from someone who is trying to look active? This begs the question. As for the answers being "readily available", this is only the case if you were to take BB's word as true, in advance. I do not propose to do this, because such assumptions are unwarranted.
Part 2) Yes, my reads were weak. I suffer from not-knowing-everyone's-alignment-itis, which means I can't make categorical statements. Anyone who asserts such knowledge is either scum or an investigative role with some meaningful result. Or they found a clear contradiction in someone's words, which I have not. As for Pere and Peace not being scum together, a) how can you be so certain and more importantly b) how does this have anything to do with anything? There is the possibility of multiball, there is the possibility of them wanting to appear to not be partners and there's also the amazingly likely possiblity that at least one of my reads was wrong. So, why would I ignore one person, just because I might think that another is scum and they "can't" be scum together?
Part 3) No, I didn't question Majiffy. Others did that before, on D2. He responded to them, so why would I pointlessly ask him the same thing again, just to get the same answer?

Speaking of which, I did ISO kmd as he suggested in response to my question. His case on Rail is based on a single post. Generally speaking, a single post is not enough to make a case. Which is also my problem with Majiffy's push on kmd. Yeah, Nani's 658 was a crap case but how is it scummy, rather than derpy? And Rail suggesting that Pere be lynched if he got blocked again is understandable, even if it turns out it would have been wrong. Which is also another reason I think Rail is town. If he was considering pushing the Pere lynch, why would Pere be killed overnight?

meh, that last post has a genuine feel to it...